Ulrich G. Kliegis
Von: "David J Taylor" <gm8arv@...>
Datum: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 17:29:20 -0000
Betreff: Re: [MSG-1] not yet perfect, but...
Antwort an: MSG-1@...
Yes, it may be that you need to add this entry by hand.Just to check, you /do/ have a tmp_directory entry in yourHow could this box run for years without the tmp definition in the
Hmm, Alan Sewards says it is not necessary since the pointers are in the
I don't dare to ask, who's right, but rather, what is recommended?
Yes, two drives, physically different. E: ist 250 GB, F: 400 GB.
I'll purge some 'e's from the temp-trm then and see...
Changing the architecture altogether could be one of the next steps.
The reason for coupling the temp and target files on the same disk / partition
was given here some years ago: That the files that would land in the target
directory in the end are composed piece by piece in the temp files, and that
moving them to the target then means just a change in the FAT. Isn't that
true any more on NTFS formatted disks (not sure to which generation this
old wisdom related).