Date
1 - 3 of 3
Revised Group Description and other updates.
|
Brad <alcogoodwin@...>
Morning Everyone,
Was just going through Frank's revised group description. I would be unable to use that many characters on the front page of the Yahoogroup however I am thinking we could do the following. 1) I will go through and reword what is there and fits more in line with what Frank has outlined. 2) There is some way that files can be sent out all people who apply for membership. I shall work this out and Frank's entire description will be sent to them to read while waiting for one of us to give them the nod. You will notice from this morning that Frank's disclaimer appears at the bottom of each group posting. I'm also happy to report a number of people awaiting membership approval to the group this morning. All well known in industrial railway circles. Best wishes Brad |
|
|
|
Frank Stamford
Good morning Brad,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I would hold off doing any rewording yet. At the moment I am working on another version, which takes a different approach. It was prompted by my thoughts on how to link the web site to the Yahoo group. I will probably have something available this weekend, possibly today. Regards, Frank At 09:46 AM 18/08/2006, you wrote:
Morning Everyone, |
|
|
|
Phil Rickard <chy_gwel_an_meneth@...>
Brad, Frank,
Any chance of including "Defence dept and explosives" (or similar)in the "1) Industrial" list? Various govts, both colonial and federal operated an extemely diverse group of tramways, some only a few hundred yards (ie. S.A. colonial govt at Port Adelaide Torpedo Station) [the explosive torpedo not the Bluescope type!] through to Explosives Factory Maribyrnong with over ten miles of 18½-inch tramway. cheers Phil |
|
|