Re: NSW wharves 1892


David Halfpenny
 

On 30 Aug 2017, at 03:14, Kevin Sewell kevinrsewell@gmail.com [LRRSA] <LRRSA@yahoogroups.com.au> wrote:

It is entirely possible that the reverse terminology/regime was applied to wharves but thats not logical or consistent. Possible but not logical.
Irrelevant anecdote:

At Fen Ditton in England, all water traffic is required to cross over twice in quick succession. Given that the river is sharply S shaped, this probably counts as "Logical if not Consistent”.

It sure gets a lot of non-boatmen into a lather as other craft lurch inexplicably into their path, shouting :-)

David 1/2d

Join LRRSA@groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.