Re: LRRSA webpage cited by National Competition Council
|
CNsylvester
Interesting reading.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Incidently, Victoria Mill have regulatory accreditation for the Homebush Steam Train component only - thats an example where two forms can co-exist, and that operation continues successfully with services a couple of times each year. So its not accredited for the Sugar Cane Operation, just the passenger operation. One may think if regulations was so burdensome, the passenger operation would be hived off? Is the regulatory model so much of a burden that an opportunity to put some otherwise road freight back onto rail willing to be lost? What is the actual cost, has it been costed? The 2010Transport (Rail Safety) Regulation reveals the fees section 46 http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/LEGISLTN/SLS/2010/10SL167.pdf CNsylvester .
-----Original Message-----
From: John Browning <ceo8@iinet.net.au> To: LRRSA@yahoogroups.com.au Sent: Sun, Sep 26, 2010 11:17 pm Subject: [LRRSA] LRRSA webpage cited by National Competition Council http://www.ncc.gov.au/images/uploads/DERaHRFR-001.pdf This is in the recent case involving an application for third party access to the Herbert River cane railway system. John logo John Browning PO Box 99 Annerley 4103 Queensland Australia Phone +61 (0)7 3255 9084 Mobile 0407 069 199
|
|
|