[HOsteam] LL 0-8-0 as a 2-8-0?
Chris Shinn <cnshinn@...>
The drivers on the LL 0-8-0 are very small and would look odd as a 2-8-0.toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
You could, though, probably convert her to a 2-10-0 Decapod. Since most
Decapods had smallish drivers it would look appropriate. I don't know if it
would be anywhere close to a prototype that was ever produced, though.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Soderblom" <email@example.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2000 10:24 AM
Subject: [HOsteam] LL 0-8-0 as a 2-8-0?
I have a question that came to mind the other day in seeing the
Thomas Beutel <fan2472@...>
Anything is possible. The Southern Pacific MK-10 and MK-11 class 2-8-2's
used 51 inch drivers, which would be considered small for a Mikado. I
believe the boilers were larger than those on the USRA 0-8-0. These Mikes
came from shortlines.
Thomas Beutel wrote:
What was the driver diameter on N&W's 4-8-0s?
To me, they looked like weightlifters in babybooties . . . . <g>