Re: Missing "Reply to Sender" link in email text footers? #footer #footers #replytosender


Hmm, I retested just to make sure I didn't miss something and no, it doesn't adjust the body to HTML'ed plain text, and the footer sent is identical to the one sent if only the Plain Text option was checked.  As a matter of fact, having both checked or just PlainText checked only results in the same exact text-formatted message body & footers, for example:

*BOLD variable-width Text*

Fixed-width Text


So apparently it's missing the "two flags" combo then and sends only the plain-text version of both the body and footers.


On 2022-04-26 21:42, Duane via wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 05:57 PM, Christos Psarras wrote:
Maybe it's wording but only one of those should be allowed to be selected at a time
I believe both are allowed intentionally.  Folks wanted Plain Text Only groups, but wanted Reply To Sender in the footer.  (Normalize html was added later to accomplish about the same thing.)  When both are checked, it's supposed to convert incoming to plain text, but send as html, so the html type footer gets used.  If that's not what it does, then there's a problem.

Lots of detailed information can be found in the Owners Manual and Members Manual.

Join to automatically receive all group messages.