My apologies for the confusing title of the previous message. I
tried to bring up Darryl's message asking for donations to
indicate we were a paid group which should have larger storage
limits. It didn't bring up his message and when I tried to
correct it, I just confused it further. If you respond, please
respond to this message with the new topic. Thanks and mea culpa.
Dale
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On 3/8/2020 5:25 PM, Dale Smith wrote:
Darryl sent this message about a year ago when we moved over to
groups.io. The response was quick and overwhelming, so much so
that Darryl had to ask people to stop sending contributions. At
the time this money was need to make us a paid group and was, if I
remember, $110 at that time. It is now $220. Becoming a paid
group was the price for getting transferred. The fact that we got
transferred is proof that he paid the money.
The point here is that paid groups have 20 GB of storage, not
1GB. We may have just passed our 1 year mark and have reverted
to being a free group. This may be what generated the message. I
didn't check during the year to see if we were given that extra
storage space, but I guess it is moot now.
As to contributions, $5 a month would be quite excessive. With
our 1238 members, that would generate $6190. Even $1 would
generate $1238. All to pay a $220 bill. $220 divided by 1238
would equal a fair share per member at about 18 cents. Obviously
not everyone is going to contribute, but even so handling
donations each year is a hassle and then returning excess
contributions is even more of a hassle. A few people will probably
carry this group if we need to go premium again.
Before we get too involved in the logistics of paying for premium
status, the question is whether or not we need the additional
storage. Our photo uploads are sized down to screen width (1024
pixels) to save space. I transferred the photos and normally
would have set the size at 1024 pixels at that time. I checked
and it appears that was what happened as one photo I checked was
downsized from 974 kb to 244kb. We could also thin our files some
to weed out the chaff. It wouldn't be much effort if the posters
could edit their own folders. I am listed as the owner of any
folders where an owner couldn't be identified, Usually that is
because they dropped out of the group, but might be the result of
an email change. They might be prime candidates for thinning.
I am not sure we need to do anything now though, as it will take
us a while to use up the 200 megabytes. That 244kb photo is
typical of the largest size photos that fill the screen. It would
take us just over 800 photos of that size to fill our remaining
space.
Dale
|
|

Warner Swarner
Dale and others, I fully agree. Just $10 a year from 22 loyal readers of this group will float this boat fine. If more space is needed, I am fully behind it. I appreciate so much the efforts everyone puts in to keep contributing memories plus new ideas and model work. Thank you all. Warner
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Mar 8, 2020, at 6:00 PM, Dale Smith <dalesierra@...> wrote:
My apologies for the confusing title of the previous message. I
tried to bring up Darryl's message asking for donations to
indicate we were a paid group which should have larger storage
limits. It didn't bring up his message and when I tried to
correct it, I just confused it further. If you respond, please
respond to this message with the new topic. Thanks and mea culpa.
Dale
On 3/8/2020 5:25 PM, Dale Smith wrote:
Darryl sent this message about a year ago when we moved over to
groups.io. The response was quick and overwhelming, so much so
that Darryl had to ask people to stop sending contributions. At
the time this money was need to make us a paid group and was, if I
remember, $110 at that time. It is now $220. Becoming a paid
group was the price for getting transferred. The fact that we got
transferred is proof that he paid the money.
The point here is that paid groups have 20 GB of storage, not
1GB. We may have just passed our 1 year mark and have reverted
to being a free group. This may be what generated the message. I
didn't check during the year to see if we were given that extra
storage space, but I guess it is moot now.
As to contributions, $5 a month would be quite excessive. With
our 1238 members, that would generate $6190. Even $1 would
generate $1238. All to pay a $220 bill. $220 divided by 1238
would equal a fair share per member at about 18 cents. Obviously
not everyone is going to contribute, but even so handling
donations each year is a hassle and then returning excess
contributions is even more of a hassle. A few people will probably
carry this group if we need to go premium again.
Before we get too involved in the logistics of paying for premium
status, the question is whether or not we need the additional
storage. Our photo uploads are sized down to screen width (1024
pixels) to save space. I transferred the photos and normally
would have set the size at 1024 pixels at that time. I checked
and it appears that was what happened as one photo I checked was
downsized from 974 kb to 244kb. We could also thin our files some
to weed out the chaff. It wouldn't be much effort if the posters
could edit their own folders. I am listed as the owner of any
folders where an owner couldn't be identified, Usually that is
because they dropped out of the group, but might be the result of
an email change. They might be prime candidates for thinning.
I am not sure we need to do anything now though, as it will take
us a while to use up the 200 megabytes. That 244kb photo is
typical of the largest size photos that fill the screen. It would
take us just over 800 photos of that size to fill our remaining
space.
Dale
|
|
I may have actually overestimated our remaining space. It is
closer to 163 mb, but still enough for 668 photos. I did get rid
of about 5 mb of data by deleting the tif files that couldn't be
read by the groups.io photo viewer. Those photos by Bob Hogan are
now saved in high res on Jeff's site as well as being in their own
album in jpg form on groups.io.
The problem with deleting is it is hard to bite the bullet and
decide what can go. Who decides what can go is another problem.
What Also since the files are pretty small, it takes a lot of
deletion to make any real dent so it is a lot of work. Definitely
worth the added expense, which at $10 is pretty minimal. I don't
doubt that we will have more than enough volunteers. I would just
wait until we get a bit closer to our maximum storage limit.
Dale
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On 3/8/2020 7:16 PM, Warner Swarner via
Groups.Io wrote:
Dale and others,
I fully agree. Just $10 a year from 22 loyal readers of this
group will float this boat fine. If more space is needed, I am
fully behind it. I appreciate so much the efforts everyone puts
in to keep contributing memories plus new ideas and model work.
Thank you all.
Warner
My apologies for the confusing title of the previous
message. I tried to bring up Darryl's message asking for
donations to indicate we were a paid group which should
have larger storage limits. It didn't bring up his
message and when I tried to correct it, I just confused it
further. If you respond, please respond to this message
with the new topic. Thanks and mea culpa.
Dale
On 3/8/2020 5:25 PM, Dale Smith
wrote:
Darryl sent this message about a year ago when we moved
over to groups.io. The response was quick and
overwhelming, so much so that Darryl had to ask people to
stop sending contributions. At the time this money was
need to make us a paid group and was, if I remember, $110
at that time. It is now $220. Becoming a paid group was
the price for getting transferred. The fact that we got
transferred is proof that he paid the money.
The point here is that paid groups have 20 GB of storage,
not 1GB. We may have just passed our 1 year mark and
have reverted to being a free group. This may be what
generated the message. I didn't check during the year to
see if we were given that extra storage space, but I guess
it is moot now.
As to contributions, $5 a month would be quite excessive.
With our 1238 members, that would generate $6190. Even
$1 would generate $1238. All to pay a $220 bill. $220
divided by 1238 would equal a fair share per member at
about 18 cents. Obviously not everyone is going to
contribute, but even so handling donations each year is a
hassle and then returning excess contributions is even
more of a hassle. A few people will probably carry this
group if we need to go premium again.
Before we get too involved in the logistics of paying for
premium status, the question is whether or not we need the
additional storage. Our photo uploads are sized down to
screen width (1024 pixels) to save space. I transferred
the photos and normally would have set the size at 1024
pixels at that time. I checked and it appears that was
what happened as one photo I checked was downsized from
974 kb to 244kb. We could also thin our files some to
weed out the chaff. It wouldn't be much effort if the
posters could edit their own folders. I am listed as the
owner of any folders where an owner couldn't be
identified, Usually that is because they dropped out of
the group, but might be the result of an email change.
They might be prime candidates for thinning.
I am not sure we need to do anything now though, as it
will take us a while to use up the 200 megabytes. That
244kb photo is typical of the largest size photos that
fill the screen. It would take us just over 800 photos of
that size to fill our remaining space.
Dale
|
|

Jeffrey L Witt
There is certainly so OLD content from the Yahoo early days that by now has been included in my web sites. I will take some time and remove it, but it may not add up to a whole lot.
Jeff
|
|
Can someone please advise exactly where I can find this file of 78 high resolution photos of surviving G&D locomotives. I looked at gdlines.info, and I am possibly just missing this file when I look. Thanks.
|
|

Jeffrey L Witt
|
|

Jeffrey L Witt
OK, I went through it and deleted any duplicate content that I owned.
Note that there is stuff I couldn't delete, duplicates uploaded by people other than me. I am not an admin for this group, so couldn't delete them.
If in doubt, let me know before deleting in case I am missing something, unless we get to a crisis level.
Jeff
|
|
I have found, mostly on other groups, that emailed photos can
take more storage space than they should. This is a result of
posters inadvertently including the originally posted photo in
their response, which results in duplication of the photo. Many
email client programs strip off attachments in a response, but if
the photo was embedded or inserted into the message they might
not, so you should delete any such photos if you see them in your
response. I don't think this is a big problem for GandD, but I
will take a look when I get a chance and delete subsequent
appearances of the same photo in the emailed photos folder.
There is also a nice feature of the emailed photos folder in
groups.io. If you click on the thumbnail to view the photo, down
at the bottom there is a link that will take you to the message
that posted it. Having only the originally posted photo makes
that more usable as it will send you to the message of the person
who initially posted it and probably gave more information about
it.
Dale
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On 3/9/2020 7:19 AM, Jeffrey L Witt via
Groups.Io wrote:
There is certainly so OLD content from the Yahoo early days that
by now has been included in my web sites. I will take some time
and remove it, but it may not add up to a whole lot.
Jeff
|
|