Date   
Re: PayPal Bill for GPSL

John Dinneen
 

Thanks for all you are doing here, Paul.

Really looking forward to seeing Idaho again!

 

Email below for paypal transactions.

 

73

 

John F Dinneen KCØL

john.dinneen@...

Home: 469.362.1942

Cell:    214.797.3399

 

From: GPSL@groups.io <GPSL@groups.io> On Behalf Of L. Paul Verhage KD4STH
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 12:10 PM
To: GPSL@groups.io; Nick Hanks <ndhanks@...>; Bill Ebener <BEbener@...>
Subject: [GPSL] PayPal Bill for GPSL

 

I am going to send payment requests for GPSL to people who I see are registered. However, I will need your preferred email address. So if you're on my list, please contact me directly so I can send the email. By the way, please let me know if I don't have you or a spouse registered.

 

Thanks

 

John Kovac

Edward Kovac

Jerry Gable

Beth Gable

Jim Emert

Mike Moody

Nick Banks

John Dinneen

Michael West

Chris Krengel

Chris Rodriguez

Jim Langsted

Bill Ebener

 

Re: PayPal Bill for GPSL

John Kovac KM6GKF
 

Hi Paul, 

You can send the invoice for my son Edward and me to this email, jkovac@...

Thanks! 

On May 24, 2018, at 10:09 AM, L. Paul Verhage KD4STH <nearsys@...> wrote:

I am going to send payment requests for GPSL to people who I see are registered. However, I will need your preferred email address. So if you're on my list, please contact me directly so I can send the email. By the way, please let me know if I don't have you or a spouse registered.

Thanks

John Kovac
Edward Kovac
Jerry Gable
Beth Gable
Jim Emert
Mike Moody
Nick Banks
John Dinneen
Michael West
Chris Krengel
Chris Rodriguez
Jim Langsted
Bill Ebener

PayPal Bill for GPSL

L. Paul Verhage KD4STH
 

I am going to send payment requests for GPSL to people who I see are registered. However, I will need your preferred email address. So if you're on my list, please contact me directly so I can send the email. By the way, please let me know if I don't have you or a spouse registered.

Thanks

John Kovac
Edward Kovac
Jerry Gable
Beth Gable
Jim Emert
Mike Moody
Nick Banks
John Dinneen
Michael West
Chris Krengel
Chris Rodriguez
Jim Langsted
Bill Ebener

Re: NSTAR 18-A, finally

L. Paul Verhage KD4STH
 

Good luck on the flight.

On May 23, 2018 1:58 PM, "Mark Conner N9XTN" <mconner1@...> wrote:
Hoping to fly NSTAR 18-A this Sunday at 0900 CT (1400 UTC).  Launch site is going to be dependent on last-minute forecasts - the surface and upper winds are forecast to be very light, except above 70,000' or so, so our burst altitude uncertainty is the biggest factor in our landing zone.  We could come down almost any direction in a 10-12 mile radius from launch.

If possible I'd like to launch from my home in Valley NE, but the terrain along (and in) the Platte River is not favorable for recoveries due to trees and difficult access, and a short flight gives us a good chance of coming down in that area.  More than likely we will move the launch site to Kennard NE, which gives us a pretty good area all around to work with.  

APRS will be on 144.36 MHz with call N9XTN-11 and 144.39 with N9XTN-12.  I will try to do a live Periscope on Twitter (@N9XTN) for our recovery.  

73 de Mark N9XTN

NSTAR 18-A, finally

Mark Conner N9XTN
 

Hoping to fly NSTAR 18-A this Sunday at 0900 CT (1400 UTC).  Launch site is going to be dependent on last-minute forecasts - the surface and upper winds are forecast to be very light, except above 70,000' or so, so our burst altitude uncertainty is the biggest factor in our landing zone.  We could come down almost any direction in a 10-12 mile radius from launch.

If possible I'd like to launch from my home in Valley NE, but the terrain along (and in) the Platte River is not favorable for recoveries due to trees and difficult access, and a short flight gives us a good chance of coming down in that area.  More than likely we will move the launch site to Kennard NE, which gives us a pretty good area all around to work with.  

APRS will be on 144.36 MHz with call N9XTN-11 and 144.39 with N9XTN-12.  I will try to do a live Periscope on Twitter (@N9XTN) for our recovery.  

73 de Mark N9XTN

Speakers?

L. Paul Verhage KD4STH
 

I'm looking for a list of speakers and presentations for the conference. Please email me if you have a topic that you would like to percent on. Thanks

360 degree picture from 35km altitude

dampguy
 

I finally managed to get a nice stitch together  :)

Spearkers and Topics

L. Paul Verhage KD4STH
 

Please email me if you have a presentation you would like to give at GPSL.

Thanks

GPSL

L. Paul Verhage KD4STH
 

This week I will be sending PayPal bills to attendees. Please get registered if you plan to attend.

Registration for GPSL

Zack Clobes W0ZC
 

If you haven't already, please register for GPSL.  This year it's a two-step process:

First, register your group:

(Currently we have: Pale Blue Dots, PENS, Go Eagles, EOSS * 2)


Secondly, register the individuals:

(Currently we have: John & Edward Kovac, Jerry & Beth Gable, Jim Emmert, and Mike Moody)


If you have any questions, please direct them towards me.


Zack Clobes, W0ZC
Project: Traveler
www.projecttraveler.org

Join us on Facebook for the latest information:



Project: Traveler is a research project of Custom Digital Services, LLC.

Straight Outta Near Space

L. Paul Verhage KD4STH
 

New design attached

Re: Images from a Balloon Launch

L. Paul Verhage KD4STH
 

That's what I'm finding also. Raleigh scattering is strongest for the shortest wavelengths of light. So infrared light penetrates the air as if was nonexistent.

On May 20, 2018 8:54 AM, "Joe WB9SBD" <nss@...> wrote:
Perfect!

We did the same geez 20+ years ago with a Live ATV flight. With a small CCD Camera that was big sensitivity in the Infrared.

We did not change anything in the camera, But we did use our rotating mirror system that use a mirror that had a special coating to reflect the infrared and longer freqs, and do whatever with the others.

The mirror sadly was just slightly not big enough so in the corners of the field of view we saw the straight out natural  view as the camera would normally see, and in the middle 90% was the off the mirror with the long only wavelengths seen.

The difference was incredible! The contrast was un describeable in the filtered image. Then at altitude, the usual in color images the Blue haze that washes out all the details, in that filtered image was stunning! the long waves penetrated that blue haze and the details seen on the ground were incredible!

Joe WB9SBD

The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com

On 5/20/2018 9:28 AM, L. Paul Verhage KD4STH wrote:
The imagers in digital cameras are sensitive to IR, especially to that region just beyond red. So I placed two complementary theater gels over the lens to block pretty much all visible light. The light that gets through and is recorded is near infrared.

Chlorophyll absorbs red and blue light for energy and reflects green and near infrared. So NIR images show healthy plants as very bright. 

On May 20, 2018 8:19 AM, "Joe WB9SBD" <nss@...> wrote:
So with the monochrome filtered image, what frequencies were you intending to record?

Joe WB9SBD

The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com

On 5/20/2018 8:06 AM, L. Paul Verhage KD4STH wrote:
I launched two balloons for Open Window School on Friday. Attached are two of the nicer pictures.

The color image was taken with an Apeman A60 camera set to record images every 10 seconds. The camera is like an affordable GoPro. The gray scale image is a Near infrared image taken by a Mobius ActionCam set to monochrome. It's hot mirror has been removed and visible light is blocked with a dark blue and dark red theater gels. 

The camera combination works well together. Now to see if I can use Wood's glass to block visible light but let ultraviolet light reach the imager.


Re: Images from a Balloon Launch

Joe WB9SBD
 

Perfect!

We did the same geez 20+ years ago with a Live ATV flight. With a small CCD Camera that was big sensitivity in the Infrared.

We did not change anything in the camera, But we did use our rotating mirror system that use a mirror that had a special coating to reflect the infrared and longer freqs, and do whatever with the others.

The mirror sadly was just slightly not big enough so in the corners of the field of view we saw the straight out natural  view as the camera would normally see, and in the middle 90% was the off the mirror with the long only wavelengths seen.

The difference was incredible! The contrast was un describeable in the filtered image. Then at altitude, the usual in color images the Blue haze that washes out all the details, in that filtered image was stunning! the long waves penetrated that blue haze and the details seen on the ground were incredible!

Joe WB9SBD

The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com

On 5/20/2018 9:28 AM, L. Paul Verhage KD4STH wrote:
The imagers in digital cameras are sensitive to IR, especially to that region just beyond red. So I placed two complementary theater gels over the lens to block pretty much all visible light. The light that gets through and is recorded is near infrared.

Chlorophyll absorbs red and blue light for energy and reflects green and near infrared. So NIR images show healthy plants as very bright. 

On May 20, 2018 8:19 AM, "Joe WB9SBD" <nss@...> wrote:
So with the monochrome filtered image, what frequencies were you intending to record?

Joe WB9SBD

The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com

On 5/20/2018 8:06 AM, L. Paul Verhage KD4STH wrote:
I launched two balloons for Open Window School on Friday. Attached are two of the nicer pictures.

The color image was taken with an Apeman A60 camera set to record images every 10 seconds. The camera is like an affordable GoPro. The gray scale image is a Near infrared image taken by a Mobius ActionCam set to monochrome. It's hot mirror has been removed and visible light is blocked with a dark blue and dark red theater gels. 

The camera combination works well together. Now to see if I can use Wood's glass to block visible light but let ultraviolet light reach the imager.


Re: Images from a Balloon Launch

L. Paul Verhage KD4STH
 

The imagers in digital cameras are sensitive to IR, especially to that region just beyond red. So I placed two complementary theater gels over the lens to block pretty much all visible light. The light that gets through and is recorded is near infrared.

Chlorophyll absorbs red and blue light for energy and reflects green and near infrared. So NIR images show healthy plants as very bright. 

On May 20, 2018 8:19 AM, "Joe WB9SBD" <nss@...> wrote:
So with the monochrome filtered image, what frequencies were you intending to record?

Joe WB9SBD

The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com

On 5/20/2018 8:06 AM, L. Paul Verhage KD4STH wrote:
I launched two balloons for Open Window School on Friday. Attached are two of the nicer pictures.

The color image was taken with an Apeman A60 camera set to record images every 10 seconds. The camera is like an affordable GoPro. The gray scale image is a Near infrared image taken by a Mobius ActionCam set to monochrome. It's hot mirror has been removed and visible light is blocked with a dark blue and dark red theater gels. 

The camera combination works well together. Now to see if I can use Wood's glass to block visible light but let ultraviolet light reach the imager.

Re: Images from a Balloon Launch

Joe WB9SBD
 

So with the monochrome filtered image, what frequencies were you intending to record?

Joe WB9SBD

The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com

On 5/20/2018 8:06 AM, L. Paul Verhage KD4STH wrote:
I launched two balloons for Open Window School on Friday. Attached are two of the nicer pictures.

The color image was taken with an Apeman A60 camera set to record images every 10 seconds. The camera is like an affordable GoPro. The gray scale image is a Near infrared image taken by a Mobius ActionCam set to monochrome. It's hot mirror has been removed and visible light is blocked with a dark blue and dark red theater gels. 

The camera combination works well together. Now to see if I can use Wood's glass to block visible light but let ultraviolet light reach the imager.

Re: Images from a Balloon Launch

John Kovac KM6GKF
 

Cool images!

On May 20, 2018, at 6:06 AM, L. Paul Verhage KD4STH <nearsys@...> wrote:

I launched two balloons for Open Window School on Friday. Attached are two of the nicer pictures.

The color image was taken with an Apeman A60 camera set to record images every 10 seconds. The camera is like an affordable GoPro. The gray scale image is a Near infrared image taken by a Mobius ActionCam set to monochrome. It's hot mirror has been removed and visible light is blocked with a dark blue and dark red theater gels. 

The camera combination works well together. Now to see if I can use Wood's glass to block visible light but let ultraviolet light reach the imager.
<BsatBurst1611.JPG>
<NIR IMAG0977.JPG>

Images from a Balloon Launch

L. Paul Verhage KD4STH
 

I launched two balloons for Open Window School on Friday. Attached are two of the nicer pictures.

The color image was taken with an Apeman A60 camera set to record images every 10 seconds. The camera is like an affordable GoPro. The gray scale image is a Near infrared image taken by a Mobius ActionCam set to monochrome. It's hot mirror has been removed and visible light is blocked with a dark blue and dark red theater gels. 

The camera combination works well together. Now to see if I can use Wood's glass to block visible light but let ultraviolet light reach the imager.

Re: Slow-rising balloon over Lake Michigan

Christopher Rose
 

Great Lakes 2, Balloons 0.  Sorry this went down out there.

Chris

-----------------------------------------

From: "Dennis Klipa - N8ERF"
To: GPSL@groups.io
Cc:
Sent: Saturday May 19 2018 2:52:43AM
Subject: Re: [GPSL] Slow-rising balloon over Lake Michigan

Looks like a Saginaw Bay landing.  Sorry guys.  We might have retrieved it for you had it been on dry land.

Best Regards,
Dennis, N8ERF
Midland, MI

On Fri, May 18, 2018, 11:19 PM Zack Clobes W0ZC <zclobes@...> wrote:
The descent would have nearly coincided with the sun dropping low in the sky.  It wasn't sunset by any means, but I'm wondering if temperature had anything to do with it.

Zack

On Fri, May 18, 2018, 7:53 PM Mark Conner N9XTN <mconner1@...> wrote:
Very interesting - looks like it topped out about 78,500'.  Perhaps a slow leak?  It's too bad the individual packets aren't time stamped, as the aprs.fi packet log is a mess because of all the delays and dupes.  I'd like to download and graph the altitude and vertical speed, but it'd take quite a while to sort it all out.

73 de Mark N9XTN

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 5:59 PM, Zack Clobes W0ZC <zclobes@...> wrote:
It looks to be on a very slow decent now... back over land.


Zack Clobes, W0ZC
Project: Traveler
www.projecttraveler.org

Join us on Facebook for the latest information:



Project: Traveler is a research project of Custom Digital Services, LLC.


On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Mark Conner N9XTN <mconner1@...> wrote:
Best case is that the drift will continue back to the east far enough to burst and then land onshore in Michigan.  However, the winds about ~75 kft become pretty light and variable, so this may be asking a lot.

73 de Mark N9XTN


On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Christopher Rose <kb8uih88@...> wrote:
A school group I was with lost one in Lake Huron Canadian water recently. Didn't get to altitude fast enough. Launched from Mt. Pleasant, MI

Chris

-----------------------------------------

From: "Mark Conner N9XTN"
To: GPSL@groups.io
Cc:
Sent: Friday May 18 2018 3:01:21PM
Subject: [GPSL] Slow-rising balloon over Lake Michigan


Ascent rate is around 300 ft/min, current altitude about 48 kft.

73 de Mark N9XTN




Re: Slow-rising balloon over Lake Michigan

Dennis Klipa - N8ERF
 

Looks like a Saginaw Bay landing.  Sorry guys.  We might have retrieved it for you had it been on dry land.

Best Regards,
Dennis, N8ERF
Midland, MI

On Fri, May 18, 2018, 11:19 PM Zack Clobes W0ZC <zclobes@...> wrote:
The descent would have nearly coincided with the sun dropping low in the sky.  It wasn't sunset by any means, but I'm wondering if temperature had anything to do with it.

Zack

On Fri, May 18, 2018, 7:53 PM Mark Conner N9XTN <mconner1@...> wrote:
Very interesting - looks like it topped out about 78,500'.  Perhaps a slow leak?  It's too bad the individual packets aren't time stamped, as the aprs.fi packet log is a mess because of all the delays and dupes.  I'd like to download and graph the altitude and vertical speed, but it'd take quite a while to sort it all out.

73 de Mark N9XTN

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 5:59 PM, Zack Clobes W0ZC <zclobes@...> wrote:
It looks to be on a very slow decent now... back over land.


Zack Clobes, W0ZC
Project: Traveler
www.projecttraveler.org

Join us on Facebook for the latest information:



Project: Traveler is a research project of Custom Digital Services, LLC.


On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Mark Conner N9XTN <mconner1@...> wrote:
Best case is that the drift will continue back to the east far enough to burst and then land onshore in Michigan.  However, the winds about ~75 kft become pretty light and variable, so this may be asking a lot.

73 de Mark N9XTN


On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Christopher Rose <kb8uih88@...> wrote:
A school group I was with lost one in Lake Huron Canadian water recently. Didn't get to altitude fast enough. Launched from Mt. Pleasant, MI

Chris

-----------------------------------------

From: "Mark Conner N9XTN"
To: GPSL@groups.io
Cc:
Sent: Friday May 18 2018 3:01:21PM
Subject: [GPSL] Slow-rising balloon over Lake Michigan


Ascent rate is around 300 ft/min, current altitude about 48 kft.

73 de Mark N9XTN




Re: Slow-rising balloon over Lake Michigan

Mark Conner N9XTN
 

Could be.  The cold after dark may have zapped the battery too.  Hopefully it'll come to life tomorrow and can us know where it landed.

- Mark

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:19 PM, Zack Clobes W0ZC <zclobes@...> wrote:
The descent would have nearly coincided with the sun dropping low in the sky.  It wasn't sunset by any means, but I'm wondering if temperature had anything to do with it.

Zack

On Fri, May 18, 2018, 7:53 PM Mark Conner N9XTN <mconner1@...> wrote:
Very interesting - looks like it topped out about 78,500'.  Perhaps a slow leak?  It's too bad the individual packets aren't time stamped, as the aprs.fi packet log is a mess because of all the delays and dupes.  I'd like to download and graph the altitude and vertical speed, but it'd take quite a while to sort it all out.

73 de Mark N9XTN

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 5:59 PM, Zack Clobes W0ZC <zclobes@...> wrote:
It looks to be on a very slow decent now... back over land.


Zack Clobes, W0ZC
Project: Traveler
www.projecttraveler.org

Join us on Facebook for the latest information:



Project: Traveler is a research project of Custom Digital Services, LLC.


On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Mark Conner N9XTN <mconner1@...> wrote:
Best case is that the drift will continue back to the east far enough to burst and then land onshore in Michigan.  However, the winds about ~75 kft become pretty light and variable, so this may be asking a lot.

73 de Mark N9XTN


On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Christopher Rose <kb8uih88@...> wrote:
A school group I was with lost one in Lake Huron Canadian water recently. Didn't get to altitude fast enough. Launched from Mt. Pleasant, MI

Chris

-----------------------------------------

From: "Mark Conner N9XTN"
To: GPSL@groups.io
Cc:
Sent: Friday May 18 2018 3:01:21PM
Subject: [GPSL] Slow-rising balloon over Lake Michigan


Ascent rate is around 300 ft/min, current altitude about 48 kft.

73 de Mark N9XTN