|
TrackSoar
I'm testing a TrackSoar APRS tracker before near space season begins in earnest. If you haven't seen one of these, it's a small board with GPS, GPS antenna, transmitter, Arduino, and two meter
I'm testing a TrackSoar APRS tracker before near space season begins in earnest. If you haven't seen one of these, it's a small board with GPS, GPS antenna, transmitter, Arduino, and two meter
|
By
L. Paul Verhage KD4STH
·
#16950
·
|
|
Re: MAX-M8Q GPS lock problem
You don't need RFI interference in GPS L1 band to disable GPS.
Ublox MAX-8Q and all other MAX series modules do not have *any* antenna input preselector filtering - just an impedance match. Their
You don't need RFI interference in GPS L1 band to disable GPS.
Ublox MAX-8Q and all other MAX series modules do not have *any* antenna input preselector filtering - just an impedance match. Their
|
By
Leo Bodnar <leo@...>
·
#16949
·
|
|
Re: MAX-M8Q GPS lock problem
Hi Zack,
Digital cameras are a huge source of EMI to desense GPS receivers. I always try to keep about 6 to 10 feet of isolation between GPS trackers and camera payloads. Aluminum shielding on the
Hi Zack,
Digital cameras are a huge source of EMI to desense GPS receivers. I always try to keep about 6 to 10 feet of isolation between GPS trackers and camera payloads. Aluminum shielding on the
|
By
Bill Brown
·
#16948
·
|
|
Re: MAX-M8Q GPS lock problem
Troubleshooting EMI can be fun... try doing this while at an FCC lab where the clock is ticking $$$ and you are calculating beat frequencies on almost unrelated things in a system to get a clue
Troubleshooting EMI can be fun... try doing this while at an FCC lab where the clock is ticking $$$ and you are calculating beat frequencies on almost unrelated things in a system to get a clue
|
By
Michael
·
#16947
·
|
|
Re: MAX-M8Q GPS lock problem
Most of my testing that I did was with the cameras powered down.
That's what is throwing me on this one - sensor seems to cause problems so I yank that, then it seems like the cameras are doing it,
Most of my testing that I did was with the cameras powered down.
That's what is throwing me on this one - sensor seems to cause problems so I yank that, then it seems like the cameras are doing it,
|
By
Zack Clobes W0ZC
·
#16946
·
|
|
Re: MAX-M8Q GPS lock problem
I second Micheal's advice. I once had an EMI issue with a GoPro camera not allowing a GPS lock. My solution involved the cover from an Altoids tin. Once I had enough metal between the GPS unit the
I second Micheal's advice. I once had an EMI issue with a GoPro camera not allowing a GPS lock. My solution involved the cover from an Altoids tin. Once I had enough metal between the GPS unit the
|
By
Jeff Ducklow
·
#16945
·
|
|
Re: MAX-M8Q GPS lock problem
Looks like you have an EMI issue, try wrapping the cameras with aluminum foil with just a small hole for the lens as small as you can get it without interfering with the view. Most likely your cameras
Looks like you have an EMI issue, try wrapping the cameras with aluminum foil with just a small hole for the lens as small as you can get it without interfering with the view. Most likely your cameras
|
By
Michael
·
#16944
·
|
|
MAX-M8Q GPS lock problem
I'm looking for some ideas on troubleshooting some lock problems on a new board/capsule/camera design. The board has worked well during testing up until I started integration testing with the actual
I'm looking for some ideas on troubleshooting some lock problems on a new board/capsule/camera design. The board has worked well during testing up until I started integration testing with the actual
|
By
Zack Clobes W0ZC
·
#16943
·
|
|
Re: GPSL Registration
Hi Mike
Leigh (VE5LEE) and I (VE5BNC) had hoped to attend but, in a fit of wander lust, ended up booking a trip around Europe in June. GPSL is a ton of fun but Amsterdam, Prague, Vienna, Venice and
Hi Mike
Leigh (VE5LEE) and I (VE5BNC) had hoped to attend but, in a fit of wander lust, ended up booking a trip around Europe in June. GPSL is a ton of fun but Amsterdam, Prague, Vienna, Venice and
|
By
Bruce Coates
·
#16942
·
|
|
GPSL Registration
GPSL 2019 registration is now open and available. Please go to “superlaunch.org” for details on hotels, registration fees, and group dinners. Hope to see you all in Pella, IA on June 13, 14
GPSL 2019 registration is now open and available. Please go to “superlaunch.org” for details on hotels, registration fees, and group dinners. Hope to see you all in Pella, IA on June 13, 14
|
By
Mike, n0mpm
·
#16941
·
|
|
GPS Rollover
https://www.energy.gov/oe/articles/april-2019-global-positioning-system-gps-week-number-rollover
https://www.energy.gov/oe/articles/april-2019-global-positioning-system-gps-week-number-rollover
|
By
Harry M
·
#16940
·
|
|
LightAPRS Tracker
Hi,
Three years ago I was googling about high altitude balloons and I ended up with pico (floater) balloon projects. I was really impressed with some amateur radio operators efforts to circumnavigate
Hi,
Three years ago I was googling about high altitude balloons and I ended up with pico (floater) balloon projects. I was really impressed with some amateur radio operators efforts to circumnavigate
|
By
Mustafa Tan
·
#16939
·
|
|
Re: Frequency selection for airborne cross band repeaters
One thing i think works well, if you are part of a ham club that has a working repeater. Is to put your balloon repeater output frequency the same as your clubs repeater output frequency. That way
One thing i think works well, if you are part of a ham club that has a working repeater. Is to put your balloon repeater output frequency the same as your clubs repeater output frequency. That way
|
By
Carlton Corbitt
·
#16938
·
|
|
Re: Frequency selection for airborne crossband repeaters
Also since you are running ATV, if you are flying a GPS unit, try to separate it as far as possible from the ATV system, I have had both the transmitters and even just the video
Also since you are running ATV, if you are flying a GPS unit, try to separate it as far as possible from the ATV system, I have had both the transmitters and even just the video
|
By
Joe WB9SBD
·
#16937
·
|
|
Re: Frequency selection for airborne crossband repeaters
Mike,
As I and others have stated forget about the repeater co-oridinators. You say up state NY. how about 600 miles away? or at least 3 to 4 hundred because that is what your
Mike,
As I and others have stated forget about the repeater co-oridinators. You say up state NY. how about 600 miles away? or at least 3 to 4 hundred because that is what your
|
By
Joe WB9SBD
·
#16936
·
|
|
Re: Frequency selection for airborne crossband repeaters
I would go with the 500 mW setting since it will likely have a high duty cycle and could overheat, even at 500 mW it could still overheat so try to mount the module on a good heatsink. Since you are
I would go with the 500 mW setting since it will likely have a high duty cycle and could overheat, even at 500 mW it could still overheat so try to mount the module on a good heatsink. Since you are
|
By
Bill Brown
·
#16935
·
|
|
Re: Frequency selection for airborne crossband repeaters
Well, I pulled the spreadsheet kept by the Upstate New York Repeater coordinators, and found a few frequencies that seem clear - 144.580 input, 447.025 output.
I'm
Well, I pulled the spreadsheet kept by the Upstate New York Repeater coordinators, and found a few frequencies that seem clear - 144.580 input, 447.025 output.
I'm
|
By
Michael Hojnowski
·
#16934
·
|
|
Re: Frequency selection for airborne cross band repeaters
A couple of things come to mind.
The most important choice is the input freq as, not long after you launch, you'll be receiving any/all transmissions within hundreds of miles with no easy way to
A couple of things come to mind.
The most important choice is the input freq as, not long after you launch, you'll be receiving any/all transmissions within hundreds of miles with no easy way to
|
By
Barry
·
#16933
·
|
|
Re: Frequency selection for airborne crossband repeaters
I agree with Bill on that Pairing.
FORGET repeater co-coordinators. We used them on the very first repeater flight ever.Way back in like 1989 or so. And They just
I agree with Bill on that Pairing.
FORGET repeater co-coordinators. We used them on the very first repeater flight ever.Way back in like 1989 or so. And They just
|
By
Joe WB9SBD
·
#16932
·
|
|
Re: Frequency selection for airborne crossband repeaters
I typically use 446.025 and 144.340. Both are simplex. For a simplex repeater i use 144.340.
-Bill WB8ELK
I typically use 446.025 and 144.340. Both are simplex. For a simplex repeater i use 144.340.
-Bill WB8ELK
|
By
Bill Brown
·
#16931
·
|