toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I encourage use of eQSL as well. I chase the Japan Amateur Radio
League (JARL) awards and they only recognize eQSL and not LOTW.
They want you to be able to print out the QSL card. They have a
great program, if you have not looked into it, give it a go.
ClubLog has become important to fans of the IOTA Program,
offering island credit for log matches posted to their site. It
worth posting your adi files here.
73 Alan WL7CG
On 4/6/19 9:49 AM, Richard Kennedy
Have you ever worked a new, somewhat elusive or rare grid, only
to find that the station you worked does not QSL in any manner
whatsoever: no LoTW, no eQSL, no paper QSL. Any there is no
email address to even communicate with him/her?
About 1 percent of all new grids/prefixes fall into the category
of "no confirmation likely". One saving grace to all of this is
that folks who once were "Zero QSLers" convert and upload their
logs to one of the QSL services recognized by GAPAwards. This
happened recently to me with a Russian in an elusive grid that I
happened to work in 2014. When I did my daily download of LoTW
confirmations there he was!! Two years ago a similar incident
took place: a QSO from 2002 with Indonesia confirmed via LoTW
for a new grid.
That's why I talk up LoTW and eQSL primarily, as well as ClubLog
(seems popular with Europeans and some Japanese) and even HRD.
LoTW, ClubLog, HRD and others are free - eQSL is a dollar a
You can maximize your grid/prefix count by subscribing to
multiple QSL services. Check with Ernie if you have questions
on exactly what a "GAPA confirmation" is.
GL, 73, Rich, K3VAT