#intro #intro


Matt Corwin
 

no depression in mine



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Antonio Martinez <middleriverstudio@...>
Date: 5/3/20 2:49 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Flicka20@groups.io
Subject: Re: [Flicka20] #intro

Your comment about the depression in the tabernacle is VERY interesting and if true (it was the mold), encouraging as I assumed it was 40 years of compressive forces on ours.  That concavity and the failing sealant on 4 mast step screws, was causing an occasional water intrusion issue.  I just recently  sanded the gelcoat off in that area, and added cloth/resin to get it level.

a

s/v Miracle


On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 1:58 PM Morris London <morris_london@...> wrote:
I was down at the boat this morning, and fortunately read the email before going.  I took some measurements on my boat, #242 a 1983 model.  The following conditions apply, so your mileage may vary:

  1.  I have added a hinge under the mast tabernacle, and this raised the entire rig.  The hinge itself is about 1 1/8 inch in height.  However, there is a depression in the deck in the area of the tabernacle, and the hinge spans over this depression, so the effect is probably closer to 1 1/4 or 1 3/8 inch.  I have noted this same depression in photos of other boats, so I think it's in the mold, not just my boat.  If you don't have a hinge, your measurements should be less by 1 1/4 to 1 3/8 inch.
  2. My mast is raked at the 1 3/4 degrees (~10" aft at the mast head) specified on the drawings from '82 that I got with the boat.  If your rake is different the angle will change the height a bit.  An inch additional rake at the masthead would imply about 3/8 inch less clearance at the boom end.
  3. I adjusted the boom to be perpendicular to the mast (not necessarily level to the cabin or cockpit soles).
  4. My boat's deck mold does not have the integral engine hatch.  At the time my and your boats were built what they did for inboard engine installations was cut a large hole in the sole over the engine and install another fiberglass assembly with the engine hatch in it on top of the sole.  The assembly was fastened to the sole with numerous bolts all the way around the cockpit just inboard of the drainage grooves.  If you have an inboard engine you have the additional assembly.  This will add some height to the cockpit sole and thus reduce the measurement to the boom, but I don't know by how much.  If you have the assembly you should be able to remove the engine access hatch and possibly see the cut edge of the deck mold sole.  You could then measure the difference due to the added assembly.  If you have an outboard, as I do, your deck will be the same as mine.
  5. I have Kenyan spars, and they match the drawings.  The most important measurement for comparison to measurements you take of your spars is that the CL of the boom and its gooseneck fitting on the mast are 17 inches from the bottom the mast.
  6. My boat has the teak and holly sole in the cabin. This adds an additional 1/4" to the cabin sole and applies to a second measurement I give you below.
With all that in mind,  I measured the height from the cockpit sole to the bottom of the boom, at the aft end of the spar extrusion (not the endcap with the sheaves in it), to be 55 3/8 inches.  This does not include the bale for the main sheet tackle.  The point is just forward of the outboard engine fuel tank locker, if you have one of those.

Because you're looking at a dodger, a useful measurement might also be further forward in the area of the hatch.  I measured from the cabin sole to the bottom of the boom just aft of the outhaul cleat (~45 inches aft of the mast), which was pretty close to the main hatch in its fully open location, to be 86 7/8 inches.  If you don't have the teak and holly sole (most do but there are plenty out there without) your measurement would be 1/4" greater (after correcting for the hinge!).  Speaking of outhaul cleat, don't forget it protrudes below the boom another 1 inch, and depending on your dodger design may be over the dodger when the boom is in over the boat.

That's a whole lot of verbiage to deliver a couple measurements (only one that you actually asked for), and the precision of the measurements is ridiculously tight.  But, fitting a dodger or bimini to such a small boat can get down to measurements of less than an inch.

Unfortunately the sails are not on the boat right now.  If they had been I'd have taken measurements with the main raised, since that's what will determine the actual location of the boom underway.

Hope this helps.

Morris London
"Golden Crown"

From: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io> on behalf of svheron35@... <svheron35@...>
Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2020 7:35 AM
To: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io>
Subject: [Flicka20] #intro
 
I have recently bought hull #162, and will be sailing out of East Boothbay, Maine.  My first job is to replace the bowsprit which had some soft spots.  The old one is off and I am building a new one of douglas fir.  I am sure I will have lots of questions and need for advice along the way.  I will be adding and upgrading some electronics and hope, come fall, to sail her down to the Chesapeake and maybe points south.  Right now I would also like to build a dodger frame for her.  The mast may be down for another 4 to 6 weeks which makes taking measurements for its height doable but difficult.  That is why I was hoping someone might help me out by providing a measurement of the height from the cockpit sole to the bottom of the boom.  It will take me a while to build the frame and then make the dodger and would like to get started pretty soon.  Still chilly here in Maine and a good time to be doing some sewing.  Thanks for any help.
Tim S.


Matt Corwin
 

interior also in good shape, I am pretty sure that you would find several thicknesses of plywood inside the step that are rotted. It's not such a hard job to fix if the cabin top core is not involved.

Matt 



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: "Matt Corwin via groups.io" <bongogram@...>
Date: 5/4/20 5:21 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Flicka20@groups.io
Subject: Re: [Flicka20] #intro

no depression in mine



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Antonio Martinez <middleriverstudio@...>
Date: 5/3/20 2:49 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Flicka20@groups.io
Subject: Re: [Flicka20] #intro

Your comment about the depression in the tabernacle is VERY interesting and if true (it was the mold), encouraging as I assumed it was 40 years of compressive forces on ours.  That concavity and the failing sealant on 4 mast step screws, was causing an occasional water intrusion issue.  I just recently  sanded the gelcoat off in that area, and added cloth/resin to get it level.

a

s/v Miracle


On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 1:58 PM Morris London <morris_london@...> wrote:
I was down at the boat this morning, and fortunately read the email before going.  I took some measurements on my boat, #242 a 1983 model.  The following conditions apply, so your mileage may vary:

  1.  I have added a hinge under the mast tabernacle, and this raised the entire rig.  The hinge itself is about 1 1/8 inch in height.  However, there is a depression in the deck in the area of the tabernacle, and the hinge spans over this depression, so the effect is probably closer to 1 1/4 or 1 3/8 inch.  I have noted this same depression in photos of other boats, so I think it's in the mold, not just my boat.  If you don't have a hinge, your measurements should be less by 1 1/4 to 1 3/8 inch.
  2. My mast is raked at the 1 3/4 degrees (~10" aft at the mast head) specified on the drawings from '82 that I got with the boat.  If your rake is different the angle will change the height a bit.  An inch additional rake at the masthead would imply about 3/8 inch less clearance at the boom end.
  3. I adjusted the boom to be perpendicular to the mast (not necessarily level to the cabin or cockpit soles).
  4. My boat's deck mold does not have the integral engine hatch.  At the time my and your boats were built what they did for inboard engine installations was cut a large hole in the sole over the engine and install another fiberglass assembly with the engine hatch in it on top of the sole.  The assembly was fastened to the sole with numerous bolts all the way around the cockpit just inboard of the drainage grooves.  If you have an inboard engine you have the additional assembly.  This will add some height to the cockpit sole and thus reduce the measurement to the boom, but I don't know by how much.  If you have the assembly you should be able to remove the engine access hatch and possibly see the cut edge of the deck mold sole.  You could then measure the difference due to the added assembly.  If you have an outboard, as I do, your deck will be the same as mine.
  5. I have Kenyan spars, and they match the drawings.  The most important measurement for comparison to measurements you take of your spars is that the CL of the boom and its gooseneck fitting on the mast are 17 inches from the bottom the mast.
  6. My boat has the teak and holly sole in the cabin. This adds an additional 1/4" to the cabin sole and applies to a second measurement I give you below.
With all that in mind,  I measured the height from the cockpit sole to the bottom of the boom, at the aft end of the spar extrusion (not the endcap with the sheaves in it), to be 55 3/8 inches.  This does not include the bale for the main sheet tackle.  The point is just forward of the outboard engine fuel tank locker, if you have one of those.

Because you're looking at a dodger, a useful measurement might also be further forward in the area of the hatch.  I measured from the cabin sole to the bottom of the boom just aft of the outhaul cleat (~45 inches aft of the mast), which was pretty close to the main hatch in its fully open location, to be 86 7/8 inches.  If you don't have the teak and holly sole (most do but there are plenty out there without) your measurement would be 1/4" greater (after correcting for the hinge!).  Speaking of outhaul cleat, don't forget it protrudes below the boom another 1 inch, and depending on your dodger design may be over the dodger when the boom is in over the boat.

That's a whole lot of verbiage to deliver a couple measurements (only one that you actually asked for), and the precision of the measurements is ridiculously tight.  But, fitting a dodger or bimini to such a small boat can get down to measurements of less than an inch.

Unfortunately the sails are not on the boat right now.  If they had been I'd have taken measurements with the main raised, since that's what will determine the actual location of the boom underway.

Hope this helps.

Morris London
"Golden Crown"

From: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io> on behalf of svheron35@... <svheron35@...>
Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2020 7:35 AM
To: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io>
Subject: [Flicka20] #intro
 
I have recently bought hull #162, and will be sailing out of East Boothbay, Maine.  My first job is to replace the bowsprit which had some soft spots.  The old one is off and I am building a new one of douglas fir.  I am sure I will have lots of questions and need for advice along the way.  I will be adding and upgrading some electronics and hope, come fall, to sail her down to the Chesapeake and maybe points south.  Right now I would also like to build a dodger frame for her.  The mast may be down for another 4 to 6 weeks which makes taking measurements for its height doable but difficult.  That is why I was hoping someone might help me out by providing a measurement of the height from the cockpit sole to the bottom of the boom.  It will take me a while to build the frame and then make the dodger and would like to get started pretty soon.  Still chilly here in Maine and a good time to be doing some sewing.  Thanks for any help.
Tim S.


Morris London
 

Very interesting indeed.  Maybe it is the compressive forces.  What year is your boat Matt?


From: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io> on behalf of Matt Corwin via groups.io <bongogram@...>
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 5:21 PM
To: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Flicka20] #intro
 
no depression in mine



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Antonio Martinez <middleriverstudio@...>
Date: 5/3/20 2:49 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Flicka20@groups.io
Subject: Re: [Flicka20] #intro

Your comment about the depression in the tabernacle is VERY interesting and if true (it was the mold), encouraging as I assumed it was 40 years of compressive forces on ours.  That concavity and the failing sealant on 4 mast step screws, was causing an occasional water intrusion issue.  I just recently  sanded the gelcoat off in that area, and added cloth/resin to get it level.

a

s/v Miracle


On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 1:58 PM Morris London <morris_london@...> wrote:
I was down at the boat this morning, and fortunately read the email before going.  I took some measurements on my boat, #242 a 1983 model.  The following conditions apply, so your mileage may vary:

  1.  I have added a hinge under the mast tabernacle, and this raised the entire rig.  The hinge itself is about 1 1/8 inch in height.  However, there is a depression in the deck in the area of the tabernacle, and the hinge spans over this depression, so the effect is probably closer to 1 1/4 or 1 3/8 inch.  I have noted this same depression in photos of other boats, so I think it's in the mold, not just my boat.  If you don't have a hinge, your measurements should be less by 1 1/4 to 1 3/8 inch.
  2. My mast is raked at the 1 3/4 degrees (~10" aft at the mast head) specified on the drawings from '82 that I got with the boat.  If your rake is different the angle will change the height a bit.  An inch additional rake at the masthead would imply about 3/8 inch less clearance at the boom end.
  3. I adjusted the boom to be perpendicular to the mast (not necessarily level to the cabin or cockpit soles).
  4. My boat's deck mold does not have the integral engine hatch.  At the time my and your boats were built what they did for inboard engine installations was cut a large hole in the sole over the engine and install another fiberglass assembly with the engine hatch in it on top of the sole.  The assembly was fastened to the sole with numerous bolts all the way around the cockpit just inboard of the drainage grooves.  If you have an inboard engine you have the additional assembly.  This will add some height to the cockpit sole and thus reduce the measurement to the boom, but I don't know by how much.  If you have the assembly you should be able to remove the engine access hatch and possibly see the cut edge of the deck mold sole.  You could then measure the difference due to the added assembly.  If you have an outboard, as I do, your deck will be the same as mine.
  5. I have Kenyan spars, and they match the drawings.  The most important measurement for comparison to measurements you take of your spars is that the CL of the boom and its gooseneck fitting on the mast are 17 inches from the bottom the mast.
  6. My boat has the teak and holly sole in the cabin. This adds an additional 1/4" to the cabin sole and applies to a second measurement I give you below.
With all that in mind,  I measured the height from the cockpit sole to the bottom of the boom, at the aft end of the spar extrusion (not the endcap with the sheaves in it), to be 55 3/8 inches.  This does not include the bale for the main sheet tackle.  The point is just forward of the outboard engine fuel tank locker, if you have one of those.

Because you're looking at a dodger, a useful measurement might also be further forward in the area of the hatch.  I measured from the cabin sole to the bottom of the boom just aft of the outhaul cleat (~45 inches aft of the mast), which was pretty close to the main hatch in its fully open location, to be 86 7/8 inches.  If you don't have the teak and holly sole (most do but there are plenty out there without) your measurement would be 1/4" greater (after correcting for the hinge!).  Speaking of outhaul cleat, don't forget it protrudes below the boom another 1 inch, and depending on your dodger design may be over the dodger when the boom is in over the boat.

That's a whole lot of verbiage to deliver a couple measurements (only one that you actually asked for), and the precision of the measurements is ridiculously tight.  But, fitting a dodger or bimini to such a small boat can get down to measurements of less than an inch.

Unfortunately the sails are not on the boat right now.  If they had been I'd have taken measurements with the main raised, since that's what will determine the actual location of the boom underway.

Hope this helps.

Morris London
"Golden Crown"

From: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io> on behalf of svheron35@... <svheron35@...>
Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2020 7:35 AM
To: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io>
Subject: [Flicka20] #intro
 
I have recently bought hull #162, and will be sailing out of East Boothbay, Maine.  My first job is to replace the bowsprit which had some soft spots.  The old one is off and I am building a new one of douglas fir.  I am sure I will have lots of questions and need for advice along the way.  I will be adding and upgrading some electronics and hope, come fall, to sail her down to the Chesapeake and maybe points south.  Right now I would also like to build a dodger frame for her.  The mast may be down for another 4 to 6 weeks which makes taking measurements for its height doable but difficult.  That is why I was hoping someone might help me out by providing a measurement of the height from the cockpit sole to the bottom of the boom.  It will take me a while to build the frame and then make the dodger and would like to get started pretty soon.  Still chilly here in Maine and a good time to be doing some sewing.  Thanks for any help.
Tim S.


Morris London
 

So measuring with the boom parallel to the cockpit sole does make more sense.  It takes the variation due to how people rake the mast out of it.  Measuring it that way I get 61 1/2 inches.  I'm not sure why mine is less than the others, especially given the added inch or so of the hinge, but it's another data point.

MLL



From: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io> on behalf of Jim roberts via groups.io <onemauijim@...>
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 2:26 PM
To: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Flicka20] #intro
 
66” on Sea Mouse, psc#5,
Cockpit sole non-opening.


On May 3, 2020, at 1:17 PM, Jim Hooker <jahooker@...> wrote:


On ours, with the boom parallel to the cockpit sole there is 64” under the boom. It may ride an inch or so higher with the sail up.

Jim Hooker
sv Niamh, #278
Detroit

On May 3, 2020, at 8:20 AM, gabriel warren <gabriel@...> wrote:

When Koremikre (#275) came to me, she had no dodger. She also had no sea hood, crucial for both dodger and solar panels. The original Pacific Seacraft is no more of course, but there is a reiteration in North Carolina. They have some of the original molds, including one for Flicka sea hoods. They whacked me $650, but it looks like it belongs there. As far as the dodger height, you can measure the height of the gooseneck and assume level. That being said, the cut of the main can vary, so the boom may be slightly up or down. My boom has an outhaul led to a cleat near the mast; I repurposed it into a topping lift, pretty important. Good luck.

Gabriel

On May 3, 2020, at 7:35 AM, svheron35@... wrote:

I have recently bought hull #162, and will be sailing out of East Boothbay, Maine.  My first job is to replace the bowsprit which had some soft spots.  The old one is off and I am building a new one of douglas fir.  I am sure I will have lots of questions and need for advice along the way.  I will be adding and upgrading some electronics and hope, come fall, to sail her down to the Chesapeake and maybe points south.  Right now I would also like to build a dodger frame for her.  The mast may be down for another 4 to 6 weeks which makes taking measurements for its height doable but difficult.  That is why I was hoping someone might help me out by providing a measurement of the height from the cockpit sole to the bottom of the boom.  It will take me a while to build the frame and then make the dodger and would like to get started pretty soon.  Still chilly here in Maine and a good time to be doing some sewing.  Thanks for any help.
Tim S.


GABRIEL WARREN-- SCULPTOR


720 King's Factory Rd
Charlestown
Rhode Island USA 02813
401.364.0087 

7984 Rt. 337
Antigonish Nova Scotia
B2G 2L1 Canada
902.863.5822






William Huesmann
 

For what it's worth, from the peanut gallery: on my Dana… 1989… Hull number 139… I had a compression (depression) at the mast step. My mast step looks nearly identical to the Flicka pictures and boats I have seen. On top of that step, I have a stainless steel plate with attachment points for blocks. Atop that, I have a hinged mast step to which the mast itself is attached with a single cross bolt. Over time… the construction of this mast step and the penetrations through it gave rise to  some depression. The reason for this was that the molded step was fiberglass, approximately 3/4 of an inch thick, followed by a piece of roughly 1/2 inch marine plywood, followed by the inside fiberglass shell from the cabin. The wood itself, over the course of 35 years, had a saturated and compressed. We drilled a 4 inch hole in the top, gouged out all the bad wood, filled it with an epoxy slurry of chopped strand fibers (kitty hair) the consistency of mayonnaise, and then allowed it four days to cure before replacing the step and hinge. I gained nearly 3/8 of an inch once we had ground the repair flush with the original step. And now, it is solid as a rock. That's just for what it's worth.  Not complicated...just time consuming.  The repair itself was quite simple.  

Bill Huesmann
S/V MORNING STAR (Dana 139)
Gulf Shores, AL

“Much as I love sailing, I'm not all that interested in going off sailing 'round the world --- tho there's those who certainly wish I would." <W. Huesmann>

On May 4, 2020, at 22:05, Morris London <morris_london@...> wrote:


So measuring with the boom parallel to the cockpit sole does make more sense.  It takes the variation due to how people rake the mast out of it.  Measuring it that way I get 61 1/2 inches.  I'm not sure why mine is less than the others, especially given the added inch or so of the hinge, but it's another data point.

MLL



From: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io> on behalf of Jim roberts via groups.io <onemauijim@...>
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 2:26 PM
To: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Flicka20] #intro
 
66” on Sea Mouse, psc#5,
Cockpit sole non-opening.


On May 3, 2020, at 1:17 PM, Jim Hooker <jahooker@...> wrote:


On ours, with the boom parallel to the cockpit sole there is 64” under the boom. It may ride an inch or so higher with the sail up.

Jim Hooker
sv Niamh, #278
Detroit

On May 3, 2020, at 8:20 AM, gabriel warren <gabriel@...> wrote:

When Koremikre (#275) came to me, she had no dodger. She also had no sea hood, crucial for both dodger and solar panels. The original Pacific Seacraft is no more of course, but there is a reiteration in North Carolina. They have some of the original molds, including one for Flicka sea hoods. They whacked me $650, but it looks like it belongs there. As far as the dodger height, you can measure the height of the gooseneck and assume level. That being said, the cut of the main can vary, so the boom may be slightly up or down. My boom has an outhaul led to a cleat near the mast; I repurposed it into a topping lift, pretty important. Good luck.

Gabriel

On May 3, 2020, at 7:35 AM, svheron35@... wrote:

I have recently bought hull #162, and will be sailing out of East Boothbay, Maine.  My first job is to replace the bowsprit which had some soft spots.  The old one is off and I am building a new one of douglas fir.  I am sure I will have lots of questions and need for advice along the way.  I will be adding and upgrading some electronics and hope, come fall, to sail her down to the Chesapeake and maybe points south.  Right now I would also like to build a dodger frame for her.  The mast may be down for another 4 to 6 weeks which makes taking measurements for its height doable but difficult.  That is why I was hoping someone might help me out by providing a measurement of the height from the cockpit sole to the bottom of the boom.  It will take me a while to build the frame and then make the dodger and would like to get started pretty soon.  Still chilly here in Maine and a good time to be doing some sewing.  Thanks for any help.
Tim S.


GABRIEL WARREN-- SCULPTOR


720 King's Factory Rd
Charlestown
Rhode Island USA 02813
401.364.0087 

7984 Rt. 337
Antigonish Nova Scotia
B2G 2L1 Canada
902.863.5822






--
Bill Huesmann
MORNING STAR (Dana 139)
Gulf Shores, AL


Antonio Martinez
 

When I removed the mast step, I fully expected to find damage.  I through drilled where the screws had been located, intending to reinstall with 1/4" machine bolts instead.  The sawdust came out 'clean' and probing with a dental tool showed solid wood as far as I can tell.  It 'taps' solid as well.  But the concavity was at least 1/8-3/16" as measured by placing a straight-edge across the pulpit.

s/v Miracle
#165 1980


On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 11:01 PM Morris London <morris_london@...> wrote:
Very interesting indeed.  Maybe it is the compressive forces.  What year is your boat Matt?


From: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io> on behalf of Matt Corwin via groups.io <bongogram=aol.com@groups.io>
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 5:21 PM
To: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Flicka20] #intro
 
no depression in mine



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Antonio Martinez <middleriverstudio@...>
Date: 5/3/20 2:49 PM (GMT-05:00)
Subject: Re: [Flicka20] #intro

Your comment about the depression in the tabernacle is VERY interesting and if true (it was the mold), encouraging as I assumed it was 40 years of compressive forces on ours.  That concavity and the failing sealant on 4 mast step screws, was causing an occasional water intrusion issue.  I just recently  sanded the gelcoat off in that area, and added cloth/resin to get it level.

a

s/v Miracle


On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 1:58 PM Morris London <morris_london@...> wrote:
I was down at the boat this morning, and fortunately read the email before going.  I took some measurements on my boat, #242 a 1983 model.  The following conditions apply, so your mileage may vary:

  1.  I have added a hinge under the mast tabernacle, and this raised the entire rig.  The hinge itself is about 1 1/8 inch in height.  However, there is a depression in the deck in the area of the tabernacle, and the hinge spans over this depression, so the effect is probably closer to 1 1/4 or 1 3/8 inch.  I have noted this same depression in photos of other boats, so I think it's in the mold, not just my boat.  If you don't have a hinge, your measurements should be less by 1 1/4 to 1 3/8 inch.
  2. My mast is raked at the 1 3/4 degrees (~10" aft at the mast head) specified on the drawings from '82 that I got with the boat.  If your rake is different the angle will change the height a bit.  An inch additional rake at the masthead would imply about 3/8 inch less clearance at the boom end.
  3. I adjusted the boom to be perpendicular to the mast (not necessarily level to the cabin or cockpit soles).
  4. My boat's deck mold does not have the integral engine hatch.  At the time my and your boats were built what they did for inboard engine installations was cut a large hole in the sole over the engine and install another fiberglass assembly with the engine hatch in it on top of the sole.  The assembly was fastened to the sole with numerous bolts all the way around the cockpit just inboard of the drainage grooves.  If you have an inboard engine you have the additional assembly.  This will add some height to the cockpit sole and thus reduce the measurement to the boom, but I don't know by how much.  If you have the assembly you should be able to remove the engine access hatch and possibly see the cut edge of the deck mold sole.  You could then measure the difference due to the added assembly.  If you have an outboard, as I do, your deck will be the same as mine.
  5. I have Kenyan spars, and they match the drawings.  The most important measurement for comparison to measurements you take of your spars is that the CL of the boom and its gooseneck fitting on the mast are 17 inches from the bottom the mast.
  6. My boat has the teak and holly sole in the cabin. This adds an additional 1/4" to the cabin sole and applies to a second measurement I give you below.
With all that in mind,  I measured the height from the cockpit sole to the bottom of the boom, at the aft end of the spar extrusion (not the endcap with the sheaves in it), to be 55 3/8 inches.  This does not include the bale for the main sheet tackle.  The point is just forward of the outboard engine fuel tank locker, if you have one of those.

Because you're looking at a dodger, a useful measurement might also be further forward in the area of the hatch.  I measured from the cabin sole to the bottom of the boom just aft of the outhaul cleat (~45 inches aft of the mast), which was pretty close to the main hatch in its fully open location, to be 86 7/8 inches.  If you don't have the teak and holly sole (most do but there are plenty out there without) your measurement would be 1/4" greater (after correcting for the hinge!).  Speaking of outhaul cleat, don't forget it protrudes below the boom another 1 inch, and depending on your dodger design may be over the dodger when the boom is in over the boat.

That's a whole lot of verbiage to deliver a couple measurements (only one that you actually asked for), and the precision of the measurements is ridiculously tight.  But, fitting a dodger or bimini to such a small boat can get down to measurements of less than an inch.

Unfortunately the sails are not on the boat right now.  If they had been I'd have taken measurements with the main raised, since that's what will determine the actual location of the boom underway.

Hope this helps.

Morris London
"Golden Crown"

From: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io> on behalf of svheron35@... <svheron35@...>
Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2020 7:35 AM
To: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io>
Subject: [Flicka20] #intro
 
I have recently bought hull #162, and will be sailing out of East Boothbay, Maine.  My first job is to replace the bowsprit which had some soft spots.  The old one is off and I am building a new one of douglas fir.  I am sure I will have lots of questions and need for advice along the way.  I will be adding and upgrading some electronics and hope, come fall, to sail her down to the Chesapeake and maybe points south.  Right now I would also like to build a dodger frame for her.  The mast may be down for another 4 to 6 weeks which makes taking measurements for its height doable but difficult.  That is why I was hoping someone might help me out by providing a measurement of the height from the cockpit sole to the bottom of the boom.  It will take me a while to build the frame and then make the dodger and would like to get started pretty soon.  Still chilly here in Maine and a good time to be doing some sewing.  Thanks for any help.
Tim S.


Antonio Martinez
 

Matt,
Can you tell us what type of connector is on the right in photo - looks like a threaded bulkhead power or VHF connector.
I have not decided how to make the connection or what type of glands to use.  Thinking I'll wait till mast is back up so I can mock up some ideas.

s/v Miracle
#165 1980


On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 5:21 PM Matt Corwin via groups.io <bongogram=aol.com@groups.io> wrote:
no depression in mine



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Antonio Martinez <middleriverstudio@...>
Date: 5/3/20 2:49 PM (GMT-05:00)
Subject: Re: [Flicka20] #intro

Your comment about the depression in the tabernacle is VERY interesting and if true (it was the mold), encouraging as I assumed it was 40 years of compressive forces on ours.  That concavity and the failing sealant on 4 mast step screws, was causing an occasional water intrusion issue.  I just recently  sanded the gelcoat off in that area, and added cloth/resin to get it level.

a

s/v Miracle


On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 1:58 PM Morris London <morris_london@...> wrote:
I was down at the boat this morning, and fortunately read the email before going.  I took some measurements on my boat, #242 a 1983 model.  The following conditions apply, so your mileage may vary:

  1.  I have added a hinge under the mast tabernacle, and this raised the entire rig.  The hinge itself is about 1 1/8 inch in height.  However, there is a depression in the deck in the area of the tabernacle, and the hinge spans over this depression, so the effect is probably closer to 1 1/4 or 1 3/8 inch.  I have noted this same depression in photos of other boats, so I think it's in the mold, not just my boat.  If you don't have a hinge, your measurements should be less by 1 1/4 to 1 3/8 inch.
  2. My mast is raked at the 1 3/4 degrees (~10" aft at the mast head) specified on the drawings from '82 that I got with the boat.  If your rake is different the angle will change the height a bit.  An inch additional rake at the masthead would imply about 3/8 inch less clearance at the boom end.
  3. I adjusted the boom to be perpendicular to the mast (not necessarily level to the cabin or cockpit soles).
  4. My boat's deck mold does not have the integral engine hatch.  At the time my and your boats were built what they did for inboard engine installations was cut a large hole in the sole over the engine and install another fiberglass assembly with the engine hatch in it on top of the sole.  The assembly was fastened to the sole with numerous bolts all the way around the cockpit just inboard of the drainage grooves.  If you have an inboard engine you have the additional assembly.  This will add some height to the cockpit sole and thus reduce the measurement to the boom, but I don't know by how much.  If you have the assembly you should be able to remove the engine access hatch and possibly see the cut edge of the deck mold sole.  You could then measure the difference due to the added assembly.  If you have an outboard, as I do, your deck will be the same as mine.
  5. I have Kenyan spars, and they match the drawings.  The most important measurement for comparison to measurements you take of your spars is that the CL of the boom and its gooseneck fitting on the mast are 17 inches from the bottom the mast.
  6. My boat has the teak and holly sole in the cabin. This adds an additional 1/4" to the cabin sole and applies to a second measurement I give you below.
With all that in mind,  I measured the height from the cockpit sole to the bottom of the boom, at the aft end of the spar extrusion (not the endcap with the sheaves in it), to be 55 3/8 inches.  This does not include the bale for the main sheet tackle.  The point is just forward of the outboard engine fuel tank locker, if you have one of those.

Because you're looking at a dodger, a useful measurement might also be further forward in the area of the hatch.  I measured from the cabin sole to the bottom of the boom just aft of the outhaul cleat (~45 inches aft of the mast), which was pretty close to the main hatch in its fully open location, to be 86 7/8 inches.  If you don't have the teak and holly sole (most do but there are plenty out there without) your measurement would be 1/4" greater (after correcting for the hinge!).  Speaking of outhaul cleat, don't forget it protrudes below the boom another 1 inch, and depending on your dodger design may be over the dodger when the boom is in over the boat.

That's a whole lot of verbiage to deliver a couple measurements (only one that you actually asked for), and the precision of the measurements is ridiculously tight.  But, fitting a dodger or bimini to such a small boat can get down to measurements of less than an inch.

Unfortunately the sails are not on the boat right now.  If they had been I'd have taken measurements with the main raised, since that's what will determine the actual location of the boom underway.

Hope this helps.

Morris London
"Golden Crown"

From: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io> on behalf of svheron35@... <svheron35@...>
Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2020 7:35 AM
To: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io>
Subject: [Flicka20] #intro
 
I have recently bought hull #162, and will be sailing out of East Boothbay, Maine.  My first job is to replace the bowsprit which had some soft spots.  The old one is off and I am building a new one of douglas fir.  I am sure I will have lots of questions and need for advice along the way.  I will be adding and upgrading some electronics and hope, come fall, to sail her down to the Chesapeake and maybe points south.  Right now I would also like to build a dodger frame for her.  The mast may be down for another 4 to 6 weeks which makes taking measurements for its height doable but difficult.  That is why I was hoping someone might help me out by providing a measurement of the height from the cockpit sole to the bottom of the boom.  It will take me a while to build the frame and then make the dodger and would like to get started pretty soon.  Still chilly here in Maine and a good time to be doing some sewing.  Thanks for any help.
Tim S.


Matt Corwin
 

Caper is 1978 formerly known as Shamrock



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Morris London <morris_london@...>
Date: 5/4/20 11:01 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Flicka20@groups.io
Subject: Re: [Flicka20] #intro

Very interesting indeed.  Maybe it is the compressive forces.  What year is your boat Matt?


From: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io> on behalf of Matt Corwin via groups.io <bongogram@...>
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 5:21 PM
To: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Flicka20] #intro
 
no depression in mine



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Antonio Martinez <middleriverstudio@...>
Date: 5/3/20 2:49 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Flicka20@groups.io
Subject: Re: [Flicka20] #intro

Your comment about the depression in the tabernacle is VERY interesting and if true (it was the mold), encouraging as I assumed it was 40 years of compressive forces on ours.  That concavity and the failing sealant on 4 mast step screws, was causing an occasional water intrusion issue.  I just recently  sanded the gelcoat off in that area, and added cloth/resin to get it level.

a

s/v Miracle


On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 1:58 PM Morris London <morris_london@...> wrote:
I was down at the boat this morning, and fortunately read the email before going.  I took some measurements on my boat, #242 a 1983 model.  The following conditions apply, so your mileage may vary:

  1.  I have added a hinge under the mast tabernacle, and this raised the entire rig.  The hinge itself is about 1 1/8 inch in height.  However, there is a depression in the deck in the area of the tabernacle, and the hinge spans over this depression, so the effect is probably closer to 1 1/4 or 1 3/8 inch.  I have noted this same depression in photos of other boats, so I think it's in the mold, not just my boat.  If you don't have a hinge, your measurements should be less by 1 1/4 to 1 3/8 inch.
  2. My mast is raked at the 1 3/4 degrees (~10" aft at the mast head) specified on the drawings from '82 that I got with the boat.  If your rake is different the angle will change the height a bit.  An inch additional rake at the masthead would imply about 3/8 inch less clearance at the boom end.
  3. I adjusted the boom to be perpendicular to the mast (not necessarily level to the cabin or cockpit soles).
  4. My boat's deck mold does not have the integral engine hatch.  At the time my and your boats were built what they did for inboard engine installations was cut a large hole in the sole over the engine and install another fiberglass assembly with the engine hatch in it on top of the sole.  The assembly was fastened to the sole with numerous bolts all the way around the cockpit just inboard of the drainage grooves.  If you have an inboard engine you have the additional assembly.  This will add some height to the cockpit sole and thus reduce the measurement to the boom, but I don't know by how much.  If you have the assembly you should be able to remove the engine access hatch and possibly see the cut edge of the deck mold sole.  You could then measure the difference due to the added assembly.  If you have an outboard, as I do, your deck will be the same as mine.
  5. I have Kenyan spars, and they match the drawings.  The most important measurement for comparison to measurements you take of your spars is that the CL of the boom and its gooseneck fitting on the mast are 17 inches from the bottom the mast.
  6. My boat has the teak and holly sole in the cabin. This adds an additional 1/4" to the cabin sole and applies to a second measurement I give you below.
With all that in mind,  I measured the height from the cockpit sole to the bottom of the boom, at the aft end of the spar extrusion (not the endcap with the sheaves in it), to be 55 3/8 inches.  This does not include the bale for the main sheet tackle.  The point is just forward of the outboard engine fuel tank locker, if you have one of those.

Because you're looking at a dodger, a useful measurement might also be further forward in the area of the hatch.  I measured from the cabin sole to the bottom of the boom just aft of the outhaul cleat (~45 inches aft of the mast), which was pretty close to the main hatch in its fully open location, to be 86 7/8 inches.  If you don't have the teak and holly sole (most do but there are plenty out there without) your measurement would be 1/4" greater (after correcting for the hinge!).  Speaking of outhaul cleat, don't forget it protrudes below the boom another 1 inch, and depending on your dodger design may be over the dodger when the boom is in over the boat.

That's a whole lot of verbiage to deliver a couple measurements (only one that you actually asked for), and the precision of the measurements is ridiculously tight.  But, fitting a dodger or bimini to such a small boat can get down to measurements of less than an inch.

Unfortunately the sails are not on the boat right now.  If they had been I'd have taken measurements with the main raised, since that's what will determine the actual location of the boom underway.

Hope this helps.

Morris London
"Golden Crown"

From: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io> on behalf of svheron35@... <svheron35@...>
Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2020 7:35 AM
To: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io>
Subject: [Flicka20] #intro
 
I have recently bought hull #162, and will be sailing out of East Boothbay, Maine.  My first job is to replace the bowsprit which had some soft spots.  The old one is off and I am building a new one of douglas fir.  I am sure I will have lots of questions and need for advice along the way.  I will be adding and upgrading some electronics and hope, come fall, to sail her down to the Chesapeake and maybe points south.  Right now I would also like to build a dodger frame for her.  The mast may be down for another 4 to 6 weeks which makes taking measurements for its height doable but difficult.  That is why I was hoping someone might help me out by providing a measurement of the height from the cockpit sole to the bottom of the boom.  It will take me a while to build the frame and then make the dodger and would like to get started pretty soon.  Still chilly here in Maine and a good time to be doing some sewing.  Thanks for any help.
Tim S.


Matt Corwin
 

I had a Contest 31 that had a very similar mast step to the Flicka's and the core was wet and rotted, I sliced the step off the cabin top using a multi tool lifting it off like a mad scientist who needs a brain...I then replaced the wood with a few blocks of marine ply smooshed into thickened epoxy and smooshed the scull cap back on. Worked fine but in the case of that boat there was no cabin top scoring, all solid glass beneath the step so pretty simple repair

Matt



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: "William Huesmann via groups.io" <Livnaboard@...>
Date: 5/4/20 11:38 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Flicka20@groups.io
Subject: Re: [Flicka20] #intro

For what it's worth, from the peanut gallery: on my Dana… 1989… Hull number 139… I had a compression (depression) at the mast step. My mast step looks nearly identical to the Flicka pictures and boats I have seen. On top of that step, I have a stainless steel plate with attachment points for blocks. Atop that, I have a hinged mast step to which the mast itself is attached with a single cross bolt. Over time… the construction of this mast step and the penetrations through it gave rise to  some depression. The reason for this was that the molded step was fiberglass, approximately 3/4 of an inch thick, followed by a piece of roughly 1/2 inch marine plywood, followed by the inside fiberglass shell from the cabin. The wood itself, over the course of 35 years, had a saturated and compressed. We drilled a 4 inch hole in the top, gouged out all the bad wood, filled it with an epoxy slurry of chopped strand fibers (kitty hair) the consistency of mayonnaise, and then allowed it four days to cure before replacing the step and hinge. I gained nearly 3/8 of an inch once we had ground the repair flush with the original step. And now, it is solid as a rock. That's just for what it's worth.  Not complicated...just time consuming.  The repair itself was quite simple.  

Bill Huesmann
S/V MORNING STAR (Dana 139)
Gulf Shores, AL

“Much as I love sailing, I'm not all that interested in going off sailing 'round the world --- tho there's those who certainly wish I would." <W. Huesmann>

On May 4, 2020, at 22:05, Morris London <morris_london@...> wrote:


So measuring with the boom parallel to the cockpit sole does make more sense.  It takes the variation due to how people rake the mast out of it.  Measuring it that way I get 61 1/2 inches.  I'm not sure why mine is less than the others, especially given the added inch or so of the hinge, but it's another data point.

MLL



From: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io> on behalf of Jim roberts via groups.io <onemauijim@...>
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 2:26 PM
To: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io>
Subject: Re: [Flicka20] #intro
 
66” on Sea Mouse, psc#5,
Cockpit sole non-opening.


On May 3, 2020, at 1:17 PM, Jim Hooker <jahooker@...> wrote:


On ours, with the boom parallel to the cockpit sole there is 64” under the boom. It may ride an inch or so higher with the sail up.

Jim Hooker
sv Niamh, #278
Detroit

On May 3, 2020, at 8:20 AM, gabriel warren <gabriel@...> wrote:

When Koremikre (#275) came to me, she had no dodger. She also had no sea hood, crucial for both dodger and solar panels. The original Pacific Seacraft is no more of course, but there is a reiteration in North Carolina. They have some of the original molds, including one for Flicka sea hoods. They whacked me $650, but it looks like it belongs there. As far as the dodger height, you can measure the height of the gooseneck and assume level. That being said, the cut of the main can vary, so the boom may be slightly up or down. My boom has an outhaul led to a cleat near the mast; I repurposed it into a topping lift, pretty important. Good luck.

Gabriel

On May 3, 2020, at 7:35 AM, svheron35@... wrote:

I have recently bought hull #162, and will be sailing out of East Boothbay, Maine.  My first job is to replace the bowsprit which had some soft spots.  The old one is off and I am building a new one of douglas fir.  I am sure I will have lots of questions and need for advice along the way.  I will be adding and upgrading some electronics and hope, come fall, to sail her down to the Chesapeake and maybe points south.  Right now I would also like to build a dodger frame for her.  The mast may be down for another 4 to 6 weeks which makes taking measurements for its height doable but difficult.  That is why I was hoping someone might help me out by providing a measurement of the height from the cockpit sole to the bottom of the boom.  It will take me a while to build the frame and then make the dodger and would like to get started pretty soon.  Still chilly here in Maine and a good time to be doing some sewing.  Thanks for any help.
Tim S.


GABRIEL WARREN-- SCULPTOR


720 King's Factory Rd
Charlestown
Rhode Island USA 02813
401.364.0087 

7984 Rt. 337
Antigonish Nova Scotia
B2G 2L1 Canada
902.863.5822






Matt Corwin
 

Yesterday I picked up my new mast electric wire, 16/3 bilge pump wire, it's super heavy duty and round in shape. Fits perfectly through the 3/8" size water tight deck fitting that looks the same as the chrome one in the picture. I have a Male to female 3 wire water tight plug that I found somewhere that will serve as the disconnect for the mast light wire and as far as the vhf goes, I will just use the standard union above deck.
Because the rig will be dropped every year I am not worried about the above deck connections, they will be cleaned and greased frequently. I did not want exposed cables in the cabin or the associated sub-panel to make the nesacary connections. 
This discussion has convinced me to re-bed the mast tabernacle plate!

Matt



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Antonio Martinez <middleriverstudio@...>
Date: 5/5/20 5:20 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: Flicka20@groups.io
Subject: Re: [Flicka20] #intro

Matt,
Can you tell us what type of connector is on the right in photo - looks like a threaded bulkhead power or VHF connector.
I have not decided how to make the connection or what type of glands to use.  Thinking I'll wait till mast is back up so I can mock up some ideas.

s/v Miracle
#165 1980


On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 5:21 PM Matt Corwin via groups.io <bongogram=aol.com@groups.io> wrote:
no depression in mine



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Antonio Martinez <middleriverstudio@...>
Date: 5/3/20 2:49 PM (GMT-05:00)
Subject: Re: [Flicka20] #intro

Your comment about the depression in the tabernacle is VERY interesting and if true (it was the mold), encouraging as I assumed it was 40 years of compressive forces on ours.  That concavity and the failing sealant on 4 mast step screws, was causing an occasional water intrusion issue.  I just recently  sanded the gelcoat off in that area, and added cloth/resin to get it level.

a

s/v Miracle


On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 1:58 PM Morris London <morris_london@...> wrote:
I was down at the boat this morning, and fortunately read the email before going.  I took some measurements on my boat, #242 a 1983 model.  The following conditions apply, so your mileage may vary:

  1.  I have added a hinge under the mast tabernacle, and this raised the entire rig.  The hinge itself is about 1 1/8 inch in height.  However, there is a depression in the deck in the area of the tabernacle, and the hinge spans over this depression, so the effect is probably closer to 1 1/4 or 1 3/8 inch.  I have noted this same depression in photos of other boats, so I think it's in the mold, not just my boat.  If you don't have a hinge, your measurements should be less by 1 1/4 to 1 3/8 inch.
  2. My mast is raked at the 1 3/4 degrees (~10" aft at the mast head) specified on the drawings from '82 that I got with the boat.  If your rake is different the angle will change the height a bit.  An inch additional rake at the masthead would imply about 3/8 inch less clearance at the boom end.
  3. I adjusted the boom to be perpendicular to the mast (not necessarily level to the cabin or cockpit soles).
  4. My boat's deck mold does not have the integral engine hatch.  At the time my and your boats were built what they did for inboard engine installations was cut a large hole in the sole over the engine and install another fiberglass assembly with the engine hatch in it on top of the sole.  The assembly was fastened to the sole with numerous bolts all the way around the cockpit just inboard of the drainage grooves.  If you have an inboard engine you have the additional assembly.  This will add some height to the cockpit sole and thus reduce the measurement to the boom, but I don't know by how much.  If you have the assembly you should be able to remove the engine access hatch and possibly see the cut edge of the deck mold sole.  You could then measure the difference due to the added assembly.  If you have an outboard, as I do, your deck will be the same as mine.
  5. I have Kenyan spars, and they match the drawings.  The most important measurement for comparison to measurements you take of your spars is that the CL of the boom and its gooseneck fitting on the mast are 17 inches from the bottom the mast.
  6. My boat has the teak and holly sole in the cabin. This adds an additional 1/4" to the cabin sole and applies to a second measurement I give you below.
With all that in mind,  I measured the height from the cockpit sole to the bottom of the boom, at the aft end of the spar extrusion (not the endcap with the sheaves in it), to be 55 3/8 inches.  This does not include the bale for the main sheet tackle.  The point is just forward of the outboard engine fuel tank locker, if you have one of those.

Because you're looking at a dodger, a useful measurement might also be further forward in the area of the hatch.  I measured from the cabin sole to the bottom of the boom just aft of the outhaul cleat (~45 inches aft of the mast), which was pretty close to the main hatch in its fully open location, to be 86 7/8 inches.  If you don't have the teak and holly sole (most do but there are plenty out there without) your measurement would be 1/4" greater (after correcting for the hinge!).  Speaking of outhaul cleat, don't forget it protrudes below the boom another 1 inch, and depending on your dodger design may be over the dodger when the boom is in over the boat.

That's a whole lot of verbiage to deliver a couple measurements (only one that you actually asked for), and the precision of the measurements is ridiculously tight.  But, fitting a dodger or bimini to such a small boat can get down to measurements of less than an inch.

Unfortunately the sails are not on the boat right now.  If they had been I'd have taken measurements with the main raised, since that's what will determine the actual location of the boom underway.

Hope this helps.

Morris London
"Golden Crown"

From: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io> on behalf of svheron35@... <svheron35@...>
Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2020 7:35 AM
To: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io>
Subject: [Flicka20] #intro
 
I have recently bought hull #162, and will be sailing out of East Boothbay, Maine.  My first job is to replace the bowsprit which had some soft spots.  The old one is off and I am building a new one of douglas fir.  I am sure I will have lots of questions and need for advice along the way.  I will be adding and upgrading some electronics and hope, come fall, to sail her down to the Chesapeake and maybe points south.  Right now I would also like to build a dodger frame for her.  The mast may be down for another 4 to 6 weeks which makes taking measurements for its height doable but difficult.  That is why I was hoping someone might help me out by providing a measurement of the height from the cockpit sole to the bottom of the boom.  It will take me a while to build the frame and then make the dodger and would like to get started pretty soon.  Still chilly here in Maine and a good time to be doing some sewing.  Thanks for any help.
Tim S.


Antonio Martinez
 

"a Male to female 3 wire water tight plug that I found somewhere"

yes, that's what I was curious about...
In the ideal world I'd love to find high quality bulkead connectors for both VHF and mast power.  Previous owner had it setup with a male-female VHF connection and a standard trailer 12v connection.  Neither is very gratifying :-/

a




On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:57 AM Matt Corwin via groups.io <bongogram=aol.com@groups.io> wrote:
Yesterday I picked up my new mast electric wire, 16/3 bilge pump wire, it's super heavy duty and round in shape. Fits perfectly through the 3/8" size water tight deck fitting that looks the same as the chrome one in the picture. I have a Male to female 3 wire water tight plug that I found somewhere that will serve as the disconnect for the mast light wire and as far as the vhf goes, I will just use the standard union above deck.
Because the rig will be dropped every year I am not worried about the above deck connections, they will be cleaned and greased frequently. I did not want exposed cables in the cabin or the associated sub-panel to make the nesacary connections. 
This discussion has convinced me to re-bed the mast tabernacle plate!

Matt



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Antonio Martinez <middleriverstudio@...>
Date: 5/5/20 5:20 AM (GMT-05:00)
Subject: Re: [Flicka20] #intro

Matt,
Can you tell us what type of connector is on the right in photo - looks like a threaded bulkhead power or VHF connector.
I have not decided how to make the connection or what type of glands to use.  Thinking I'll wait till mast is back up so I can mock up some ideas.

s/v Miracle
#165 1980


On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 5:21 PM Matt Corwin via groups.io <bongogram=aol.com@groups.io> wrote:
no depression in mine



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Antonio Martinez <middleriverstudio@...>
Date: 5/3/20 2:49 PM (GMT-05:00)
Subject: Re: [Flicka20] #intro

Your comment about the depression in the tabernacle is VERY interesting and if true (it was the mold), encouraging as I assumed it was 40 years of compressive forces on ours.  That concavity and the failing sealant on 4 mast step screws, was causing an occasional water intrusion issue.  I just recently  sanded the gelcoat off in that area, and added cloth/resin to get it level.

a

s/v Miracle


On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 1:58 PM Morris London <morris_london@...> wrote:
I was down at the boat this morning, and fortunately read the email before going.  I took some measurements on my boat, #242 a 1983 model.  The following conditions apply, so your mileage may vary:

  1.  I have added a hinge under the mast tabernacle, and this raised the entire rig.  The hinge itself is about 1 1/8 inch in height.  However, there is a depression in the deck in the area of the tabernacle, and the hinge spans over this depression, so the effect is probably closer to 1 1/4 or 1 3/8 inch.  I have noted this same depression in photos of other boats, so I think it's in the mold, not just my boat.  If you don't have a hinge, your measurements should be less by 1 1/4 to 1 3/8 inch.
  2. My mast is raked at the 1 3/4 degrees (~10" aft at the mast head) specified on the drawings from '82 that I got with the boat.  If your rake is different the angle will change the height a bit.  An inch additional rake at the masthead would imply about 3/8 inch less clearance at the boom end.
  3. I adjusted the boom to be perpendicular to the mast (not necessarily level to the cabin or cockpit soles).
  4. My boat's deck mold does not have the integral engine hatch.  At the time my and your boats were built what they did for inboard engine installations was cut a large hole in the sole over the engine and install another fiberglass assembly with the engine hatch in it on top of the sole.  The assembly was fastened to the sole with numerous bolts all the way around the cockpit just inboard of the drainage grooves.  If you have an inboard engine you have the additional assembly.  This will add some height to the cockpit sole and thus reduce the measurement to the boom, but I don't know by how much.  If you have the assembly you should be able to remove the engine access hatch and possibly see the cut edge of the deck mold sole.  You could then measure the difference due to the added assembly.  If you have an outboard, as I do, your deck will be the same as mine.
  5. I have Kenyan spars, and they match the drawings.  The most important measurement for comparison to measurements you take of your spars is that the CL of the boom and its gooseneck fitting on the mast are 17 inches from the bottom the mast.
  6. My boat has the teak and holly sole in the cabin. This adds an additional 1/4" to the cabin sole and applies to a second measurement I give you below.
With all that in mind,  I measured the height from the cockpit sole to the bottom of the boom, at the aft end of the spar extrusion (not the endcap with the sheaves in it), to be 55 3/8 inches.  This does not include the bale for the main sheet tackle.  The point is just forward of the outboard engine fuel tank locker, if you have one of those.

Because you're looking at a dodger, a useful measurement might also be further forward in the area of the hatch.  I measured from the cabin sole to the bottom of the boom just aft of the outhaul cleat (~45 inches aft of the mast), which was pretty close to the main hatch in its fully open location, to be 86 7/8 inches.  If you don't have the teak and holly sole (most do but there are plenty out there without) your measurement would be 1/4" greater (after correcting for the hinge!).  Speaking of outhaul cleat, don't forget it protrudes below the boom another 1 inch, and depending on your dodger design may be over the dodger when the boom is in over the boat.

That's a whole lot of verbiage to deliver a couple measurements (only one that you actually asked for), and the precision of the measurements is ridiculously tight.  But, fitting a dodger or bimini to such a small boat can get down to measurements of less than an inch.

Unfortunately the sails are not on the boat right now.  If they had been I'd have taken measurements with the main raised, since that's what will determine the actual location of the boom underway.

Hope this helps.

Morris London
"Golden Crown"

From: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io> on behalf of svheron35@... <svheron35@...>
Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2020 7:35 AM
To: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io>
Subject: [Flicka20] #intro
 
I have recently bought hull #162, and will be sailing out of East Boothbay, Maine.  My first job is to replace the bowsprit which had some soft spots.  The old one is off and I am building a new one of douglas fir.  I am sure I will have lots of questions and need for advice along the way.  I will be adding and upgrading some electronics and hope, come fall, to sail her down to the Chesapeake and maybe points south.  Right now I would also like to build a dodger frame for her.  The mast may be down for another 4 to 6 weeks which makes taking measurements for its height doable but difficult.  That is why I was hoping someone might help me out by providing a measurement of the height from the cockpit sole to the bottom of the boom.  It will take me a while to build the frame and then make the dodger and would like to get started pretty soon.  Still chilly here in Maine and a good time to be doing some sewing.  Thanks for any help.
Tim S.


Matt Corwin
 

The original wiring in the boat looks like heavy duty flat 5 lead trailer wire, it is #12 gauge but it is not really trailer wire, it is very easy to separate the leads without using a knife unlike trailer wire but mine also utilized a trailer wire connector outside. 



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Antonio Martinez <middleriverstudio@...>
Date: 5/5/20 1:04 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Flicka20@groups.io
Subject: Re: [Flicka20] #intro

"a Male to female 3 wire water tight plug that I found somewhere"

yes, that's what I was curious about...
In the ideal world I'd love to find high quality bulkead connectors for both VHF and mast power.  Previous owner had it setup with a male-female VHF connection and a standard trailer 12v connection.  Neither is very gratifying :-/

a




On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:57 AM Matt Corwin via groups.io <bongogram=aol.com@groups.io> wrote:
Yesterday I picked up my new mast electric wire, 16/3 bilge pump wire, it's super heavy duty and round in shape. Fits perfectly through the 3/8" size water tight deck fitting that looks the same as the chrome one in the picture. I have a Male to female 3 wire water tight plug that I found somewhere that will serve as the disconnect for the mast light wire and as far as the vhf goes, I will just use the standard union above deck.
Because the rig will be dropped every year I am not worried about the above deck connections, they will be cleaned and greased frequently. I did not want exposed cables in the cabin or the associated sub-panel to make the nesacary connections. 
This discussion has convinced me to re-bed the mast tabernacle plate!

Matt



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Antonio Martinez <middleriverstudio@...>
Date: 5/5/20 5:20 AM (GMT-05:00)
Subject: Re: [Flicka20] #intro

Matt,
Can you tell us what type of connector is on the right in photo - looks like a threaded bulkhead power or VHF connector.
I have not decided how to make the connection or what type of glands to use.  Thinking I'll wait till mast is back up so I can mock up some ideas.

s/v Miracle
#165 1980


On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 5:21 PM Matt Corwin via groups.io <bongogram=aol.com@groups.io> wrote:
no depression in mine



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Antonio Martinez <middleriverstudio@...>
Date: 5/3/20 2:49 PM (GMT-05:00)
Subject: Re: [Flicka20] #intro

Your comment about the depression in the tabernacle is VERY interesting and if true (it was the mold), encouraging as I assumed it was 40 years of compressive forces on ours.  That concavity and the failing sealant on 4 mast step screws, was causing an occasional water intrusion issue.  I just recently  sanded the gelcoat off in that area, and added cloth/resin to get it level.

a

s/v Miracle


On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 1:58 PM Morris London <morris_london@...> wrote:
I was down at the boat this morning, and fortunately read the email before going.  I took some measurements on my boat, #242 a 1983 model.  The following conditions apply, so your mileage may vary:

  1.  I have added a hinge under the mast tabernacle, and this raised the entire rig.  The hinge itself is about 1 1/8 inch in height.  However, there is a depression in the deck in the area of the tabernacle, and the hinge spans over this depression, so the effect is probably closer to 1 1/4 or 1 3/8 inch.  I have noted this same depression in photos of other boats, so I think it's in the mold, not just my boat.  If you don't have a hinge, your measurements should be less by 1 1/4 to 1 3/8 inch.
  2. My mast is raked at the 1 3/4 degrees (~10" aft at the mast head) specified on the drawings from '82 that I got with the boat.  If your rake is different the angle will change the height a bit.  An inch additional rake at the masthead would imply about 3/8 inch less clearance at the boom end.
  3. I adjusted the boom to be perpendicular to the mast (not necessarily level to the cabin or cockpit soles).
  4. My boat's deck mold does not have the integral engine hatch.  At the time my and your boats were built what they did for inboard engine installations was cut a large hole in the sole over the engine and install another fiberglass assembly with the engine hatch in it on top of the sole.  The assembly was fastened to the sole with numerous bolts all the way around the cockpit just inboard of the drainage grooves.  If you have an inboard engine you have the additional assembly.  This will add some height to the cockpit sole and thus reduce the measurement to the boom, but I don't know by how much.  If you have the assembly you should be able to remove the engine access hatch and possibly see the cut edge of the deck mold sole.  You could then measure the difference due to the added assembly.  If you have an outboard, as I do, your deck will be the same as mine.
  5. I have Kenyan spars, and they match the drawings.  The most important measurement for comparison to measurements you take of your spars is that the CL of the boom and its gooseneck fitting on the mast are 17 inches from the bottom the mast.
  6. My boat has the teak and holly sole in the cabin. This adds an additional 1/4" to the cabin sole and applies to a second measurement I give you below.
With all that in mind,  I measured the height from the cockpit sole to the bottom of the boom, at the aft end of the spar extrusion (not the endcap with the sheaves in it), to be 55 3/8 inches.  This does not include the bale for the main sheet tackle.  The point is just forward of the outboard engine fuel tank locker, if you have one of those.

Because you're looking at a dodger, a useful measurement might also be further forward in the area of the hatch.  I measured from the cabin sole to the bottom of the boom just aft of the outhaul cleat (~45 inches aft of the mast), which was pretty close to the main hatch in its fully open location, to be 86 7/8 inches.  If you don't have the teak and holly sole (most do but there are plenty out there without) your measurement would be 1/4" greater (after correcting for the hinge!).  Speaking of outhaul cleat, don't forget it protrudes below the boom another 1 inch, and depending on your dodger design may be over the dodger when the boom is in over the boat.

That's a whole lot of verbiage to deliver a couple measurements (only one that you actually asked for), and the precision of the measurements is ridiculously tight.  But, fitting a dodger or bimini to such a small boat can get down to measurements of less than an inch.

Unfortunately the sails are not on the boat right now.  If they had been I'd have taken measurements with the main raised, since that's what will determine the actual location of the boom underway.

Hope this helps.

Morris London
"Golden Crown"

From: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io> on behalf of svheron35@... <svheron35@...>
Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2020 7:35 AM
To: Flicka20@groups.io <Flicka20@groups.io>
Subject: [Flicka20] #intro
 
I have recently bought hull #162, and will be sailing out of East Boothbay, Maine.  My first job is to replace the bowsprit which had some soft spots.  The old one is off and I am building a new one of douglas fir.  I am sure I will have lots of questions and need for advice along the way.  I will be adding and upgrading some electronics and hope, come fall, to sail her down to the Chesapeake and maybe points south.  Right now I would also like to build a dodger frame for her.  The mast may be down for another 4 to 6 weeks which makes taking measurements for its height doable but difficult.  That is why I was hoping someone might help me out by providing a measurement of the height from the cockpit sole to the bottom of the boom.  It will take me a while to build the frame and then make the dodger and would like to get started pretty soon.  Still chilly here in Maine and a good time to be doing some sewing.  Thanks for any help.
Tim S.