[Elecraft_K3] Re: Rig ergonomics and performance comparison
Craig, I think I am correct in saying that the various bandpass filters available, eg ICE, Dunestar were created to reduce tx phase noise from adjacent current design radios in MO and SO2R setups. I have a pair of the Dunestar 600s here and they do just that, although antenna separation plays a big part also. We used them for several years in our GU8D operation in the IOTA Contest and they were very effective.toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
One of the things that has impressed me in the K3 discussions was the in-band close-in figures. A couple of years ago we did some in-band checks here using 2 FT1kMPs with roofing filters and tx amps. I haven't got the actual data to hand but with mono band antennas on 20m separated by 70m, we were able to operate SSB and CW to within about 100KHz. I wouldn't have thought the Dunestars would have made any difference but I honestly cannot remember.
I'm looking forward to getting my K3 shortly to do some more tests. In particular at the beginning of October we have the RSGB 21/28MHz Contest which I won last year using just the MP. This year I am intending to run SO2R with the MP and K3 and will be looking to do in-band dual mode as well as dual band. That should be interesting.
73 Chris G3SJJ
Tom Whiteside <tomw@...>
Bandpass filters depending on the type buy you from 30 to 50dB - I can't imagine a serious multi-multi contest station not using these filters regardless of the radio type... Having said that, our K2 had zero problems hearing other stations in our North American Field Day a couple of weekends ago and the other brand X radios could not say the same thing... This was 100W stations... I hope to have a K3 to add to the K2 for our effort next year.... Had we been running 1500W, even with the separation we had, I'm sure we would have had some effects on even the K2...toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I've tried using my subreceiver on my Orion I in diversity mode in 160M contests with terrible results - even using lower input Beverages for the subrx and using the transmit antennas on the much more robust main rx.... This technique works great for DXing but all the overload products on the poorer subrx graphically demonstrate the vagaries of overload products... Now with a K3....
It will be interesting, indeed!
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 5:09 PM
Subject: [Elecraft_K3] Re: Rig ergonomics and performance comparison
It will be interesting to see if the Elecraft K3 needs external
bandpass filters when used in a multi multi contest environment.
Considering what the cost is for a full set of W3NQN filters, it
certainly make the K3 a popular if you dont have this additional cost
or weight to carry around on an expedition or in contest station.
I also wonder if a Tracking Preselector will become a future option
for the K3. The Yaesu U tune preselector is a great feature although
old hat! However if the K3's front end is bullet proof it would be
hard to justify the additional expense and marginal performance gain
from a preselector. When bad IMD, Keyclicks and phase noise dominate
the value of such filters is questionable. However it might be handy
in places like Europe. Its going to be torturous operating a perfect
receiver like the K3 and hearing the good, the bad and the ugly
knowing very well its not your receiver when you hear the bad!
Such is the price of perfection!
It will be interesting to see an improved scope, particularly if it can read below the noise. I would have to say that my Pro 2 will display anything above the noise (along with the noise) and you can watch signals go in and out of the noise in real time. Having the scope always available is something that is unlikely to be duplicated any time soon by the competition at that level of performance.toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
In fact, are you sure that the ICOM spectrum scope is not from a DSP engine? I believe that they are using some fairly decent DSP to create such a good display.
The thing that I find more interesting with the add on software/hardware, is the ability to act as a VNA! Now that is pretty impressive.
I agree for a "built-in" scope, but I believe both resolution