Date
1 - 5 of 5
General coverage
Knut - AB2TC
Yup, that's answering the question perfectly. I feel famous now,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
having been quoted! Do I get a prize, like a free K3? :-) Knut - AB2TC --- In Elecraft_K3@..., "Joe Stofko" <wb1aiu@...> wrote:
|
|
Joe Stofko <wb1aiu@...>
Knut, In going over the FAQ on the Elecraft site, I found this had been added to address your question: General does not mean continuous in this case. There is a small gap at 8.215 MHz. You may be able to tune to this frequency, or not, depending on the firmware. There is a trap circuit to suppress response at this frequency, so the receiver won't work very well within several kHz of 8.215 MHz if it does allow you to tune there. 73, Joe - WB1AIU --- In Elecraft_K3@..., "ab2tc" wrote: > > With a first IF of around 8 MHz, how can the receiver be general > coverage? Will there not at least be hole in the coverage around the > IF frequency? > > 73 Knut - AB2TC > |
|
Peter Sidler - HB9PJT
Maybe it switchs the first or second IF from - to + at the critical
frequency spot. In this way it is possible to have general coverage. However for a downconverter general coverage to acchieve fair IF image rejection for all frequencies is a challange. We will see. 73, Peter - HB9PJT --- In Elecraft_K3@..., "Joe Stofko" <wb1aiu@...> wrote: the IF frequency? |
|
Joe Stofko <wb1aiu@...>
Hey Knut,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Good question. Maybe one of the gang at Elecraft will have an answer ! 73, Joe - WB1AIU --- In Elecraft_K3@..., "ab2tc" <ab2tc@...> wrote:
|
|
Knut - AB2TC
With a first IF of around 8 MHz, how can the receiver be general
coverage? Will there not at least be hole in the coverage around the IF frequency? 73 Knut - AB2TC |
|