Thanks again, Bill. Very useful information! 73, Hans Remeeus (PA1HR) http://www.remeeus.eu Communication is about people, the rest is technology. bill_w4zv schreef:

2.7 kHz. 2.1 kHz is way too narrow for SSB TX. 73, Eric <faunt@...> wrote:

Err, is the minimum 2.7kHz or 2.1kHz? 73, doug From: "Eric C. Swartz" <wa6hhq_lists@...> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 01:01:59 -0000 You must have at least one SSB b/w filter in the K3

You must have at least one SSB b/w filter in the K3 when we ship. (2.7 kHz or higher.) These filters are used on TX and must be in the rig. 73, Eric WA6HHQ

In case you have not seen it, also check the 8-pole filter plots here: http://www.elecraft.com/K3/K3_8_pole_plots.htm ...and 5-pole info

Hi Bill, Thank you so much for this very interesting information! This is very good to know before to decide and how to place the order. 73, Hans Remeeus

Correct. Correct, but you should tell Lisa you do *not* plan to operate SSB with that rig. Elecraft would not normally supply any K3 that is not capable of SSB operation in at least one filter

Hans Remeeus wrote: That sounds like a good decision - And no chance to void any warranty! I think I'm going to use the stock 2.7 filter and add a 1.8 and either a 500 or 400 in the main. Maybe a 500

Thanks Toby. When it is not fully plug-in I will not try to put the F-1000D's filters into the K3. It's better to sell the 1000D's filters and pay $90 for a filter which will fit. 73, Hans Remeeus

Hallo Hans, I was in touch with INRAD several months ago, before Elecraft announced the 1.8kHz filter, and was asking more or less the same. It seems that the filters from INRAD for 8215kHz are

A week ago I have sent a web inquiry to Elecraft but so far no answer. That's the reason why I send it to the group. I am planning to sell my FT-1000D and buy two Elecraft K3. One for SSB and one for

Hi I would like to know how it works. Does it work good ? Is there any files which demonstrates decording ? Any comments by field testers will be appreciated. aki, ja1nlx

Good Comments. If I hadn't recently retired to the status of employedpart-time and retired-the-rest, I wouldn't be able to deal with all the traffic.( That's why I do a fair amount of reply off-list

Well, I joined - I've stayed quiet on this issue. Frankly, up till now, I decided I'd stick with the 'Elecraft' list and read this Yahoo one too. Since Wayne et'al want to stay with theirs, I wasn't

And it doesn't have ads, and unlike the host of many email lists, I don't beg for money to build a bigger server. I see that a few folks have joined...I hope the posts will start...since if one

Amazing that all sorts of computer professionals use the marc system It's also amazing that the web based archives have no reply function. The web based forums, on the other hand do have not only a

Archive searching is a solved problem. It requires only hosting, which I can't offer, not having a data center, just my home DSL connection. One of the folks who is currently offering hosting could

wrote: Certainly the current implementation could be improved but, in fact, a web format does exist NOW. Maybe it's not got all the features everyone wants but it DOES EXIST since I currently read

He doesn't miss the point...and in fact, I am working on the sorting feature you describe now. I got a module in Ruby doing Bayesian sorting working this morning and am training it now on Drakelist

I'm sorry. I've resisted trying to add to this thread, but you so blatantly miss the point that I couldn't. How does any way of sorting the mailman archives show you just K1 related posts, or