My fault, gang, for not noticing that the default is reply-all.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I’m over 30, now, so my mousal reflexes aren’t as fast as they used to be. With help from my teenage son, I will learn.
On Jul 5, 2018, at 3:15 PM, Dave Sharred via Groups.Io <email@example.com> wrote:
What's up with you guys, you are all replying on list, rather than off list to a personal request !!
I didn't think Wayne wanted to go public with the figures yet, but would respond to personal requests
73 Dave G3NKC
Sent from Samsung tablet
-------- Original message --------
From: N6KR <n6kr@...>
Date: 05/07/2018 06:55 (GMT+00:00)
Subject: Re: [Elecraft-K3] Elecraft K3S / IC-7610 comparison table
The latest draft of the comparison table is attached.
On Jul 4, 2018, at 1:36 PM, Dave Cole <dave@...> wrote:
Same here, please forward!
73s and thanks,
On 07/03/2018 09:58 PM, kd0q wrote:
Pleased forward the K3S v.s. IC-7610 comparison to me.
73, Glenn - KD��Q
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 9:16 PM N6KR <n6kr@... <mailto:n6kr@...>> wrote:
In response to many questions fielded by our sales and support staff
we���ve put together a comparison of the K3S vs. the IC-7610.
While all rigs have certain strengths, the K3S has a combination of
performance, features, and form factor that provide unique benefits
to the operator, especially those who may encounter high-signal
conditions or require portability (or both, as in the case of Field
Day, DXpeditions, etc.).
The comparison table is in draft form and will continue to evolve,
so we���re not posting it on our website just yet. However, we���ll be
happy to send the current edition on request to anyone actively
weighing the tradeoffs between the K3S and other transceivers.
Please email me directly if you���re interested. I���ll be happy to
expand on information presented, whether theoretical or functional.
No doubt these discussions will help us refine the table.