FDM-DUO ALC
Tony EI8JK
Am I right in thinking that it's not possible to access the Duo's ALC?
In fact I can't find any reference to ALC in any Elad documentation. Or is it a case of carefully setting the Windows audio drive levels, which is fraught with problems as every Windows update seems to reset the audio out to whatever MS thinks fit. Thanks Tony, EI8JK
|
|
Hi Tony
you are correct on both accounts, No alc meter, and yes u would need to adjust windows drive . I asked the same question couple weeks ago, and was given a workaround for wsjtx, if u go back a few pages on forum, you will find the question from me andbthe answer from Neil regards Iain
|
|
Tony EI8JK
Thanks for that Iain.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Not really the answer I had hoped for ;-) What I wanted was an ALC connection to run/control a non-Elad linear. I thought that was a non runner though, so not unexpected. Regards & 73 Tony...
On 04/11/2019 16:50, MM6IXE wrote:
Hi Tony
|
|
Neil Smith G4DBN
Hi Tony, I think the point is that ALC should have been left to
wither on the vine back in the days of the thermionic valve, and
we should be running linear systems and controlling the levels and
gains to achieve the output level required. Sadly, somewhere
along the way, Microsoft decided they knew better, and that
wantonly changing levels was an acceptable way to behave.
(Pro-tip: it is not) ALC is definitely the spawn of Beelzebub though, and should have no place in any radio made since 1980. Neil G4DBN
On 04/11/2019 16:59, Tony EI8JK wrote:
Thanks for that Iain. -- Neil <a href="http://g4dbn.uk/"><small>g4dbn.uk</small></a>
|
|
Klaus Brosche, DK3QN <dk3qn@...>
Might be a bit 'blunt', excuse me for
that, but IMHO ALC-feedback
from an Amp into an Exciter/TRX is just about the very last thing I would consider to make an TRX/Amp combination 'work'. It's a backward feedback loop with all
kinds of implications
included! I'd rather set the DUOs RF output level
such that the Final Amplifier
is running within it's desired linear amplification range/IMD range. You do not need a high-spec SDR for checking the quality of your transmitted signal. A simple RTL-stick will do, as long as you'll keep it's RF input level (monitoring your TRX signal) within the units dynamic range. You'll then literally 'see' (waterfall)
any changes of TRX drive power
into the Amp and what this does to the quality of your transmitted RF signal. I have done this kind of 'exercise' on
the air with quite a couple of
my local club mates and they all were quite surprised in the end about what they've sent-out before and after this exercise. 'After' = a non-offensive RF signal transmitted w/o losing any signal strength at the receivers side. Klaus, DK3QN
Am 04.11.2019 um 17:59 schrieb Tony
EI8JK:
Thanks for that Iain.
|
|
Josh Murray <josh@...>
My Mentor/Elmer told me not to bother connecting the ALC line, so I never have. Always had a nice clean signal through not over-driving the amp and taking care to ask for regular feedback on my received signal quality. Josh de M0JMO
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 19:51, Klaus Brosche, DK3QN <dk3qn@...> wrote:
--
Many Thanks Best Regards Josh Murray
|
|
Your welcome Tony, maybe their is another way, lots of smart people on here Maybe someone can help u out Good luck Iain
On 4 Nov 2019, at 16:59, Tony EI8JK <ei8jk@...> wrote:
|
|
G8DQX list
Tony,
it may help to think of it this way. A Duo does not have ALC, nor does it have a slow-start heater supply, nor a thermionic valve output stage. The traditional reasons for needing ALC in a transceiver no longer apply. Nor do the reasons which required back-coupling of a so-called ALC voltage from an external amplifier to a transceiver. A digital transceiver, such as the Duo, which generates RF directly from a D/A converter at the output frequency can, in essence, run open-loop, because the gain of the PA stage(s) post D/A is relatively small, in dB terms, and relatively unvarying. Thus any needed control may be applied in the DSP, rather than the analogue, domain. A similar argument applies if the transceiver drives an external amplifier of modern, solid-state, design. So why did we ever use ALC? It was a bodge which worked using '60's technology. It allowed for both a degree of speech compression and avoidance of overdriving PAs (or external amplifiers). But note that speech compression and avoidance of overdriving are incompatible given a common mechanism. How do we know that it was a bodge? Just try finding a specification for what a given ALC voltage means, in terms of gain reduction or power output or even IMD. It's not there, merely a phono socket labelled ALC, but more accurately identified by Neil earlier! The 2018 ARRL handbook puts it more prosaically in section 14.1.2: "…Since we have absolute control over the sig-73, Robin, G8DQX On 04/11/2019 12:30, Tony EI8JK wrote: Am I right in thinking that it's not possible to access the Duo's ALC?
|
|
Paul Jones
Same as Josh here, I’ve never run ALC on any of my radios, and also had/have a clean signal, driving the Duo into the DuoArt never a problem, and then using he DuoART to drive my old Alpha78, neve a problem, running 1500w, if you put a clean signal out of the Duo you should not have any need for it, I’ve run WSJT-X here with the Duo and Duo/DuoART and not had any complaints…
Tony: What are you trying to drive
Have a Radiolutionary Day! -- Paul Jones - Elad USA Sales & Technical Support (USA) Visit http://www.eladit.com for the full range of Elad Products or USA Sales : https://shop.elad-usa.com/ Email Support Group - https://groups.io/g/EladSDR Sales Phone: 312.320.8160 Support Email: support@... Sales Email: sales@...
From: EladSDR@groups.io <EladSDR@groups.io> On Behalf Of Josh Murray
My Mentor/Elmer told me not to bother connecting the ALC line, so I never have. Always had a nice clean signal through not over-driving the amp and taking care to ask for regular feedback on my received signal quality.
Josh de M0JMO
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 19:51, Klaus Brosche, DK3QN <dk3qn@...> wrote:
-- Many Thanks
|
|
Tony EI8JK
Thanks for all the replies and advice, guys.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
All noted and I have most definitely learned something by asking the question. That's the beauty of this forum. 73, Tony.
On 04/11/2019 22:17, G8DQX list wrote:
Tony,
|
|