Date
1 - 20 of 31
Would this be useful?
|
Dave AA6YQ
An option to replace Commander's Commander's Frequency-dependent Device panels with some User-defined Sequences and Sliders:
<http://www.dxlabsuite.com/commander/CommanderUDCOption.jpg> There's not quite enough vertical room for two rows of sliders; slightly increasing the height of Commander's Main window would permit that... 73, Dave, AA6YQ |
|
|
|
Louis Sica
I (of course) vote "yes" to this option, a way for those of us without
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
frequency dependent devices to use the "screen-estate" that is currently blank. An option to replace Commander's Commander's Frequency-dependent Device |
|
|
|
Ken - K4XL
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Dave <aa6yq@...> wrote:
An option to replace Commander's Commander's Frequency-dependent DeviceIf this means giving up the Devices and Filters panel, I would vote no. I use the Amp tuning and Tuner tuning charts many times a day! I would hate to go back to sticky notes! If the panels could be made three layers deep, I would have no problem with adding the additional controls on the "third" level, but I would certainly hate to see my tuning charts go from Commander. 73, -- Ken - K4XL BoatAnchor Manual Archive BAMA - http://bama.edebris.com |
|
|
|
Bob AD5VJ
Now your talking I really like it!!!
tnx Bob AD5VJ Sent from my Samsung Epic™ 4G Dave <aa6yq@...> wrote: An option to replace Commander's Commander's Frequency-dependent Device panels with some User-defined Sequences and Sliders: <http://www.dxlabsuite.com/commander/CommanderUDCOption.jpg> There's not quite enough vertical room for two rows of sliders; slightly increasing the height of Commander's Main window would permit that... 73, Dave, AA6YQ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
|
|
Louis Sica
I think he means this has an "option", either you get room for more
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
seqs/sliders, or you get a freq dependent devices panel.... On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Dave <aa6yq@...> wrote:An option to replace Commander's Commander's Frequency-dependent DeviceIf this means giving up the Devices and Filters panel, I would vote no. I |
|
|
|
Yes, please!! The latest Commander takes up way to much vertical space
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
with the UDC panel. With the layout in the snapshot, I could fit commander below WinWarbler and still have access to the controls I need. 73, ~iain / N6ML On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Dave <aa6yq@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Bob AD5VJ
Thats what he means, a great idea Dave
tnx Bob AD5VJ Sent from my Samsung Epic™ 4G ac0x@... wrote: I think he means this has an "option", either you get room for more seqs/sliders, or you get a freq dependent devices panel.... On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Dave <aa6yq@...> wrote:An option to replace Commander's Commander's Frequency-dependent DeviceIf this means giving up the Devices and Filters panel, I would vote no. I [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
|
|
Yes, I’d use for PBT/BW, AF/RF PWR, etc.
73 ES DX, Gary -- AB9M From: Dave Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 9:16 PM To: dxlab@... Subject: [dxlab] Would this be useful? An option to replace Commander's Commander's Frequency-dependent Device panels with some User-defined Sequences and Sliders: <http://www.dxlabsuite.com/commander/CommanderUDCOption.jpg> There's not quite enough vertical room for two rows of sliders; slightly increasing the height of Commander's Main window would permit that... 73, Dave, AA6YQ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
|
|
Dave AA6YQ
-----Original Message-----AA6YQ comments below From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...]On Behalf Of Kenneth Grimm Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 10:38 PM To: dxlab@... Subject: Re: [dxlab] Would this be useful? On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Dave <aa6yq@...> wrote: An option to replace Commander's Commander's Frequency-dependent DeviceIf this means giving up the Devices and Filters panel, I would vote no. I use the Amp tuning and Tuner tuning charts many times a day! I would hate to go back to sticky notes! If the panels could be made three layers deep, I would have no problem with adding the additional controls on the "third" level, but I would certainly hate to see my tuning charts go from Commander. including frequency-dependent devices, would be retained.The proposal is for a new "option", Ken. All existing functionality, 73, Dave, AA6YQ |
|
|
|
Bob AD5VJ
Could the sliders also be buttons? On my FT-1000D mabe I'm wrong, but I dont think there is function for as many sliders as there is buttons.
tnx Bob AD5VJ Sent from my Samsung Epic™ 4G GARY HUBER <glhuber@...> wrote: Yes, I’d use for PBT/BW, AF/RF PWR, etc. 73 ES DX, Gary -- AB9M From: Dave Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 9:16 PM To: dxlab@... Subject: [dxlab] Would this be useful? An option to replace Commander's Commander's Frequency-dependent Device panels with some User-defined Sequences and Sliders: <http://www.dxlabsuite.com/commander/CommanderUDCOption.jpg> There's not quite enough vertical room for two rows of sliders; slightly increasing the height of Commander's Main window would permit that... 73, Dave, AA6YQ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
|
|
Laurie, VK3AMA <groups04@...>
My Vote,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
YES! de Laurie, VK3AMA On 18-April-2012 12:16, Dave wrote:
An option to replace Commander's Commander's Frequency-dependent Device panels with some User-defined Sequences and Sliders: |
|
|
|
Dave AA6YQ
--- In dxlab@..., Bob Ad5vj <ad5vj@...> wrote:AA6YQ comments below Could the sliders also be buttons? On my FT-1000D mabe I'm wrong, but I dont think there is function for as many sliders as there is buttons. 73,No, the allocation between buttons and sliders is fixed. You'd have two banks of 8 buttons available in the optional new arrangement. Dave, AA6YQ |
|
|
|
Ton Machielsen <ton@...>
Yes, please!! ;-)
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:16 AM, Dave <aa6yq@...> wrote: ** [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
|
|
Louis Sica
Btw not to be a nudge... But if we get more buttons/sliders, could you also increase the number of lines available in the init script (or add a feature for scripts to call subscripts) so the new buttons could all be init-ed on startup?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In dxlab@..., "Dave" <aa6yq@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Bob AD5VJ
Yep WORKS FOR ME :0)
tnx Bob AD5VJ Sent from my Samsung Epic™ 4G Dave <aa6yq@...> wrote: --- In dxlab@..., Bob Ad5vj <ad5vj@...> wrote:AA6YQ comments below Could the sliders also be buttons? On my FT-1000D mabe I'm wrong, but I dont think there is function for as many sliders as there is buttons. 73,No, the allocation between buttons and sliders is fixed. You'd have two banks of 8 buttons available in the optional new arrangement. Dave, AA6YQ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
|
|
K2GN <k2gn@...>
Great,
I like it. It could easily be made into 2 groups of buttons, 10 each, by moving the “ALT” box down to the slider line and putting another button on each line on UDCs. Larry/K2GN - <http://k2gn.com/> http://k2gn.com From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...] On Behalf Of Bob Ad5vj Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 6:14 AM To: dxlab@... Subject: Re: [dxlab] Re: Would this be useful? Yep WORKS FOR ME :0) tnx Bob AD5VJ Sent from my Samsung Epic™ 4G Dave <aa6yq@... <mailto:aa6yq%40ambersoft.com> > wrote: --- In dxlab@... <mailto:dxlab%40yahoogroups.com> , Bob Ad5vj <ad5vj@...> wrote:AA6YQ comments below Could the sliders also be buttons? On my FT-1000D mabe I'm wrong, but I dont think there is function for as many sliders as there is buttons. 73,No, the allocation between buttons and sliders is fixed. You'd have two banks of 8 buttons available in the optional new arrangement. Dave, AA6YQ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] |
|
|
|
k1ggi
What impact would this option have on the the existing udc panel?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
73, Ed, k1ggi --- In dxlab@..., "Dave" <aa6yq@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Joe Subich, W4TV
Allow me to be the curmudgeon ... since I do not use UDCs, I'd rather
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
see the other items on the development list (sound card switching for multiple radios, real-time tracking for additional awards (WAS, VUCC, etc.) attended to before wasting any development effort with items that have no bearing on the core functions of DXLab Suite. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 18-April-2012 12:16, Dave wrote:An option to replace Commander's Commander's Frequency-dependent Device panels with some User-defined Sequences and Sliders: |
|
|
|
Louis Sica
Hello Joe (curmudgeon to curmudgeon ;) )
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Good ideas both - but for Commander? I'd think the sound card switching would make more sense in WW, and the awards tracking would seem more logical in DXView or DXKeeper. And to some of us Commander's rig control functions actually are a core function of the DXLab suite (actually with a package like DXLab that does so much - what actually ARE the "core functions"? I'd expect there are quite a lot of them :) ) ----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@...> To: <dxlab@...> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 8:56 AM Subject: Re: [dxlab] Would this be useful?
|
|
|
|
Despite his extraordinary productivity, I believe that it is, in fact,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
the same Dave (not multiple clones) that develops all of the DXLab Suite applications :) I still vote for the proposed UDC feature, though. The recent addition of additional rows in the existing UDC panel has been a significant inhibitor for me - I can no longer fit Commander below WinWarbler on a 1024-pixel high desktop, as I need to be able to do with my remote setup. This means I have to keep moving Commander down so the UDCs are "off the bottom of the screen" so I can access mouse-wheel tuning without constantly re-layering the windows. Then when I want to access UDCs, I have to move the Commander to get at them. It's a "Royal Pain" :) 73, ~iain / N6ML On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:12 AM, <ac0x@...> wrote:
|
|
|