Ok. Thanks, Dave. Just wanted to make certain it wasn't something I was doing incorrectly. 73, Mike, W3QT

Thanks for the reply, Dave. I'm using v. 15.8.9 I only have this behavior under the "WAS" and "WPX" tabs. It looks like CQ no longer has band-mode endorsements (my last was in 2016), so my DXK "WPX" t

Mike, Thanks for your reply. Apparently some of CQ’s WPX award tracking has changed. A couple of years ago I received the WPX Award of Excellence and then pretty much drifted away from WPX collecting.

Question on DXK’s Real Time Award tracking. On the Awards tab in the WPX pane I have all BAND and all MODE boxes checked as well as the Real Time Progress box. The LoTW and eQSL boxes are checked, so

I agree. Seems to be a much more widespread issue since there have been similar reports from others. I'm keeping my DXK settings as they are. 73, Mike, W3QT

Mike, Thanks for the reply. Guess there’s company with this. No, don’t want the submission to count for anything. Just worked for new prefixes but figured I owed it to those who were in the contest to

Thanks, guys. Hadn’t received this before, so I was puzzled. Submission went through. 73, Mike, W3QT

I’m trying to submit just a checklog for the CQ WW CW contest this past weekend. When I ran my cabrillo log I received the following error messages concerning errors in the header. I don’t understand

Thanks for the clarification, Dave. I suspect for me "items already specified" presented a bit of a semantics issue. Your extension clarifies the reading for me. 73, Mike, W3QT

Hi Bill, Thanks for the response. It’s not a big deal. In the past I hadn’t really paid much attention to some of the information in the Capture window. I copy code in my head without many notes so it

Dave, thanks for the reply. I guess some of my confusion/questions arose from some of the information presented in DXLabwiki. Here’s where I was confused: From “Determining a Station’s Location”: “DXK

Dave, Thanks for your thoughts. If DXK via Capture Window queries QRZ (XML subscription) for information on each QSO, as it does to fill in the initial QSO information, wouldn’t DXK then automatically

Hi Dave, I worked a station today for the second time in three years. Three years ago his QTH was in IL. Today his QTH is in NC. When I entered his call into the Capture Window his old logged QTH info

Thanks, Dave. Just a handful. I try to use LoTW for most of my confirmations. About the only cards I get and submit for DXCC credit on my LoTW record are the last several needed for a new entity or 5B

I was updating my records today and noticed that some QSOs are shown as verified in my LoTW account but not so in DXK’s RAT. These were paper QSLs. My understanding is that paper QSLs do not show up i

Thanks, Dave. I guess I hadn't really paid attention to the changing date before this. Good to know that it's the date and time of the most recently created confirmation. Thanks for the explanation/cl

Thanks, Salvatore, that explains it. I knew the message about no new confirmations remains the same until a new confirmation is found, but I wasn't aware that the date also remained the same until the

I’m having a slight problem with DXK on the QSL tab in the LoTW Operations pane. The Sync LoTW QSLs date and time stamp does not change at the end of the operation. This just started. Currently the up

Thanks for the explanation, Dave. 73, Mike, W3QT

Hi Dave, I’m making some changes to my initial command sequences. I want to edit the “Name” and “Function” boxes in the command but can’t do that. I can neither delete the existing content after highl