|
K9W
Why does DXK show "Lake Wylie, SC" in the "QTH" box of log entries for K9W? Picked up from Pathfinder/QRZ.com? Easy to fix, but I'm curious... 73, Jerry K3BZ
Why does DXK show "Lake Wylie, SC" in the "QTH" box of log entries for K9W? Picked up from Pathfinder/QRZ.com? Easy to fix, but I'm curious... 73, Jerry K3BZ
|
By
K3BZ
· #127152
·
|
|
Commander Suggestion
This is an excellent idea.... I second the motion!! 73, Jerry K3BZ
This is an excellent idea.... I second the motion!! 73, Jerry K3BZ
|
By
K3BZ
· #125607
·
|
|
Unique QSO Numbers (was "Can or Can't?")
Apologies for contributing to the overhead.� My archival search and several reflector queries failed to reveal anything particularly useful about Unique QSO Numbers, and it appears that nobody reall
Apologies for contributing to the overhead.� My archival search and several reflector queries failed to reveal anything particularly useful about Unique QSO Numbers, and it appears that nobody reall
|
By
K3BZ
· #125224
·
|
|
Unique QSO Numbers (was "Can or Can't?")
That's what I'm doing, Bill, as you say...looking for "a reason to use it". I haven't had any luck finding any uses at all. I could just ignore it, but I'm a curious guy. Either Dave had something in
That's what I'm doing, Bill, as you say...looking for "a reason to use it". I haven't had any luck finding any uses at all. I could just ignore it, but I'm a curious guy. Either Dave had something in
|
By
K3BZ
· #125209
·
|
|
Unique QSO Numbers (was "Can or Can't?")
Hi, John... I agree with you that if the QSO # changes due to some action not initiated by the operator, it would "completely defeat the purpose of "unique" QSO number". But what actually is the purpo
Hi, John... I agree with you that if the QSO # changes due to some action not initiated by the operator, it would "completely defeat the purpose of "unique" QSO number". But what actually is the purpo
|
By
K3BZ
· #125192
·
|
|
Unique QSO Numbers (was "Can or Can't?")
Well, sure, Danny, and I can sympathize, believe me. I don't think the numbers will spontaneously change. Something would have to make them change. But be that as it may, just what does a unique numbe
Well, sure, Danny, and I can sympathize, believe me. I don't think the numbers will spontaneously change. Something would have to make them change. But be that as it may, just what does a unique numbe
|
By
K3BZ
· #125179
·
|
|
Unique QSO Numbers (was "Can or Can't?")
Hi, Iain... while I appreciate your effort, I don't see anything at that link that suggests what "unique QSO numbers" might be used for. I wouldn't bet against them having some good uses.... I just ca
Hi, Iain... while I appreciate your effort, I don't see anything at that link that suggests what "unique QSO numbers" might be used for. I wouldn't bet against them having some good uses.... I just ca
|
By
K3BZ
· #125174
·
|
|
Unique QSO Numbers (was "Can or Can't?")
I've been waiting for the light bulb above my head to start glowing, energized by the sudden realization of what use I could put those unique QSO numbers to... aside, of course, from whatever built-in
I've been waiting for the light bulb above my head to start glowing, energized by the sudden realization of what use I could put those unique QSO numbers to... aside, of course, from whatever built-in
|
By
K3BZ
· #125165
·
|
|
"Broken" QSOs
Thanks, Dave.... 73, Jerry K3BZ
Thanks, Dave.... 73, Jerry K3BZ
|
By
K3BZ
· #124946
·
|
|
"Broken" QSOs
Ken... since there are a number of cities that are treated similar to Lynchburg, how can I determine which counties each of them could count for? Is there a list somewhere? 73, Jerry K3BZ
Ken... since there are a number of cities that are treated similar to Lynchburg, how can I determine which counties each of them could count for? Is there a list somewhere? 73, Jerry K3BZ
|
By
K3BZ
· #124933
·
|
|
Problem with WAC report
The post by Steve NS5B cleared this up for me. Thanks, Steve 73, Jerry K3BZ
The post by Steve NS5B cleared this up for me. Thanks, Steve 73, Jerry K3BZ
|
By
K3BZ
· #124819
·
|
|
Problem with WAC report
On DXKeeper's "Check Progress" tab, when there is both a card and a LoTW confirmation indicated on the Report, is the QSO/Callsign for both? It seems easier to use LoTW confirmations rather than cards
On DXKeeper's "Check Progress" tab, when there is both a card and a LoTW confirmation indicated on the Report, is the QSO/Callsign for both? It seems easier to use LoTW confirmations rather than cards
|
By
K3BZ
· #124818
·
|
|
proposed Capture window improvement
OK... maybe someday there will be a reason to justify that effort....which, by the way, continues to be appreciated in this hamshack, every single day. 73, Jerry K3BZ
OK... maybe someday there will be a reason to justify that effort....which, by the way, continues to be appreciated in this hamshack, every single day. 73, Jerry K3BZ
|
By
K3BZ
· #124804
·
|
|
proposed Capture window improvement
OK by me... I think the State entry there is redundant. You could also remove it from the county entry box in the Awards panel.... or are they tied together? 73, Jerry K3BZ
OK by me... I think the State entry there is redundant. You could also remove it from the county entry box in the Awards panel.... or are they tied together? 73, Jerry K3BZ
|
By
K3BZ
· #124783
·
|
|
SWL report (eQSL and DXK loging), ?new feature?, your opimion ?
I like to get SWL reports/cards, but I don't log them, so I don't see a need for anything in DXKeeper besides the ! that Dave has already provided. I do expect an SASE or a green stamp if the SWL want
I like to get SWL reports/cards, but I don't log them, so I don't see a need for anything in DXKeeper besides the ! that Dave has already provided. I do expect an SASE or a green stamp if the SWL want
|
By
K3BZ
· #124485
·
|
|
LotW - TQSL 1.14.1 question
I'm down to Instruction #6 on the referenced wiki, the Station Location has been created, but DXKeeper doesn't seem able to "discover" it. Everything went well, except when I clicked "update" button,
I'm down to Instruction #6 on the referenced wiki, the Station Location has been created, but DXKeeper doesn't seem able to "discover" it. Everything went well, except when I clicked "update" button,
|
By
K3BZ
· #124385
·
|
|
Seeking feedback for proposed change
I don't see a problem as long as there's a way to know which awards or endorsements require exact mode matches. At this moment, I would have no idea. 73, Jerry K3BZ
I don't see a problem as long as there's a way to know which awards or endorsements require exact mode matches. At this moment, I would have no idea. 73, Jerry K3BZ
|
By
K3BZ
· #124356
·
|
|
Re-establishing LoTW Function in DXKeeper
I'm afraid that TQSL is gone. The four .p12 files are all I have. I thought they were the only files that needed to be backed up for LoTW. Apparently I was wrong. 73, Jerry K3BZ
I'm afraid that TQSL is gone. The four .p12 files are all I have. I thought they were the only files that needed to be backed up for LoTW. Apparently I was wrong. 73, Jerry K3BZ
|
By
K3BZ
· #124355
·
|
|
Re-establishing LoTW Function in DXKeeper
I have almost completed the recreation of my DXLab Suite installation after a catastrophic crash. One remaining problem I can't find an answer to is: how do I use the .p12 file I have managed to salva
I have almost completed the recreation of my DXLab Suite installation after a catastrophic crash. One remaining problem I can't find an answer to is: how do I use the .p12 file I have managed to salva
|
By
K3BZ
· #124344
·
|
|
Seeking feedback for proposed change
OK with me, Dave. I've had the "Subdivision validity checking"box checked probably forever. I've got WAS, but one of these days I'll get around to chasing 5BWAS. 73, Jerry K3BZ
OK with me, Dave. I've had the "Subdivision validity checking"box checked probably forever. I've got WAS, but one of these days I'll get around to chasing 5BWAS. 73, Jerry K3BZ
|
By
K3BZ
· #124285
·
|