Re: Learning Opportunity!!
Bill Duffy
Dave & Rich.......
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
No luck yet but I did use Select ( making a back up first) and examined a few suspect Back ups. No success. Fortunately the rarest DX of these is New Hampshire so I'm not too concerned. As I said, I did learn something so I'm ahead! 73 es Tnx Bill KA0VXK
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 2:09 PM To: dxlab@yahoogroups.com Subject: [dxlab] Re: Learning Opportunity!! Using Recover is appropriate when you plan to discard the current log and revert to a backup. The first thing Recover does is change the filename of your current log to include "obsolete". When mining previous backups for inadvertently deleted QSOs, the current log is being retained -- it's set aside while you hunt for the missing QSOs by opening a succession of backups, and then reloading. In the "find and restore lost QSOs" scenario, I don't see how the Recover function can do anything other than add steps and the potential for confusion. 73, Dave, AA6YQ --- In dxlab@yahoogroups.com, Rich - W3ZJ <rich@...> wrote:
------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links
|
|
Re: Learning Opportunity!!
Dave AA6YQ
Using Recover is appropriate when you plan to discard the current log and revert to a backup. The first thing Recover does is change the filename of your current log to include "obsolete".
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
When mining previous backups for inadvertently deleted QSOs, the current log is being retained -- it's set aside while you hunt for the missing QSOs by opening a succession of backups, and then reloading. In the "find and restore lost QSOs" scenario, I don't see how the Recover function can do anything other than add steps and the potential for confusion. 73, Dave, AA6YQ
--- In dxlab@yahoogroups.com, Rich - W3ZJ <rich@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Learning Opportunity!!
Richard B Drake
OK, I see what you are saying but as long as he did the backup in his step 1 so that he can revert to it he should be OK either way. The "Recover" method would likely be quicker because he wouldn't have to navigate to his backup folder which hopefully is on an alternate disk or thumb drive.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
73, Rich - W3ZJ Dave AA6YQ wrote:
-----Original Message-----AA6YQ comments below
|
|
Re: Commander and Elecraft K3
Dave AA6YQ
-----Original Message-----AA6YQ comments below From: dxlab@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dxlab@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Vic Lindgren Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 2:48 PM To: dxlab@yahoogroups.com Subject: [dxlab] Commander and Elecraft K3 Hello all, Just installed the latest Commander Rig Control Program V8.8.8 and notice their is no mention of Elecraft K3 in the drop down listing on the General tab of the Commander Configuration window. The K2 is on the list but K3 seems to have dissapeared. Any help please. DaveWhat version number appears in the title bar of Commander's Main window?
|
|
Commander and Elecraft K3
Vic Lindgren G4BYG
Hello all,
Just installed the latest Commander Rig Control Program V8.8.8 and notice their is no mention of Elecraft K3 in the drop down listing on the General tab of the Commander Configuration window. The K2 is on the list but K3 seems to have dissapeared. Any help please. HNY to you all and do enjoy reading the interesting posts. 73 de Vic G4BYG
|
|
Re: Updating Band/Mode sought fields?
Dave AA6YQ
-----Original Message-----AA6YQ comments below From: dxlab@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dxlab@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Scouse Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 5:48 AM To: dxlab@yahoogroups.com Subject: [dxlab] Updating Band/Mode sought fields? Hi All, Not sure if I've not set something wrong, or if its a bug. However, when running spotcollector,dxkeeper etc the Band Sought and Mode Sought field don't seem to update automatically when a spot is recieved. Can Dave or anyone shed any light on this? state of the band and mode checkboxes in the "DXCC Bands & Modes" panel onThe "Band Sought" and "Mode Sought" Spot Database fields reflect the the Awards tab of DXKeeper's Configuration window. For a description of each Spot Database field, see <http://www.dxlabsuite.com/spotcollector/Help/SpotDatabase.htm#Spot Database Field Table> 73, Dave, AA6YQ
|
|
Re: Learning Opportunity!!
Dave AA6YQ
-----Original Message-----AA6YQ comments below From: dxlab@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dxlab@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Rich - W3ZJ Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 1:49 PM To: dxlab@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [dxlab] Learning Opportunity!! Bill Duffy wrote: Hi Dave............Bill, Choosing "Select" in the "Log file" panel might work if the folder that contains your main log file happens to be the same as your Backup folder but if that's not the case it wont work. The correct thing to do is to Choose "Recover" in the "Backup folder" panel. Bill does not want to revert to an older log, Rich. He's attempting to locate a backup that contains losts QSOs, export those QSOs to an ADIF file, reload his current log, and import the ADIF file. Clicking the Select button gives you a standard Windows file selector window that lets you choose the log file to be opened. 73,Clicking the Open button assumes you have specified the pathname of the log file to be opened. Dave, AA6YQ
|
|
Re: Learning Opportunity!!
Richard B Drake
Bill Duffy wrote:
Hi Dave............Bill, Choosing "Select" in the "Log file" panel might work if the folder that contains your main log file happens to be the same as your Backup folder but if that's not the case it wont work. The correct thing to do is to Choose "Recover" in the "Backup folder" panel. 73, Rich - W3ZJ
|
|
Re: Learning Opportunity!!
Bill Duffy
Hi Dave............
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
# 1 Back up current Log. #2 Go to Config/Log tab #3 Choose Select(?) #4 Repeat till I find the appropriate Back Up Log Then proceed as below which I understand. Choosing 'Select' or 'Open' is my only question. I think Select is correct. Tnx es 73 Bill KA0VXK
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave AA6YQ Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 9:51 PM To: dxlab@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [dxlab] Learning Opportunity!! -----Original Message-----AA6YQ comments below From: dxlab@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dxlab@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Bill Duffy Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 7:45 PM To: dxlab@yahoogroups.com Subject: [dxlab] Learning Opportunity!! By chance, learned I was missing a QSO in my log. To verify, I looked for other known QSO’s on that date. I also did a Filter search using the date. The Q’s are gone. Now, on the DXK Config page, there as a box that one clicks to identify a Back up to revert to. Should I just go to the most recent Back up and work my way back till I find the missing? No. The Revert function means replaces the contents of the current log file with the contents of a specify backup. You might use this is you were about to perform a complex procedure, made a backup named A, performed the complex procedure, and disliked the result; at that point, reverting to A makes perfect sense. In your case, you've lost some QSOs. You hope those QSOs will exist in some backup made between today and the day those QSOs were logged. To do this, use Windows Explorer to examine the folder where you backups are kept, and determine which backups meet that criterion. Then use the "Log file" panel on the Configuration window's Log tab to load a candidate backup file, starting with the most recent first. When you find a backup that contains the missing QSOs, filter the Log Page Display so that only those QSOs are visible in the Log Page Display, and export those QSOs to an ADIF file. 73,Then use the "Log file" panel to load your current log, and import the ADIF file you just created. Dave, AA6YQ ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links
|
|
Re: Initial Cluster Command Format
Hi James,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
See the section "Automatically Updating the Spot Database and WWV History on Startup" at the bottom of http://www.dxlabsuite.com/dxlabwiki/CollectingSpots By the way, I found this with a Google search for "spotcollector initial cluster command sh/dx/100 sh/wwv/100" ;) 73, ~iain / N6ML
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 4:27 PM, James Besancon <k8sia@arrl.net> wrote:
|
|
Re: VUCC via LoTW
Peter Laws / N5UWY
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 16:43, Dave AA6YQ <aa6yq@ambersoft.com> wrote:
AA6YQ comments below LotW QSLs in VUCC & Maidenhead progress" box.At the top of the Configuration window's Awards tab, check the "IncludeIn the next version of DXKeeper, this won't be necessary. Works just fine. I even toggled the "Increase Sporadic E" button and was able to work a station in Tucson/DM42, which was a new grid for me. Thanks! -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train!
|
|
Initial Cluster Command Format
James Besancon
Greetings
Just finished rebuilding my PC after a crash and I missed saving a screen shot of my "Initial Cluster Command". I had a command that put together SH/DX/100 and SH/WWV/50 but I can't find an example of how to format it. I think I have searched the documentation but still came up empty. Any help or page I missed ? 73 - Jim - K8SIA [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
|
|
Updating Band/Mode sought fields?
Scouse <briang0vax@...>
Hi All,
Not sure if I've not set something wrong, or if its a bug. However, when running spotcollector,dxkeeper etc the Band Sought and Mode Sought field don't seem to update automatically when a spot is recieved. Can Dave or anyone shed any light on this? Best Wishes Brian G0VAX
|
|
Re: Does not select RTTY contest qso's when Add Requested used
Dave AA6YQ
Thanks for sending me your log, Allan.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
The QSOs in question are not being added to the "QSL Queue" for LotW when you click "Add Needed" because the "Station Callsign" item recorded with these QSOs does not match the callsign you specified in the "Limit Add and Sync operations to this callsign" box on the "QSL Configuration" panel's LotW tab. On the Main window's "Log QSOs" tab, select one of these QSOs with the "Auxiliary" panel open so you can see it's "Station Callsign". 73, Dave, AA6YQ
--- In dxlab@yahoogroups.com, "Dave AA6YQ" <aa6yq@...> wrote:
-----Original Message-----AA6YQ comments below
|
|
Re: Question re BROKE
Dave AA6YQ
Screenshots can't be displayed here, Dave. Please send it to me via aa6yq
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
(at) ambersoft.com 73, Dave, AA6YQ
-----Original Message-----
From: dxlab@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dxlab@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of David Shipman Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 6:27 PM To: dxlab@yahoogroups.com Subject: [dxlab] Question re BROKE Dave Thanks for the input re mass changes. Works great. However, now when I run BROKE I do not get any flashing red warnings. Rather the cursor blinks at the end of the call sign. I cannot determine what the error is. Below is a screen shot. How do I fix these, what is the error? 73 Dave David Shipman - VA7AM <mailto:davidshipman@shaw.ca> davidshipman@shaw.ca Phone: 604-926-8170 Cell: 778-861-8170 All outgoing mail scanned by AVG Anti Virus cid:_1_06BDAFDC06BDA9C80076071A882577E4 www.orcadxcc.org ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1191 / Virus Database: 1435/3377 - Release Date: 01/13/11
|
|
Question re BROKE
David Shipman <davidshipman@...>
Dave
Thanks for the input re mass changes. Works great. However, now when I run BROKE I do not get any flashing red warnings. Rather the cursor blinks at the end of the call sign. I cannot determine what the error is. Below is a screen shot. How do I fix these, what is the error? 73 Dave David Shipman - VA7AM <mailto:davidshipman@shaw.ca> davidshipman@shaw.ca Phone: 604-926-8170 Cell: 778-861-8170 All outgoing mail scanned by AVG Anti Virus cid:_1_06BDAFDC06BDA9C80076071A882577E4 www.orcadxcc.org
|
|
Re: VUCC via LoTW
Dave AA6YQ
-----Original Message-----AA6YQ comments below From: dxlab@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dxlab@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Peter Laws Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 5:20 PM To: dxlab@yahoogroups.com Subject: [dxlab] VUCC via LoTW Dave, VUCC went live on LoTW this morning. Appears to work similarly to WAS in that you have to set up an account with a rule in order to see your totals. Do we need to do anything to get this to work with DXKeeper or is it "ready to go"? I know we can display LoTW credits in the VUCC progress report, but is that it or is there more that needs to be done? LotW QSLs in VUCC & Maidenhead progress" box.At the top of the Configuration window's Awards tab, check the "Include 73,In the next version of DXKeeper, this won't be necessary. Dave, AA6YQ
|
|
Re: realtime award tracking for CQ Marathon
K3BZ
?Yep, it sure was. JoeDX is a family member here. Lee chases me down to let me know whenever Joe wants me and I'm out of earshot. She and JoeDX make an excellent combo! I'd bet that at least 20% of my current DXCC count (313 worked / 305 confirmed) were obtained through their joint efforts. I'm a really lucky guy to have them both on my team.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Lee will be pleased that you remembered. 73, Jerry K3BZ
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 1:53 PM To: dxlab@yahoogroups.com Subject: [dxlab] Re: realtime award tracking for CQ Marathon Jerry, wasn't it Lee who named Joe DX? 73, Dave, AA6YQ --- In dxlab@yahoogroups.com, "Jerry Keller \(K3BZ\)" <k3bz@...> wrote:
------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links
|
|
VUCC via LoTW
Peter Laws / N5UWY
Dave,
VUCC went live on LoTW this morning. Appears to work similarly to WAS in that you have to set up an account with a rule in order to see your totals. Do we need to do anything to get this to work with DXKeeper or is it "ready to go"? I know we can display LoTW credits in the VUCC progress report, but is that it or is there more that needs to be done? Peter -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train!
|
|
Re: Winwarbler w/o Callbook Lookup ??
Wolf, DK1FW <dk1fw@...>
Thanks Dave,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Elapsed time was actually my concern, not CPU load. I had overlooked that I can search previous qso and do a callbook lookup on demand by clicking the questionmark before the call field in WW, when "automatic lookup" is unchecked. That satisfies me needs. Advancing age shows, hi. 73 de Wolf, DK1FW Am 12.01.2011 23:25, schrieb Dave AA6YQ:
-----Original Message-----AA6YQ comments below
|
|