|
Re: Upload to Lotw : "Capture" pane versus other log entry ?
Check the QSL queue (QSL tab). If it is not empty, the right-click
"Upload" options will be disabled.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
Check the QSL queue (QSL tab). If it is not empty, the right-click
"Upload" options will be disabled.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
|
By
Joe Subich, W4TV
·
#203055
·
|
|
Upload to Lotw : "Capture" pane versus other log entry ?
You'd think I'd know this already, have been using DXK for many years. However I'm puzzled about the difference between the main log entry window versus using the "capture" window to enter a QSO. I
You'd think I'd know this already, have been using DXK for many years. However I'm puzzled about the difference between the main log entry window versus using the "capture" window to enter a QSO. I
|
By
Andrew OBrien
·
#203054
·
|
|
Re: Yaesu rotor command via FT2000 ?
+ AA6YQ comments below
Tnx for quick reply.
I understand your point of view.
Too much work for an old tansceiver.
+ Actually, the showstopper issue is this scenario:
1. Commander sends the rotator
+ AA6YQ comments below
Tnx for quick reply.
I understand your point of view.
Too much work for an old tansceiver.
+ Actually, the showstopper issue is this scenario:
1. Commander sends the rotator
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#203053
·
|
|
Re: Yaesu rotor command via FT2000 ?
Dave
Tnx for quick reply.
I understand your point of view.
Too much work for an old tansceiver.
Many thanks
Best 73
F5PHW Phil
Web page on http://f5phw.free.fr
F5PHW on FACEBOOK :
Dave
Tnx for quick reply.
I understand your point of view.
Too much work for an old tansceiver.
Many thanks
Best 73
F5PHW Phil
Web page on http://f5phw.free.fr
F5PHW on FACEBOOK :
|
By
F5PHW Phil BERGER
·
#203052
·
|
|
Re: QRZ.com lookup
Yes. I had a QSO with KD8BBK more than a year ago and the QTH & name in my log from that QSO matches what QRZ.com shows today. In other words, the previous log entry was not the source of the
Yes. I had a QSO with KD8BBK more than a year ago and the QTH & name in my log from that QSO matches what QRZ.com shows today. In other words, the previous log entry was not the source of the
|
By
Andy - K0AF
·
#203051
·
Edited
|
|
Re: Yaesu rotor command via FT2000 ?
+ AA6YQ comments below
We are working for our remote station F6KPQ.
We have FT2000 and a Yaesu rotor.
FT2000 is able to control our yaesu rotor.
You can see it here at page 48 on the instruction
+ AA6YQ comments below
We are working for our remote station F6KPQ.
We have FT2000 and a Yaesu rotor.
FT2000 is able to control our yaesu rotor.
You can see it here at page 48 on the instruction
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#203050
·
|
|
Re: QRZ.com lookup
+ AA6YQ comments below
When I enter callsign KD8BBK in the DXKeeper Capture window and select "Lookup", some of the information returned is correct but some of the info appears to be bogus. The
+ AA6YQ comments below
When I enter callsign KD8BBK in the DXKeeper Capture window and select "Lookup", some of the information returned is correct but some of the info appears to be bogus. The
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#203049
·
|
|
Re: Spotcollectors web server not answering
+ AA6YQ comments below
First of all - I know very little to web connections.
A long time ago I used the spotcollector web server and all worked fine. Now I should use it again, but I can not make it
+ AA6YQ comments below
First of all - I know very little to web connections.
A long time ago I used the spotcollector web server and all worked fine. Now I should use it again, but I can not make it
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#203048
·
|
|
QRZ.com lookup
When I enter callsign KD8BBK in the DXKeeper Capture window and select "Lookup", some of the information returned is correct but some of the info appears to be bogus. The state, county, and grid in
When I enter callsign KD8BBK in the DXKeeper Capture window and select "Lookup", some of the information returned is correct but some of the info appears to be bogus. The state, county, and grid in
|
By
Andy - K0AF
·
#203047
·
|
|
Re: Spotcollectors web server not answering
Are you able to connect from a web browser on the same machine running Spotcollector?
Are you able to connect from a web browser on the same machine running Spotcollector?
|
By
Jon Gefaell
·
#203046
·
|
|
Spotcollectors web server not answering
Hi.
First of all - I know very little to web connections.
A long time ago I used the spotcollector web server and all worked fine. Now I should use it again, but I can not make it work. I'm using the
Hi.
First of all - I know very little to web connections.
A long time ago I used the spotcollector web server and all worked fine. Now I should use it again, but I can not make it work. I'm using the
|
By
Gorm Helt-Hansen
·
#203045
·
|
|
Yaesu rotor command via FT2000 ?
Hello Dave
We are working for our remote station F6KPQ.
We have FT2000 and a Yaesu rotor.
FT2000 is able to control our yaesu rotor.
You can see it here at page 48 on the instruction
Hello Dave
We are working for our remote station F6KPQ.
We have FT2000 and a Yaesu rotor.
FT2000 is able to control our yaesu rotor.
You can see it here at page 48 on the instruction
|
By
F5PHW Phil BERGER
·
#203044
·
|
|
Re: DXKeeper 16.3.2 is available
+ AA6YQ comments below
+ A clarification regarding this enhancement to DXKeeper 16.3.2:
- when uploading a QSO to ClubLog, includes the ADIF eQSL_QSL_Rcvd field
+ Club Log ignores the ADIF
+ AA6YQ comments below
+ A clarification regarding this enhancement to DXKeeper 16.3.2:
- when uploading a QSO to ClubLog, includes the ADIF eQSL_QSL_Rcvd field
+ Club Log ignores the ADIF
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#203043
·
|
|
Re: Which mode entry to be used for KG-STV-QSO record
+ AA6YQ comments below
how do I have to log a KG-STV-QSO according the used mode, to get it to a valid LotW record!? Do I have to mark it "MSK"? Or is there an other mode to be used instead? Thanks
+ AA6YQ comments below
how do I have to log a KG-STV-QSO according the used mode, to get it to a valid LotW record!? Do I have to mark it "MSK"? Or is there an other mode to be used instead? Thanks
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#203042
·
|
|
Which mode entry to be used for KG-STV-QSO record
Hello,
how do I have to log a KG-STV-QSO according the used mode, to get it to a valid LotW record!? Do I have to mark it "MSK"? Or is there an other mode to be used instead? Thanks for your
Hello,
how do I have to log a KG-STV-QSO according the used mode, to get it to a valid LotW record!? Do I have to mark it "MSK"? Or is there an other mode to be used instead? Thanks for your
|
By
DF2PI
·
#203041
·
Edited
|
|
DXKeeper 16.3.2 is available
* If you are using Window Defender Antivirus (Windows 10), update it to its latest malware definition in
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/wdsi/definitions
before installing or upgrading to DXKeeper
* If you are using Window Defender Antivirus (Windows 10), update it to its latest malware definition in
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/wdsi/definitions
before installing or upgrading to DXKeeper
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#203040
·
|
|
Re: Secondary CAT
The virtual COM ports in Win4Icom (or any of the Win4... suites)
are for application access *not* other hardware (second transceiver
or a SDR console). They would not help you in your quest to
The virtual COM ports in Win4Icom (or any of the Win4... suites)
are for application access *not* other hardware (second transceiver
or a SDR console). They would not help you in your quest to
|
By
Joe Subich, W4TV
·
#203039
·
|
|
Re: Incorrect State Code Value in ADI File Created By DXK
I don't know what "Invalid 2-letter state code given for yourself" means; since the error message comes from QRZ, I suggest that you contact their support organization.
You might inspect your QSO
I don't know what "Invalid 2-letter state code given for yourself" means; since the error message comes from QRZ, I suggest that you contact their support organization.
You might inspect your QSO
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#203038
·
|
|
Incorrect State Code Value in ADI File Created By DXK
I created an ADI file from DXKeeper and manually uploaded it to QRZ.com
I got the following error message which I have not seen before
I created an ADI file from DXKeeper and manually uploaded it to QRZ.com
I got the following error message which I have not seen before
|
By
Mark Robinson
·
#203037
·
|
|
Re: Secondary CAT
+ AA6YQ comments below
+ I don't know what Win4Icom does with respect to supporting multiple CAT protocols simultaneously, but a "virtual COM port" does not provide CAT protocol conversion; it just
+ AA6YQ comments below
+ I don't know what Win4Icom does with respect to supporting multiple CAT protocols simultaneously, but a "virtual COM port" does not provide CAT protocol conversion; it just
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#203036
·
|