|
DX Keeper
Hopefully this is not a dumb question ? I have been using this great program for a couple of months and I love it. Especially how it sends my qso's to LOTW. But for a reason unknown to me I am now
Hopefully this is not a dumb question ? I have been using this great program for a couple of months and I love it. Especially how it sends my qso's to LOTW. But for a reason unknown to me I am now
|
By
Garry Brisbane <garry.brisbane@...>
·
#181402
·
|
|
Re: One DXKeeper Log - 2 Separate Computers...?
+ AA6YQ comments below
The "log only" mode would be useful for my "HF" and "6mtr" setup. the "6mtr" station would be in "log only" mode, so its qso's would be sent to the full logging setup in
+ AA6YQ comments below
The "log only" mode would be useful for my "HF" and "6mtr" setup. the "6mtr" station would be in "log only" mode, so its qso's would be sent to the full logging setup in
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#181401
·
|
|
Re: One DXKeeper Log - 2 Separate Computers...?
I have a similar set up as Gordon describes. I currently log the VHF contacts into the HF computer but having the flexibility would be nice. My two set ups are at 90 ° to each other and close enough
I have a similar set up as Gordon describes. I currently log the VHF contacts into the HF computer but having the flexibility would be nice. My two set ups are at 90 ° to each other and close enough
|
By
Sidney Shusterman
·
#181400
·
|
|
Re: One DXKeeper Log - 2 Separate Computers...?
Dave,
The "log only" mode would be useful for my "HF" and "6mtr" setup. the "6mtr" station would be in "log only" mode, so its qso's would be sent to the full logging setup in the "HF"
Dave,
The "log only" mode would be useful for my "HF" and "6mtr" setup. the "6mtr" station would be in "log only" mode, so its qso's would be sent to the full logging setup in the "HF"
|
By
Gordon LaPoint
·
#181399
·
|
|
Re: One DXKeeper Log - 2 Separate Computers...?
A handful plus one.
Julio, w4hy
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
A handful plus one.
Julio, w4hy
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
|
By
Julio Peralta
·
#181398
·
|
|
Re: One DXKeeper Log - 2 Separate Computers...?
FWIW ... I know what Dave would be facing should he allow multiple copies of DXKeeper to have access to the log. If I recall correctly, the log is also 'touched' by some of the other DXLab
FWIW ... I know what Dave would be facing should he allow multiple copies of DXKeeper to have access to the log. If I recall correctly, the log is also 'touched' by some of the other DXLab
|
By
neil_zampella
·
#181397
·
|
|
Re: One DXKeeper Log - 2 Separate Computers...?
+ AA6YQ comments below
There are several people I know that have 2 or more stations setup at their location. I'm one of them. I would love to be able to have DXLabs running on both stations,
+ AA6YQ comments below
There are several people I know that have 2 or more stations setup at their location. I'm one of them. I would love to be able to have DXLabs running on both stations,
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#181396
·
|
|
Spot collector port 8080/spots
my SpotCollector web (inbound access) seems fine except for a couple of items.
Mode filters: I can uncheck most of them but cannot seem to get unchecking Ascii and ThrobX to stick;
my SpotCollector web (inbound access) seems fine except for a couple of items.
Mode filters: I can uncheck most of them but cannot seem to get unchecking Ascii and ThrobX to stick;
|
By
David Reed
·
#181395
·
|
|
Re: One DXKeeper Log - 2 Separate Computers...?
Dave,
There are several people I know that have 2 or more stations setup at their location. I'm one of them. I would love to be able to have DXLabs running on both stations, multiple
Dave,
There are several people I know that have 2 or more stations setup at their location. I'm one of them. I would love to be able to have DXLabs running on both stations, multiple
|
By
Gordon LaPoint
·
#181394
·
|
|
Re: One DXKeeper Log - 2 Separate Computers...?
+ AA6YQ comments below
I had not heard of any such possibility, but that sounds like a great idea to me. In my case I have a desktop PC and could now have a lap top both using the same logging
+ AA6YQ comments below
I had not heard of any such possibility, but that sounds like a great idea to me. In my case I have a desktop PC and could now have a lap top both using the same logging
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#181393
·
|
|
Re: One DXKeeper Log - 2 Separate Computers...?
I had not heard of any such possibility, but that sounds like a great idea to me. In my case I have a desktop PC and could now have a lap top both using the same logging program. Great Idea!!
I had not heard of any such possibility, but that sounds like a great idea to me. In my case I have a desktop PC and could now have a lap top both using the same logging program. Great Idea!!
|
By
Pete N4KW
·
#181392
·
|
|
Re: Pathfinder will not connect to Google or QRZ
Gotcha
--
Thanks,
By
Lyn Wooten
·
#181391
·
|
|
Re: Pathfinder will not connect to Google or QRZ
+ AA6YQ comments below
Pathfinder is a customized instance of Internet Explorer.
Most web sites are now using HTTPS -- the secure version of HTTP. Internet Explorer on Windows XP does not support
+ AA6YQ comments below
Pathfinder is a customized instance of Internet Explorer.
Most web sites are now using HTTPS -- the secure version of HTTP. Internet Explorer on Windows XP does not support
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#181390
·
|
|
Re: Compacting spot databases
* more AA6YQ comments below
* First, spot sources change their content. What may have started as a standard telnet cluster might have at some point in time changed to a high-volume skimmer node.
*
* more AA6YQ comments below
* First, spot sources change their content. What may have started as a standard telnet cluster might have at some point in time changed to a high-volume skimmer node.
*
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#181389
·
|
|
Pathfinder will not connect to Google or QRZ
Pathfinder will not connect to Google, QRZ or DXC. Says cannot find login boxes on QRZ. Says script errors.
Other button options ie: FCC, 425DXN, WM7D, IK3QAR, etc. work fine.
Also all other
Pathfinder will not connect to Google, QRZ or DXC. Says cannot find login boxes on QRZ. Says script errors.
Other button options ie: FCC, 425DXN, WM7D, IK3QAR, etc. work fine.
Also all other
|
By
Lyn Wooten
·
#181388
·
|
|
Re: Compacting spot databases
++ W1JA comments below.
++ Thanks Dave and Laurie.
Dave wrote: "it does show that you have SpotCollector connected to 5 spot sources, one of which is dxc.w9pa.net -- a high volume CW skimmer"
++ But I
++ W1JA comments below.
++ Thanks Dave and Laurie.
Dave wrote: "it does show that you have SpotCollector connected to 5 spot sources, one of which is dxc.w9pa.net -- a high volume CW skimmer"
++ But I
|
By
John W1JA
·
#181387
·
|
|
Re: One DXKeeper Log - 2 Separate Computers...?
+ AA6YQ comments below
+ The interest level was low, so it has not been a priority.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
+ AA6YQ comments below
+ The interest level was low, so it has not been a priority.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#181386
·
|
|
Re: One DXKeeper Log - 2 Separate Computers...?
Dave,
Are you still looking into the possibility of doing this or is it already implemented?
- Guy N5YT
Dave,
Are you still looking into the possibility of doing this or is it already implemented?
- Guy N5YT
|
By
Guy N5YT
·
#181385
·
|
|
Re: Launcher crashed.
+ AA6YQ comments below
Launcher crashed.
+ What does "Launcher crashed" mean, exactly?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
+ AA6YQ comments below
Launcher crashed.
+ What does "Launcher crashed" mean, exactly?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#181384
·
|
|
Re: Launcher crashed.
That is entirely normal. 2.1.1 is the current version.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
That is entirely normal. 2.1.1 is the current version.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
|
By
Joe Subich, W4TV
·
#181383
·
|