Hi Tony, I use the Office Max 5160 labels and set the fonts to Arial 6. This allows the header line and 6 lines of contacts per label. Comes in handy when sending out cards to a station that you

man what a great group. jim and joe thank you for the updates and info. going to office depot now to get a box of lables.. 73 Tony Anthony W. DePrato WA4JQS Since Sept 9th 1962 CQ DX HALL OF FAME #

I had a casual QSO with WD4LTF. Tried to log the QSO and got a red blinking "Call" next to the call box in the capture window. Checked QRZ and the call appears to be valid. After more than a little

Tony, Avery 5160/8160 are three column (1" h x 2 5/8" w) labels. Avery 5161/8161 are two column (1" h x 4" w). I have both setting on my desk. No - both are 1" high and will handle the same number

Thanks Dave, I think it's straightened out now, but I sent you copies of the QSL reports to look at. Thanks and 73! Steve KU4BY

Thanks steve i see what they are talking about now number of lable rows per page thanks for the help 73 Tony Anthony W. DePrato WA4JQS Since Sept 9th 1962 CQ DX HALL OF FAME # 39 DXCC HONOR

Go to the Avery site http://www.avery.ca/avery/en_ca/Templates-%26-Software They have free software and full product information. Steve VE6VS

I see the LZ Contest is not supported by DXK in terms of a Cabrillo export. Is there any other contest I can pick that will output the region (oblast) and my zone? I can use that and edit the header

well with 12K+ qso's uploaded to lotw and only 2.8k confirmed i have been going thur my dxk log and found lots of direct or via qso's so i want to print labels for these. what i found in wiki states

At this point I have 2 unprocessed LotW uploads that go back 8 and 10 days with 6 later uploads processed. So they are obviously not processing uploads in order. I strongly recommend that we wait a

I would be surprised if the local file name is used for anything other than to help the file sender identify the file. If a sender sends more than pne file of the same name then it is the sender's

-----Original Message----- From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...]On Behalf Of Steve Bontempo Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2011 2:17 AM To: dxlab@... Subject: [dxlab]

Hey Guys, I noticed something odd while checking my qsl statistics and was wondering if this was a bug or if I might have something hosed up in DXKeeper. My LOTW report columns are inverted. For

The local filename that is uploaded has nothing to do with how the file is processed by the LoTW. "Signing" your upload is very similar to what happens when you exchange your credit card information

I'm shure their database isn't a flat file but I bet the initial temporary file is just a copy of your tq8 file. 73, Ricb W3ZJ Sent from my Kindle

Well, clearly they "see" the "filename" (really it's a "name" field in an HTML form that they see), because it appears in "Your Activity". I wouldn't expect that they store the logs in flat files.

I would be surprised if ARRL used your file name for their copy. Since many users could use the same name this would lead to conflicts on their end. 73, Rich W3ZJ Sent from my Kindle

+++AA6YQ comments below

I don't know how you implemented RFC-1867, but it seems like there shouldn't be any requirement for the name of the file on disk to be the same as the name you specify in the HTML form...... Just a

-----Original Message----- From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...]On Behalf Of iain macdonnell - N6ML Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 5:09 PM To: dxlab@... Subject: Re: