|
Re: "Details" Box in DXKeeper
Dave,
I reverted back to DXKeeper 16.6.6. It still shows the "Display" window whenever I work a station in WSJT-X, and it automatically sends that QSO to DXKeeper to log it. If I use the "DXKeeper
Dave,
I reverted back to DXKeeper 16.6.6. It still shows the "Display" window whenever I work a station in WSJT-X, and it automatically sends that QSO to DXKeeper to log it. If I use the "DXKeeper
|
By
Henry Boze
·
#209359
·
|
|
Re: "Details" Box in DXKeeper
Dave, in the interest of helping your troubleshooting, for me the behavior of Details becoming active by itself occurs only when I am downloading and confirming LoTW QSOs but not during routine
Dave, in the interest of helping your troubleshooting, for me the behavior of Details becoming active by itself occurs only when I am downloading and confirming LoTW QSOs but not during routine
|
By
ab4sf@...
·
#209358
·
|
|
Re: DXK - Incorrect Confirmation Status in WAZ report
Confirming that the behavior of Logbook changed here, as well as TQSL.
If a QSO is uploaded without CQ or ITU zones, and either of the zones are unambiguous, then Logbook will automatically add the
Confirming that the behavior of Logbook changed here, as well as TQSL.
If a QSO is uploaded without CQ or ITU zones, and either of the zones are unambiguous, then Logbook will automatically add the
|
By
Rick Murphy
·
#209357
·
|
|
Re: DXK - Incorrect Confirmation Status in WAZ report
Thanks Dave,
as usual your judgement was dead on. There was no Z in the cfm Box - it was blank.
So DXKeeper behaved as it should in not showing the QSO Zone as confirmed by LotW
Actually the problem
Thanks Dave,
as usual your judgement was dead on. There was no Z in the cfm Box - it was blank.
So DXKeeper behaved as it should in not showing the QSO Zone as confirmed by LotW
Actually the problem
|
By
Wolf, DK1FW
·
#209356
·
|
|
Re: Corrected DXKeeper 16.7.1 retraction instructions
Hi Dave,
I did revert back by deleting the exe, then renaming the 1666 version, but also deleted the 1667 version, simply because of the reason you gave.
Magic support, as always!
73 de Phil
Hi Dave,
I did revert back by deleting the exe, then renaming the 1666 version, but also deleted the 1667 version, simply because of the reason you gave.
Magic support, as always!
73 de Phil
|
By
Phil Cooper
·
#209355
·
|
|
Re: 6 meter WAS
Thanks Dave I will send you my files and some screenshots. I found if I tick both worked and confirmed instead of just worked on WAS DXkeeper Realtime award tracking I get the states I was expecting.
Thanks Dave I will send you my files and some screenshots. I found if I tick both worked and confirmed instead of just worked on WAS DXkeeper Realtime award tracking I get the states I was expecting.
|
By
Wayne Newport
·
#209354
·
|
|
Re: 6 meter WAS
hi Dave I only use the one qth. Checked the my QTH Tab on the main page and there is nothing written or ticked there.
+ OK. Please place your log file (suffix: .mdb) in a zip archive, attach the zip
hi Dave I only use the one qth. Checked the my QTH Tab on the main page and there is nothing written or ticked there.
+ OK. Please place your log file (suffix: .mdb) in a zip archive, attach the zip
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#209353
·
|
|
Re: 6 meter WAS
+ AA6YQ comments below
hi Dave when I have the Worked box ticked I am only getting the two countries that are not confirmed instead of the 94 countries worked.
+ That is correct. "Worked" means
+ AA6YQ comments below
hi Dave when I have the Worked box ticked I am only getting the two countries that are not confirmed instead of the 94 countries worked.
+ That is correct. "Worked" means
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#209352
·
|
|
Re: 6 meter WAS
hi Dave I only use the one qth. Checked the my QTH Tab on the main page and there is nothing written or ticked there.
hi Dave I only use the one qth. Checked the my QTH Tab on the main page and there is nothing written or ticked there.
|
By
Wayne Newport
·
#209351
·
|
|
Re: 6 meter WAS
hi Dave when I have the Worked box ticked I am only getting the two countries that are not confirmed instead of the 94 countries worked. Everything was working normally as far as DXCC is concerned
hi Dave when I have the Worked box ticked I am only getting the two countries that are not confirmed instead of the 94 countries worked. Everything was working normally as far as DXCC is concerned
|
By
Wayne Newport
·
#209350
·
|
|
Re: 6 meter WAS
+ AA6YQ comments below
A quick update. I obviously have stuffed something up. After I made the above changes. When I go to Realtime award tracking.
DXCC Band 6M mode mixed worked ticked and Include
+ AA6YQ comments below
A quick update. I obviously have stuffed something up. After I made the above changes. When I go to Realtime award tracking.
DXCC Band 6M mode mixed worked ticked and Include
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#209349
·
|
|
Re: 6 meter WAS
+ AA6YQ comments below
hi all. I just decided to activate WAS Award Progress on DXkeeper. But I am only seeing 11 states wwhen I generate a report on WAS award Tracking. I have actually worked many
+ AA6YQ comments below
hi all. I just decided to activate WAS Award Progress on DXkeeper. But I am only seeing 11 states wwhen I generate a report on WAS award Tracking. I have actually worked many
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#209348
·
|
|
Re: 6 meter WAS
A quick update. I obviously have stuffed something up. After I made the above changes. When I go to Realtime award tracking.
DXCC Band 6M mode mixed worked ticked and Include deleted DXCC entities
A quick update. I obviously have stuffed something up. After I made the above changes. When I go to Realtime award tracking.
DXCC Band 6M mode mixed worked ticked and Include deleted DXCC entities
|
By
Wayne Newport
·
#209347
·
|
|
6 meter WAS
hi all. I just decided to activate WAS Award Progress on DXkeeper. But I am only seeing 11 states wwhen I generate a report on WAS award Tracking. I have actually worked many more than that. This is
hi all. I just decided to activate WAS Award Progress on DXkeeper. But I am only seeing 11 states wwhen I generate a report on WAS award Tracking. I have actually worked many more than that. This is
|
By
Wayne Newport
·
#209346
·
|
|
Re: Corrected DXKeeper 16.7.1 retraction instructions
I reverted back to 1666 without a problem, thanks for notice and directions.
Glenn KE4KY
I reverted back to 1666 without a problem, thanks for notice and directions.
Glenn KE4KY
|
By
GLENN P. KE4KY
·
#209345
·
|
|
Re: Corrected DXKeeper 16.7.1 retraction instructions
+ AA6YQ comments below
And possibly delete DXKeeper1667.exe as well?
+ You should revert to DXKeeper 16.6.6, Phil. Deleting the file isn't necessary, but would be good hygiene.
73,
+ AA6YQ comments below
And possibly delete DXKeeper1667.exe as well?
+ You should revert to DXKeeper 16.6.6, Phil. Deleting the file isn't necessary, but would be good hygiene.
73,
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#209344
·
|
|
Re: DXK - Incorrect Confirmation Status in WAZ report
+ AA6YQ comments below
I generated a WAZ progress report today.
Strangely the 12m WAZ CW report told me that I had Zone 23 worked
(JT5DX) but not confirmed,
That QSO is shown in my log as confirmed
+ AA6YQ comments below
I generated a WAZ progress report today.
Strangely the 12m WAZ CW report told me that I had Zone 23 worked
(JT5DX) but not confirmed,
That QSO is shown in my log as confirmed
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#209343
·
|
|
Re: PROBLEM WITH LOADING TO LOTW
Dave,
Followed your instructions and have successfully eliminated dupes. All is well in my DXLabs world. Thank you for all you do and so quickly.
73,
Guy K4CNF
Dave,
Followed your instructions and have successfully eliminated dupes. All is well in my DXLabs world. Thank you for all you do and so quickly.
73,
Guy K4CNF
|
By
Guy Carlsen
·
#209342
·
|
|
DXK - Incorrect Confirmation Status in WAZ report
Dave,
I generated a WAZ progress report today.
Strangely the 12m WAZ CW report told me that I had Zone 23 worked (JT5DX) but not confirmed,
That QSO is shown in my log as confirmed and DXCC-verified
Dave,
I generated a WAZ progress report today.
Strangely the 12m WAZ CW report told me that I had Zone 23 worked (JT5DX) but not confirmed,
That QSO is shown in my log as confirmed and DXCC-verified
|
By
Wolf, DK1FW
·
#209341
·
|
|
Re: "Details" Box in DXKeeper
+ AA6YQ comments below
+ That's the result of defect in DXKeeper 16.7.1. Please revert to DXKeeper 16.6.6, using the procedure described here:
https://groups.io/g/DXLab/message/209334
73,
+ AA6YQ comments below
+ That's the result of defect in DXKeeper 16.7.1. Please revert to DXKeeper 16.6.6, using the procedure described here:
https://groups.io/g/DXLab/message/209334
73,
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#209340
·
|