I operate my home station under a different callsign assigned by the FCC during some contests. Should I create another log for my alternate callsign so I can separate those QSO's from my usual

Thank you Dave.....enjoy the snow! Spent Christmas in Wellesley with my daughter and g-kids....was pretty nice...Happy New Year. Mark WC3W

+ AA6YQ comments below + It's never a waste of time to understand what's going on. 73, Dave, AA6YQ

+ AA6YQ comments below Recently SC started "Compacting Spot Database" when we prune manualy the Spot Database. I have the "Prune hourly" box not checqued. I have set "prune entries older than" to

Turn off the "Log bearing (heading) to ANT_AZ field" setting under the "Logging" section of the JTAlert Settings window. Note: That setting has been part of JTAlert for many

Dave, you are absolutely correct! Sorry to waste your time on this; I did look at JTAlert, but missed it - and the DXKeeper upgrade was purely coincidental. 73 Parker W5ADD

Note: According to the information on the DM4X QRZ.com page the software has been changed to DX Spider. Doing a little experimentation with this cluster this afternoon, it is a "fire hose" - if you

+ AA6YQ comments below I am not logging via DXKeeper's Capture window, I am logging via WSJT-X --> JTAlert. + That means JTAlert is the source of the Azimuth being recorded with each QSO it directs

I am not logging via DXKeeper's Capture window, I am logging via WSJT-X --> JTAlert. On the Defaults tab of DXKeeper's Configuration window, the "Antenna Path" selector is set to blank. 73 Parker

This isn’t the forum for this. However, I can tell you several developers in the 90’s while I was DXCC manager said they had developed something that couldn’t be altered. I just turned it over

That is exactly what I was looking for - thank you as always Dave

It would not be that hard to print your own QSL as if it had been received in the mail. Eventually you would probably be caught, especially if you are dong many. Outlook LT Gil W0MN Hierro

+ AA6YQ comments below + Thanks. Are you logging QSOs via DXKeeper's Capture window, the "Log QSOs" tab of DXKeeper's Main window, WinWarbler, or another application? + On the Defaults tab of

They are not. In simple terms, in order to be valid (for ARRL awards), a computer generated QSL requires an original signature or separately applied "QSL Manager's stamp". Without the signature or

No, it is not enabled on the "Rotator Control" tab of DXView's Configuration window. In fact, I worked more QSOs, after quitting each of the following in turn: DXView PropView SpotCollector which

+ AA6YQ comments below if you can print it why would it not be valid for awards? + For ARRL DXCC awards, "2. Written Proof: Except in cases where the rules of Section IV apply, proof of two-way

Scott- anyone could create a fake card, if you were desperate enough. Certainly not ham spirit. I have also received several of these emailed qsls. But nothing I needed a QSL for. I don't think eqsl

Hello, I have a few QSL cards sent to me that are nothing more than printed paper QSLs. Now, they are not P5 or BV9P etc...but they are on regular paper, and have been accepted by ARRL for DXCC

I don’t know – that is why I am asking. The first thing I can think of, is that it is too easily created or faked.

if you can print it why would it not be valid for awards? Dan KC2STA -- Dan Ziolkowski KC2STA SKCC #4290T Ubuntu LINUX