|
Re: IRC spot source: "Nickname is already in use."
<ar@...> wrote:
P.S. I forgot to address your question about registration. I was able
to create an account at:
http://cservice.worldirc.org/live/
and I could use it to login to 'X',
<ar@...> wrote:
P.S. I forgot to address your question about registration. I was able
to create an account at:
http://cservice.worldirc.org/live/
and I could use it to login to 'X',
|
By
iain macdonnell - N6ML
·
#198081
·
|
|
Re: IRC spot source: "Nickname is already in use."
Hi John,
Do you have multiple instances of SpotCollector attempting to use
WorldIRC at the same time? If you do, you will need to use a different
username (nickname) on each - e.g. W1JA-1, W1JA-2,
Hi John,
Do you have multiple instances of SpotCollector attempting to use
WorldIRC at the same time? If you do, you will need to use a different
username (nickname) on each - e.g. W1JA-1, W1JA-2,
|
By
iain macdonnell - N6ML
·
#198080
·
|
|
Re: IRC spot source: "Nickname is already in use."
Dave,
In my case, I've had this problem for several weeks. I like CQDX (using it adds DX Summit as a spot source) and I miss it now that it's gone. I'm not quite ready to give up yet...
Iain,
Do you
Dave,
In my case, I've had this problem for several weeks. I like CQDX (using it adds DX Summit as a spot source) and I miss it now that it's gone. I'm not quite ready to give up yet...
Iain,
Do you
|
By
John W1JA
·
#198079
·
|
|
Re: LotW vs. DXKeeper
The correct way Joe but can be a lot of work. 😊
Outlook Laptop Gil W0MN
Hierro candente, batir de repente
44.08226N 92.51265W EN34rb
The correct way Joe but can be a lot of work. 😊
Outlook Laptop Gil W0MN
Hierro candente, batir de repente
44.08226N 92.51265W EN34rb
|
By
Gilbert Baron W0MN
·
#198078
·
|
|
Re: Incorrect format in frequency display
Hi Scott,
CI-V IC-731 mode is archaic and was only needed when the old IC-731 was used on the same CI-V bus as a more modern Icom. The IC-31 used a different frequency format in CAT commands with a
Hi Scott,
CI-V IC-731 mode is archaic and was only needed when the old IC-731 was used on the same CI-V bus as a more modern Icom. The IC-31 used a different frequency format in CAT commands with a
|
By
g4wjs
·
#198077
·
|
|
Re: Incorrect format in frequency display
Hi Dave,
This is an Icom IC-775DSP.
I was just getting WinWabbler setup for the first time, so if I recall, most of my change were there. I could not get Commander or WinWabbler to transmit, so I
Hi Dave,
This is an Icom IC-775DSP.
I was just getting WinWabbler setup for the first time, so if I recall, most of my change were there. I could not get Commander or WinWabbler to transmit, so I
|
By
Scott Anderson
·
#198076
·
|
|
Re: No sound from Spotcollector
+ AA6YQ comments below
I got back the sound, by just enabling the sound alarm setting! Of course I should have checked this before writing a post here. But I don't understand why the sound was
+ AA6YQ comments below
I got back the sound, by just enabling the sound alarm setting! Of course I should have checked this before writing a post here. But I don't understand why the sound was
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#198075
·
|
|
Re: No sound from Spotcollector
I got back the sound, by just enabling the sound alarm setting! Of course I should have checked this before writing a post here. But I don't understand why the sound was disabled. I have not touched
I got back the sound, by just enabling the sound alarm setting! Of course I should have checked this before writing a post here. But I don't understand why the sound was disabled. I have not touched
|
By
Markku SM5FLM
·
#198074
·
|
|
Re: No sound from Spotcollector
+ AA6YQ comments below
Alarmsound from SC has disappeared.
I have Windows 10 with latest update Version 20H2 installed 1 November.
I have an Icom IC-7300 with builtin sound driver USB.
Sounds from
+ AA6YQ comments below
Alarmsound from SC has disappeared.
I have Windows 10 with latest update Version 20H2 installed 1 November.
I have an Icom IC-7300 with builtin sound driver USB.
Sounds from
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#198073
·
|
|
Re: Incorrect format in frequency display
+ AA6YQ comments below
I'm not sure what I did, but now Commander, DXKeeper, and WinWabbler all show a funky format for the frequency.
So now:
3.925.00
Becomes:
392,500.00
It was working fine, then
+ AA6YQ comments below
I'm not sure what I did, but now Commander, DXKeeper, and WinWabbler all show a funky format for the frequency.
So now:
3.925.00
Becomes:
392,500.00
It was working fine, then
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#198072
·
|
|
Re: IRC spot source: "Nickname is already in use."
I don't know anything about the WorldIRC service, but from a quick
look around, it gives me the impression of something that's dying a
slow death. Their services seem to be somewhat broken - at least
I don't know anything about the WorldIRC service, but from a quick
look around, it gives me the impression of something that's dying a
slow death. Their services seem to be somewhat broken - at least
|
By
iain macdonnell - N6ML
·
#198071
·
|
|
Incorrect format in frequency display
Hi All,
I'm not sure what I did, but now Commander, DXKeeper, and WinWabbler all show a funky format for the frequency.
So now:
3.925.00
Becomes:
392,500.00
It was working fine, then I was playing
Hi All,
I'm not sure what I did, but now Commander, DXKeeper, and WinWabbler all show a funky format for the frequency.
So now:
3.925.00
Becomes:
392,500.00
It was working fine, then I was playing
|
By
Scott Anderson
·
#198070
·
|
|
Re: How to fix bad MYQTHID and re-upload to LOTW?
+ AA6YQ comments below
I have two locations defined in TQSL: My home QTH and one in another state where I sometimes operate portable for Field Day. Historically in my DXKeeper log these locations
+ AA6YQ comments below
I have two locations defined in TQSL: My home QTH and one in another state where I sometimes operate portable for Field Day. Historically in my DXKeeper log these locations
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#198069
·
|
|
Re: LotW vs. DXKeeper
I *DO NOT* allow the LotW data to overwrite my log data. I have seen
far too many instances of W1/W2/W3/W8/W9/W0 callsigns that have been
in my log for 20+ years and confirmed suddenly appearing as
I *DO NOT* allow the LotW data to overwrite my log data. I have seen
far too many instances of W1/W2/W3/W8/W9/W0 callsigns that have been
in my log for 20+ years and confirmed suddenly appearing as
|
By
Joe Subich, W4TV
·
#198068
·
|
|
Re: LotW vs. DXKeeper
OR NOT !!!
Outlook Laptop Gil W0MN
Hierro candente, batir de repente
44.08226N 92.51265W EN34rb
OR NOT !!!
Outlook Laptop Gil W0MN
Hierro candente, batir de repente
44.08226N 92.51265W EN34rb
|
By
Gilbert Baron W0MN
·
#198067
·
|
|
Re: LotW vs. DXKeeper
+ AA6YQ comments below
+ Historically, there have been complaints about the accuracy of information submitted by QSO partners, incorrect grid squares, and swapped CQ and ITU zones being the most
+ AA6YQ comments below
+ Historically, there have been complaints about the accuracy of information submitted by QSO partners, incorrect grid squares, and swapped CQ and ITU zones being the most
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#198066
·
|
|
Re: LotW vs. DXKeeper
Dave -
I also permit LoTW to override my log, for the reasons cited by Neil in his response.
Dave - K9FN
Dave -
I also permit LoTW to override my log, for the reasons cited by Neil in his response.
Dave - K9FN
|
By
David Bunte
·
#198065
·
|
|
Re: LotW vs. DXKeeper
FWIW ... I let it overwrite as that's what my QSO partner has set for
his station location in LoTW which may be better data than what I have
logged for the station previously, or that QRZ has.
Neil,
FWIW ... I let it overwrite as that's what my QSO partner has set for
his station location in LoTW which may be better data than what I have
logged for the station previously, or that QRZ has.
Neil,
|
By
neil_zampella
·
#198064
·
|
|
Re: DXKeeper Capture Window (Rod's procedure)
Thanks for the errorlog, Rod.
DXKeeper is behaving as designed: a callbook lookup will not over-write name and QTH information already present in the Capture window - information that you may have
Thanks for the errorlog, Rod.
DXKeeper is behaving as designed: a callbook lookup will not over-write name and QTH information already present in the Capture window - information that you may have
|
By
Dave AA6YQ
·
#198063
·
|
|
LotW vs. DXKeeper
I note that when I do an update from LotW, I get a lot of mismatched Grids, and other stuff like county; my tendency is to not let the update overwrite with LotW data; as the operation may have been
I note that when I do an update from LotW, I get a lot of mismatched Grids, and other stuff like county; my tendency is to not let the update overwrite with LotW data; as the operation may have been
|
By
David Reed
·
#198062
·
|