Date   
Re: assuming LoTW confirmations "count" for IOTA might not be a good idea By Dave AA6YQ · #193825 ·
Re: assuming LoTW confirmations "count" for IOTA might not be a good idea By Dave AA6YQ · #193824 ·
Re: 60mtrs in DXView? By Dave / NR1DX · #193823 ·
Re: URE QDure paper QSL System By Herman / PA3BFH · #193822 ·
Re: 60mtrs in DXView? By Joe Subich, W4TV · #193821 ·
Re: An iota of work for Dave ... By w6de · #193820 ·
60mtrs in DXView? By Brian Bowers G0VAX · #193819 ·
Re: URE QDure paper QSL System By Carl - WC4H · #193818 ·
LotW sent field is set to U but QSOs are not in LotW By Steve K8JQ · #193817 ·
URE QDure paper QSL System By Herman / PA3BFH · #193816 ·
Re: Failure to Upload Qs to LOTW By Fred - NA2U · #193815 ·
Re: assuming LoTW confirmations "count" for IOTA might not be a good idea By Carl - WC4H · #193814 ·
Re: assuming LoTW confirmations "count" for IOTA might not be a good idea By IK1ADH · #193813 ·
Re: assuming LoTW confirmations "count" for IOTA might not be a good idea By g4wjs · #193812 ·
Re: Failure to Upload Qs to LOTW By Dave AA6YQ · #193811 ·
Re: Failure to Upload Qs to LOTW By Fred - NA2U · #193810 ·
Re: assuming LoTW confirmations "count" for IOTA might not be a good idea By Dave AA6YQ · #193809 ·
Re: Failure to Upload Qs to LOTW By Dave AA6YQ · #193808 ·
Re: assuming LoTW confirmations "count" for IOTA might not be a good idea By Joe Subich, W4TV · #193807 ·
Re: An iota of work for Dave ... By Joe Subich, W4TV · #193806 ·