Date   

Re: Kids, help on submission

Dave AA6YQ
 

+ AA6YQ comments below

Given I do not know which qsl have been changed by my niece, I do not know from which date she 'submitted' from

I assume that it was qso dated after Jan 1st.

The ask is to create an sql (spell check change that to sal in previous email) to reset the indicator back to not submitted. ( I assume that is an 'N') from any qso that were logged Jan 1 2020 and afterwards

+ Do you have a log backup that you can restore?

73,

Dave, AA6YQ


Re: RTTY Practice

Pete Smith
 

Walt, the ARRL has daily bulletin service in RTTY from W1AW.  Check the ARRL web site for the schedule.  The Reverse Beacon Network also spots RTTY, but in my experience activity is pretty low outside contests

73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network 
at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now 
spotting RTTY activity worldwide. 
For spots, please use your favorite 
"retail" DX cluster.
On 10/24/2020 12:55 PM, WALTDEWS@... wrote:

Using DXLabs Suite and I would like to try my hand at some RTTY.  (Been doing PSK31 and FT8/FT4)  Old Navy radioman and cut my radio teeth on RTTY.  Is there a regular RTTY broadcast of some kind that I can go to for the purpose of practicing getting a signal "tuned in" to copy?  I have not have much luck tuning in an around 14.080 and I am not sure what the signal should look like on the waterfall.  Any help or suggestions appreciated.


Re: Kids, help on submission

Robert galambos
 

Given I do not know which qsl have been changed by my niece, I do not know from which date she 'submitted' from 

I assume that it was qso dated after Jan 1st. 

The ask is to create an sql (spell check change that to sal in previous email)  to reset the indicator back to not submitted. ( I assume that is an 'N') from any qso that were logged Jan 1 2020 and afterwards

Written English is not that great. Sorry


Re: N1MM-DXKeeper Gateway version 1.1.6

Dave AA6YQ
 

+ AA6YQ comments below
While using the gateway, if I enter a callsign in N1MM and hit enter the info is populated in N1MM but then the focus goes to the gateway application. I have to click on the N1MM log window so I can hit enter to log the qso. Is there a way to keep the gateway from taking the focus?
+ The new "Operation log" added in  Gateway1.1.6 may be responsible for that; I will investigate...

        73,

             Dave, AA6YQ


Re: N1MM-DXKeeper Gateway version 1.1.6

Kent N6WT
 

Dave

While using the gateway, if I enter a callsign in N1MM and hit enter the info is populated in N1MM but then the focus goes to the gateway application. I have to click on the N1MM log window so I can hit enter to log the qso. Is there a way to keep the gateway from taking the focus? 

Thanks
73
Kent
N6WT


On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 11:56 AM Dave AA6YQ <aa6yq@...> wrote:
+ AA6YQ comments below
Thank you for your quick response for the update to N1MM to DxKeeper Gateway. I'm trying it out now and really like the new log feature.
One issue though. I get a popup from DXkeeper "there is no log page display sort specified, sorting the log page display by QSO date". 
+ In the Sort panel in the lower-left corner of the "Log QSOs" tab on DXKeeper's Main window, select "UTC".

     73,

           Dave, AA6YQ


Re: N1MM-DXKeeper Gateway version 1.1.6

Dave AA6YQ
 

+ AA6YQ comments below
Thank you for your quick response for the update to N1MM to DxKeeper Gateway. I'm trying it out now and really like the new log feature.
One issue though. I get a popup from DXkeeper "there is no log page display sort specified, sorting the log page display by QSO date". 
+ In the Sort panel in the lower-left corner of the "Log QSOs" tab on DXKeeper's Main window, select "UTC".

     73,

           Dave, AA6YQ


Re: N1MM-DXKeeper Gateway version 1.1.6

Phil Deaver
 

Dave-
Thank you for your quick response for the update to N1MM to DxKeeper Gateway. I'm trying it out now and really like the new log feature.
One issue though. I get a popup from DXkeeper "there is no log page display sort specified, sorting the log page display by QSO date". This popup puts a halt to the contacts transferring to DXkeeper and LOTW. If I press OK, I get one more contact transferred and then the message again. It doesn't appear to lose any, it just holds them. I had to press it twenty times this morning to clear the logjam.  I've looked at the menus and don't see one to indicate a default sort to prevent the popup from appearing. I've been seeing the issue lately and I think I've seen it before this latest revision. 
Thanks again for the quick revision to N1MM to Dxkeeper Gateway.
Phil WR7T


Re: RTTY Practice

Dave AA6YQ
 

+ AA6YQ comments below
Using DXLabs Suite and I would like to try my hand at some RTTY.  (Been doing PSK31 and FT8/FT4)  Old Navy radioman and cut my radio teeth on RTTY.  Is there a regular RTTY broadcast of some kind that I can go to for the purpose of practicing getting a signal "tuned in" to copy?  I have not have much luck tuning in an around 14.080 and I am not sure what the signal should look like on the waterfall.  Any help or suggestions appreciated
+ The annotated picture of WinWarbler's Main window in

<https://www.dxlabsuite.com/dxlabwiki/RTTY_Operation>

+ shows a RTTY signal in its waterfall display.

       73,

              Dave, AA6YQ


Re: RTTY Practice

w6de
 

The ARRL sends bulletins in multiple formats—including digital (RTTY).

 

http://www.arrl.org/w1aw-operating-schedule#digital

 

73,

Dave, w6de

 

From: DXLab@groups.io [mailto:DXLab@groups.io] On Behalf Of WALTDEWS@...
Sent: Saturday, October 24, 2020 16:56
To: DXLab@groups.io
Subject: [DXLab] RTTY Practice

 

Using DXLabs Suite and I would like to try my hand at some RTTY.  (Been doing PSK31 and FT8/FT4)  Old Navy radioman and cut my radio teeth on RTTY.  Is there a regular RTTY broadcast of some kind that I can go to for the purpose of practicing getting a signal "tuned in" to copy?  I have not have much luck tuning in an around 14.080 and I am not sure what the signal should look like on the waterfall.  Any help or suggestions appreciated.


RTTY Practice

WALTDEWS@...
 

Using DXLabs Suite and I would like to try my hand at some RTTY.  (Been doing PSK31 and FT8/FT4)  Old Navy radioman and cut my radio teeth on RTTY.  Is there a regular RTTY broadcast of some kind that I can go to for the purpose of practicing getting a signal "tuned in" to copy?  I have not have much luck tuning in an around 14.080 and I am not sure what the signal should look like on the waterfall.  Any help or suggestions appreciated.


Re: Kids, help on submission

Dave AA6YQ
 

AA6YQ comments below
Ok, with no comment.....
My 7 year old niece was playing my laptop (when we were not on lockdown).. I think most of you know the end results. The end result she set WAS qsl as submitted and then cleared the panel.
+ I don't understand what "set WAS qsl as submitted" means. Please explain.

+ Which panel was cleared?
 
I tried creating an sal to set it back to N ( I believe that is the state it should be before my 'jr' in training, never to touch anything with me there, operator
+ I don't understand what does "creating an sal to set it back to N" means. Please explain.
 
Can one help me to reset all eligible qso from 1/1/2020
 
+ I don't understand what "reset all eligible qso from 1/1/2020" means. Please explain,

        73,

              Dave, AA6YQ


Kids, help on submission

Robert galambos
 

Ok, with no comment.....
My 7 year old niece was playing my laptop (when we were not on lockdown).. I think most of you know the end results. The end result she set WAS qsl as submitted and then cleared the panel.

I tried creating an sal to set it back to N ( I believe that is the state it should be before my 'jr' in training, never to touch anything with me there, operator


Can one help me to reset all eligible qso from 1/1/2020

Thanks



DEC for YORK & DURHAM Region ARES.
ASEC GTA ARES section
M: +1-416-876-2979
H:  +1-416-227-1414
E:   va3bxg@...
WL: va3bxg@...

When all else fails


Re: How to disable FTx audible alarms (only) ??

Dave AA6YQ
 

+ AA6YQ comments below
damn... i always hate it when i'm told its in the manual, as i do normally try to at least look at it... i read that section but misunderstood what the "filtered" meant in the context of the audio stuff. 

+ How would you suggest that the documentation be improved to prevent the misunderstanding?

       73,

               Dave, AA6YQ


Re: How to disable FTx audible alarms (only) ??

bob-w9zv
 

damn... i always hate it when i'm told its in the manual, as i do normally try to at least look at it... i read that section but misunderstood what the "filtered" meant in the context of the audio stuff.  arrrrrghhh

I agree what is implemented is more flexible and desired (splitting the display/announcments apart) and its the right thing to do and fairly obvious... my query may have been a bit ambiguous. 

i normally do a lot or RTFM... before i post something here.   Having created a few apps in my time, I realize how supporting the thing is no trivial effort on your part, thank you for that.   apologize for taking your "support" bandwidth Dave... 


Re: DXK: LotW Sent/Rcvd Status for FT4

Dave AA6YQ
 

The root cause of the behavior reported below: Larry was running DXKeeper 14.7.9, which was publicly released in December 2018 before DXKeeper provided support for FT4.

The fix? Upgrade to the current version of DXKeeper.

         73,

                  Dave, AA6YQ 

 

On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 11:12 AM, Larry Koziel wrote:

Some time ago I happened to notice that some QSOs that had been confirmed in LotW did not have that reflected in their status in DXK. I remember manually updated some QSOs, but I didn't really pay much attention to the details. Until now.

When I noticed this again, I began to investigate and found that this seemed to affect FT4 QSOs. When I checked LotW, I found 406 FT4 QSOs of which 304 were confirmed. DXK showed 395 QSOs but only 6 confirmed! I suspect that these 6 QSO records were ones I updated manually, but I'm not sure because I did that months ago and as I said I didn't really pay much attention back then. 

I automatically log FT8/4 contacts to DXK via JTAlert and from there upload to LotW. I've found that LotW_QSL_Sent for the contacts LotW is showing as confirmed is "U" and not "Y", and LotW_QSL_Rcvd show as "R". I've looked at my latest LotW_QSOs_ADI.txt and it shows acknowledgment of FT4 QSOs as well as for other modes but LotW_QSL_Sent shows them as "U". Likewise, I checked my latest LotW_QSLs_ADI.txt and found that only the FT4 QSLs did not have LotW_QSL_Rcvd changed from "R" to "Y".

What could be going on here? I haven't attempted to see if this happens for contacts in other modes, so is this specific to FT4? Is there a fix? And how do I go about correcting the status of hundreds of contact?


Re: Commander + CW Skimmer to Commander - strange behaviour

Wolf, DK1FW
 

Thanks Dave,

I will first try to invoke my command sequences in a different way.
If that does not solve it i will check with Dick.

73 de Wolf

Am 23.10.2020 um 20:22 schrieb Dave AA6YQ:

+ Thanks, Wolf!

+ It's clear from your description above that incorrect commands are being sent to the radio while "CW Skimmer to Commander" is running. I do not have the source code to this application. Thus I suggest that you report the above behavior to its author Dick W3OA; I will be happy to assist Dick if he needs help.


Re: Commander + CW Skimmer to Commander - strange behaviour

Dave AA6YQ
 

+ AA6YQ comments below

1. Step: only Commander, CW Skimmer to Commander and CW Skimmer are started Commander's initial command sequence sets both VFOs to CW and same frequency (AB command). No split.
After the AB command only the normal status polling/reporting occurs.
When I set the radio to Split and click into CW Skimmer -VFO-A is commanded to its previous frequency -VFO-B is commanded to the click-frequency -VFO-B is commanded to CW mode So everything works as it should

2. Step: same configuration as in 1. Step I invoke my FT8 command sequence, which puts VFO-A(RX) into USB with 4kHz bandwidth and VFO-B(TX) to PKT-U.
After that I invoke my CW command sequence, which is the same as Commander's initial command sequence.
When I then set Split and click into CW Skimmer
- message flow shows the commands as in 1.Step So still everything is OK

3. Step: Winwarbler ( with no mode-control from Commander) added to the configuration of 1. Step When the FT8 command sequence and subsequently the CW command sequence are invoked from Commander
- message flow shows the commands as in 1.Step So still everything is OK

4. Step: same configuration as 3.Step
Now the FT8 sequence and subsequently the CW sequence are invoked from Winwarbler (PSK31 / CW) These Commander command sequences are part of my PSK and CW start-up makros.
This has set again both VFOs to CW and same frequency (AB command). No split.
After the AB command only the normal status polling/reporting occurs.
When I set the radio to Split and click into CW Skimmer -VFO-A is commanded to its previous frequency -VFO-B is commanded to the click-frequency -VFO-B is commanded to PKT-U mode So the problem has come up and seems to have someting to do with Winwarbler

5. Step: Winwarbler terminated
FT8 command sequence and subsequently the CW command sequence are invoked from Commander When I set the radio to Split and click into CW Skimmer -VFO-A is commanded to its previous frequency -VFO-B is commanded to the click-frequency -VFO-B is commanded to PKT-U mode So the problem persists in spite of WW having been terminated

The only way out now is to teminate and restart Commander.

+ Thanks, Wolf!

+ It's clear from your description above that incorrect commands are being sent to the radio while "CW Skimmer to Commander" is running. I do not have the source code to this application. Thus I suggest that you report the above behavior to its author Dick W3OA; I will be happy to assist Dick if he needs help.

<http://dickwilliams.byethost17.com/SkimmerToCommander.html?i=1>

73,

Dave, AA6YQ


Re: Commander + CW Skimmer to Commander - strange behaviour

Wolf, DK1FW
 

Dave,

I did as you suggested and recorded the Commander Message flow in a step-by-step scenario.

1. Step: only Commander, CW Skimmer to Commander and CW Skimmer are started
Commander's initial command sequence sets both VFOs to CW and same frequency (AB command). No split.
After the AB command only the normal status polling/reporting occurs.
When I set the radio to Split and click into CW Skimmer
-VFO-A is commanded to its previous frequency
-VFO-B is commanded to the click-frequency
-VFO-B is commanded to CW mode
So everything works as it should

2. Step: same configuration as in 1. Step
I invoke my FT8 command sequence, which puts VFO-A(RX) into USB with 4kHz bandwidth and VFO-B(TX) to PKT-U.
After that I invoke my CW command sequence, which is the same as Commander's initial command sequence.
When I then set Split and click into CW Skimmer
- message flow shows the commands as in 1.Step
So still everything is OK

3. Step: Winwarbler ( with no mode-control from Commander) added to the configuration of 1. Step
When the FT8 command sequence and subsequently the CW command sequence are invoked from Commander
- message flow shows the commands as in 1.Step
So still everything is OK

4. Step: same configuration as 3.Step
Now the FT8 sequence and subsequently the CW sequence are invoked from Winwarbler (PSK31 / CW)
These Commander command sequences are part of my PSK and CW start-up makros.
This has set again both VFOs to CW and same frequency (AB command). No split.
After the AB command only the normal status polling/reporting occurs.
When I set the radio to Split and click into CW Skimmer
-VFO-A is commanded to its previous frequency
-VFO-B is commanded to the click-frequency
-VFO-B is commanded to PKT-U mode
So the problem has come up and seems to have someting to do with Winwarbler

5. Step: Winwarbler terminated
FT8 command sequence and subsequently the CW command sequence are invoked from Commander
When I set the radio to Split and click into CW Skimmer
-VFO-A is commanded to its previous frequency
-VFO-B is commanded to the click-frequency
-VFO-B is commanded to PKT-U mode
So the problem persists in spite of WW having been terminated

The only way out now is to teminate and restart Commander.

Puzzled !

Am 23.10.2020 um 00:10 schrieb Dave AA6YQ:

+ AA6YQ comments below
Definitely! After executing the macro/command sequence I can verify on the Ft5000 display that VFO-B is in CW mode.

+ OK, then use Commander's Messages window to capture the flow of CAT commands to your radio. Locate the AB; command in this flow, and then look for the subsequent CAT command that sets VFO B to the wrong mode.

       73,

              Dave, AA6YQ



Re: N1MM-DXKeeper Gateway version 1.1.6

Dave AA6YQ
 

68 of 70 engines available via VirusTotal found no malware in N1MM_DXK_GW.exe

0 of 15 engines available via Jotti found no malware in N1MM_DXK_GW.exe

N1MM_DXK_GW.exe has been submitted to Microsoft Security Intelligence; it generally takes them 12 hours to scan a submitted file.

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

-----Original Message-----
From: DXLab@groups.io [mailto:DXLab@groups.io] On Behalf Of Dave AA6YQ
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 12:10 AM
To: DXLab@groups.io
Subject: [DXLab] N1MM-DXKeeper Gateway version 1.1.6

This version

- correctly handles the multiple QSOs created by N1MM when a county line QSO is logged during a State QSO Party contest

- provides an option to direct DXKeeper to query its currently configured callbook and augment the information in the logged QSO
with the results of that query

- provides options to direct DXKeeper to automatically upload each logged QSO to eQSL.cc, LoTW, and Club Log

- maintains a visible log of completed operations

- provides an option to force the creation and maintenance of a diagnostic errorlog, and a button to display the errorlog

- updates the documentation file <http://www.dxlabsuite.com/N1MM-DXKeeper/index.htm>


To obtain version 1.1.6 of the N1MM-DXKeeper Gateway, download its zip archive from

<https://www.dxlabsuite.com/N1MM-DXKeeper/N1MM_DXK_GW.zip>

and extract the application it contains into the folder of your choice.


I am not a contester, but I did test this version by logging multiple QSOs from N1MM+ version 1.0.8701

Many thanks to all who contributed to the understanding of N1MM's handling of county line QSOs in State QSO Parties!

73,

Dave, AA6YQ









--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com


N1MM-DXKeeper Gateway version 1.1.6

Dave AA6YQ
 

This version

- correctly handles the multiple QSOs created by N1MM when a county line QSO is logged during a State QSO Party contest

- provides an option to direct DXKeeper to query its currently configured callbook and augment the information in the logged QSO
with the results of that query

- provides options to direct DXKeeper to automatically upload each logged QSO to eQSL.cc, LoTW, and Club Log

- maintains a visible log of completed operations

- provides an option to force the creation and maintenance of a diagnostic errorlog, and a button to display the errorlog

- updates the documentation file <http://www.dxlabsuite.com/N1MM-DXKeeper/index.htm>


To obtain version 1.1.6 of the N1MM-DXKeeper Gateway, download its zip archive from

<https://www.dxlabsuite.com/N1MM-DXKeeper/N1MM_DXK_GW.zip>

and extract the application it contains into the folder of your choice.


I am not a contester, but I did test this version by logging multiple QSOs from N1MM+ version 1.0.8701

Many thanks to all who contributed to the understanding of N1MM's handling of county line QSOs in State QSO Parties!

73,

Dave, AA6YQ

3141 - 3160 of 200078