Re: Low priority feature request


Joe Subich, W4TV
 

+ Note that the database field names did not change, but importing
and exporting ADIF and TDF has long been updated.
Except that means it is still necessary to use the APP_DXKeeper_ form
when writing SQL queries/scripts which is a PITA and makes reading or
debugging queries/scripts more difficult.

73,

... Joe, W4TV


On 2021-10-19 1:24 PM, Dave AA6YQ wrote:
+ AA6YQ comments below
There are also ADIF defined fields for EQSL_QSLSDATE EQSL_QSLRDATE EQSL_QSL_SENT, EQSL_QSL_RCVD, LOTW_QSLRDATE, LOTW_QSLSDATE, LOTW_QSL_SENT, and LOTW_QSL_RCVD where DXKeeper uses equivalent APP_DXKeeper_ tags. It would be nice if DXKeeper dropped the APP_DXKeeper_ (application defined) tag in favor of the equivalent standard tag.
+ That was done back when those fields were added to ADIF, Joe. See the "ADIF Field Name" column in the "Online QSL Items" section of
https://www.dxlabsuite.com/dxkeeper/Help/Items.htm
+ Note that the database field names did not change, but importing and exporting ADIF and TDF has long been updated.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ

Join DXLab@groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.