Re: QRZ again?

eddy on5jk

I must confess, dave’s reaction and all other reactions scared me .
Yes i know, taking payed XML subscription could possibly solve many of my personal problems i encountered.
I only thought that my observations could be of any interest to somebody.
Personally i am used to use QRZ., and personally i dont like it to be removed from PF.
From now on, i will take it as it is, and never complain anymore about it.
It only happens with a new Callsign. Once there is a QSO in DXK, next time data are in the log and used so by PF.
Still finding that the DXLabSuite is the finest program ever seen.
Sorry for stealing your time Dave.
I apologise.
Eddy ON5JK

From: 'Dave AA6YQ' aa6yq@... [dxlab]
Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2017 12:21 AM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: RE: [dxlab] QRZ again?

>>>AA6YQ comments below

-----Original Message-----
From: dxlab@... [mailto:dxlab@...]
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 5:38 PM
To: dxlab@...
Subject: RE: [dxlab] QRZ again?

I must say I see a large number of requests for Pathfinder help and thus diversion of Dave's, AA6YQ, time to respond to and fix these requests.

However, fixing this may be an ethical issue, not a convenience to DXKeeper users issue.

The DXLab community possibly doesn't understand that the QRZ errors come from Pathfinder's attempt to read a web site intended for human consumption and extracting it's best guess what is the desired QSL/contact/location information. QRZ occasionally changes the format of the data presentation for security, style, and software updates. It is their right to do so. Microsoft changes their offerings regularly. So why can't QRZ?

>>>QRZ is free to change their web page however and whenever they like.

Guess what? QRZ doesn't want DXLabs or any other program to programmatically access their Web Site.

>>>That's not correct.

>>>I have discussed Pathfinder with owner Fred AA6BQ on several occasions. DXKeeper's free " via Pathfinder" option exists with his blessing. Fred can ask me to remove it at any time; were he to do so, I would immediately comply. So far, he's only asked that the rate of callbook lookups via this mechanism be limited to one every 4 seconds -- a policy implemented in DXKeeper several years ago.

>>>Note that Pathfinder displays QRZ's advertising, and thus does not diminish QRZ revenues - as would a scheme that scrapes downloaded HTML without displaying it to the user.

>>>My point earlier today is that if QRZ, for whatever reason, is no longer sending information in the same format to every user, then it may no longer be possible to maintain " via Pathfinder.

>>>Removing the " via Pathfinder" option from DXKeeper would require no change to Pathfinder, nor would it simplify the web browser issues discussed here in a different thread.


Dave, AA6YQ


Join to automatically receive all group messages.