toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
No I don't know for sure, I've disassembled them in all configurations.
The Service Manual shows, the 9" with the short shoe to the rear, but that really means not a lot, given the general nature of the Crosley Service Manual.
Sorry to be of so little help,
On 10/10/2019 8:46 PM, David Reina via Groups.Io wrote:
Also Butch I have some lining material that I bought a long time ago and which was rough cut into long and short lengths. The short ones are 7 1/2??? and the long ones are longer than the shoes and will need to be cut down. Any suggestion on how to orient the shorter pieces?
On Oct 10, 2019, at 8:20 PM, Butch via Groups.Io <email@example.com> wrote:
Crosley, like most manufacturers, used a long and a short shoe, this was done for various reasons.
When we had Service Motors, and when I do shoes here, now, I use long linings on all shoes. There is no detrimental reason not too.
Crosleys, especially the 6" cable braked cars, can use all the braking/stopping power that they can muster up.
On 10/10/2019 8:14 PM, David Reina via Groups.Io wrote:
I am trying to rivet new brake linings onto the cast iron shoes for my 47 sedan. I am ready to cut the linings and drill them for the rivets but am confused by some information in my old manual. It says??? The service brake lining( for use on brake shoes with rivets ) is 1??? shorter in the cam end and is assembled on the brake shoe toward the adjustment.??? Will someone decipher this for me. Both shoes end up at the cam and all eight linings I removed were the same length and all the same spacing on the shoe. About 7/16??? from each end of the shoe. I was hoping to get this done tonight so I could try and install them this weekend. I could go with the length of what was removed but am wondering if I am missing something.