#### Please explain to me how works the VFO's

Gerard

Hello,
I’m a little confused with the VFO’s A and B.

In the code of the µbitx 4 it is noted VFOA= 71500000 and VFOB= 14150000 (see capture 2)
On one example of µbitx, we have like goods values. See picture 1. (It's for V6, but it's the same utilisation)
On my home made µbitx, i have VFO A 14157500, VFOB 32988500.
From which this value is displayed?
If it is a frequency that exists again, where to measure it?
Is it clock1? In this case there would be an error on the synoptics?

How to have correct values? Must important!!!!
I do not find in the yellow menu
--> Calibration is to have the real frequency that you receive on the screen, I think
--> BFO adjustment, is for alignement of the Xtal 12MHZ filter, i think.

Jack, W8TEE

It this a typo
VFOA= 71500000
or do you really mean 71MHz. Same with VFOB at 32MHz.

Jack, W8TEE

On Wednesday, September 9, 2020, 3:38:53 PM EDT, Gerard <kabupos@...> wrote:

Hello,
I’m a little confused with the VFO’s A and B.

In the code of the µbitx 4 it is noted VFOA= 71500000 and VFOB= 14150000 (see capture 2)
On one example of µbitx, we have like goods values. See picture 1. (It's for V6, but it's the same utilisation)
On my home made µbitx, i have VFO A 14157500, VFOB 32988500.
From which this value is displayed?
If it is a frequency that exists again, where to measure it?
Is it clock1? In this case there would be an error on the synoptics?

How to have correct values? Must important!!!!
I do not find in the yellow menu
--> Calibration is to have the real frequency that you receive on the screen, I think
--> BFO adjustment, is for alignement of the Xtal 12MHZ filter, i think.

--
Jack, W8TEE

Gerard

Jack,
yes, Yes, there is no typo.

I would like to understand how it works, and especially if these values are fixed or slightly adapted, but they must remain in the same order of magnitude. 15mhz and 71mhz.
cdt

Gerard

Jack,
My µBbitx is homemade, it has never been initialized in the factory.
So, you may have to force the values with the manager or execute the following procedure (This is in the code of the µbitx V4)
Because in fact if I make a reinit factory of my µBitx, I always get the same bad values?

here the code:

/**
* This procedure is only for those who have a signal generator/transceiver tuned to exactly 7.150 and a dummy load
*/

void btnWaitForClick(){
while(!btnDown())
active_delay(50);
while(btnDown())
active_delay(50);
active_delay(50);
}

/**
* Take a deep breath, math(ematics) ahead
* The 25 mhz oscillator is multiplied by 35 to run the vco at 875 mhz
* This is divided by a number to generate different frequencies.
* If we divide it by 875, we will get 1 mhz signal
* So, if the vco is shifted up by 875 hz, the generated frequency of 1 mhz is shifted by 1 hz (875/875)
* At 12 Mhz, the carrier will needed to be shifted down by 12 hz for every 875 hz of shift up of the vco
*
*/

void factory_alignment(){

calibrateClock();

if (calibration == 0){
printLine2("Setup Aborted");
return;
}

//move it away to 7.160 for an LSB signal
setFrequency(7170000l);
updateDisplay();
printLine2("#2 BFO");
active_delay(1000);

usbCarrier = 11994999l;

if (usbCarrier == 11994999l){
printLine2("Setup Aborted");
return;
}

printLine2("#3:Test 3.5MHz");
isUSB = false;
setFrequency(3500000l);
updateDisplay();

while (!btnDown()){
checkPTT();
active_delay(100);
}

btnWaitForClick();
printLine2("#4:Test 7MHz");

setFrequency(7150000l);
updateDisplay();
while (!btnDown()){
checkPTT();
active_delay(100);
}

btnWaitForClick();
printLine2("#5:Test 14MHz");

isUSB = true;
setFrequency(14000000l);
updateDisplay();
while (!btnDown()){
checkPTT();
active_delay(100);
}

btnWaitForClick();
printLine2("#6:Test 28MHz");

setFrequency(28000000l);
updateDisplay();
while (!btnDown()){
checkPTT();
active_delay(100);
}

printLine2("Alignment done");
active_delay(1000);

isUSB = false;
setFrequency(7150000l);
updateDisplay();

}

Gerard

By the way, silly question about the Arduino software.
When uploading, does it only take into account the selected tab or does it do it for everything?
If it only takes the selected tab, then I will miss a piece of program!! LOL
My faith, interested to know anyway.
I don’t know?

Jack, W8TEE

Everything in the tabs is compiled and uploaded as part of the program. The compiler generates the code and the linker stitches everything together correctly. All of this is hidden behind the IDE.

Jack, W8TEE

On Wednesday, September 9, 2020, 4:24:32 PM EDT, Gerard <kabupos@...> wrote:

By the way, silly question about the Arduino software.
When uploading, does it only take into account the selected tab or does it do it for everything?
If it only takes the selected tab, then I will miss a piece of program!! LOL
My faith, interested to know anyway.
I don’t know?

--
Jack, W8TEE

Evan Hand

Gerard,
I believe that there is a typo.  Go back and count the zeros in the second capture you provided.

To answer your question, vfoA and vfoB are memory locations where the program is storing the values that the operator has selected.  Depending on which one is active, that value is used to adjust the internal oscillator (Clock2 for main frequency) which is APPROXIMATELY 45MHz + the vfoA or vfoB depending on which is selected.

So if the vfoA = 7.100200 MHz (7100.200kHz)
Then the Clock2 VFO of the Si5351a will be set to approximately 7.1002 + 45 MHz = 52.1002 MHz

If the vfoB is 14.19735 MHz (14197.35 kHz) and selected then Clock2 of the Si5351a is approximately 59.19735 MHz.

Hope this helps.
73
Evan
AC9TU

Gerard

hello,
The view plays tricks on me, I saw a zero more. thanks for the explanations. I’ll do tests this afternoon
cd

Gerard

Evan, Jack,

Evan, jack,
May you confirm one thing.
Are these two values fixed and never changed??

I don't understood:  i fixed these values with the manager, after close normally the connexion.
i reboot the µbitx. VFOa and b values coorect.
I tried some bands, modify the frequency with the encoder.
If i try the screen touch VFOA/VFOB , the values changed and i confirm that with the manager. (Values changed!!)
Is an error of manipulation? or other?
if you should never touch the VFO button, then why display it?
If I have to, I’ll test another version to see the behavior.
Thank's

If you should never touch the VFO button, then why display it.

version is 4.3

Evan Hand

Gerard,
The vfoA and vfoB are two places where you can set the frequency of operation.  They can be two different values to allow to switch between them, or they can be set to receive on vfoA and transmit on vfoB (for RIT operation).  They will change if you adjust the frequency.

I am not sure what you are trying to do.  It seems that it is working correctly, so what is the problem that you are trying to solve?

Here is the operation manual for the v6 software:
https://www.hfsignals.com/index.php/ubitx-v6-operations/

Operations manual for the KD8CEC software:

Original v2 to v5 one of the operation manual:

There are many more that you can find if you search on the internet.

Hope the above helps.

73
Evan
AC9TU

Gerard

Evan, Jack
I took over the calibration and adjustment of the BFO with a generator and an oscilloscope.
I checked the entire amplification chain and did 0 beats more to the oscilloscope than to the ear.
I think he’s all lined up now.
I compared the M0thy schema and the Ubitx v6 schema.
I have for the moment a 50 ohm resistance which was directly adjacent to the antenna amplifier input winding. This resistance does not exist on the V6. I’ve undone it for now
I did a test, but still, the sound is too low (even the background noise). It is especially after the 12mHZ filter
I did a test with a temporary antenna that’s more of a long wire.
I have conversations (A little deformed) and morse on 3 and 5 mhz, but as said before the sound is weak.
First I have to make a real antenna.
I think a square loop antenna will be easier to do. But first, I have to find out why the signal is too low when the 12MHZ filter is released. I think that even without an antenna, I must have a "loud" background sound.
By the way, smeter’s still on nine, maybe it’s a lead

cdt

Jack, W8TEE

Are you using the µBITX or the JackAl?

Jack, W8TEE

On Friday, September 11, 2020, 2:09:01 PM EDT, Gerard <kabupos@...> wrote:

Evan, Jack
I took over the calibration and adjustment of the BFO with a generator and an oscilloscope.
I checked the entire amplification chain and did 0 beats more to the oscilloscope than to the ear.
I think he’s all lined up now.
I compared the M0thy schema and the Ubitx v6 schema.
I have for the moment a 50 ohm resistance which was directly adjacent to the antenna amplifier input winding. This resistance does not exist on the V6. I’ve undone it for now
I did a test, but still, the sound is too low (even the background noise). It is especially after the 12mHZ filter
I did a test with a temporary antenna that’s more of a long wire.
I have conversations (A little deformed) and morse on 3 and 5 mhz, but as said before the sound is weak.
First I have to make a real antenna.
I think a square loop antenna will be easier to do. But first, I have to find out why the signal is too low when the 12MHZ filter is released. I think that even without an antenna, I must have a "loud" background sound.
By the way, smeter’s still on nine, maybe it’s a lead

cdt

--
Jack, W8TEE

Gerard

Jack,
Remenber. It's an home made. Pcb, tricoils, the case  and others. All is made with my hands!!!
It's a big project, but beautifull to do.
I bought components with Amazon in china, great britain with Ebay. Also in France.
You’re going to say it’s expensive, but it’s a choice
i think we are getting close to the goal.we need to understand how things work and right settings. We make progress day by day.

To see how to do the home made:  https://ubitx.net/2018/07/02/homebrew-ubitx-with-through-hole-components/

cdt

Jack, W8TEE

So, are you using the software distributed by HF Signals or some 3rd party?

Jack, W8TEE

On Friday, September 11, 2020, 3:13:58 PM EDT, Gerard <kabupos@...> wrote:

Jack,
Remenber. It's an home made. Pcb, tricoils, the case  and others. All is made with my hands!!!
It's a big project, but beautifull to do.
I bought components with Amazon in china, great britain with Ebay. Also in France.
You’re going to say it’s expensive, but it’s a choice
i think we are getting close to the goal.we need to understand how things work and right settings. We make progress day by day.

To see how to do the home made:  https://ubitx.net/2018/07/02/homebrew-ubitx-with-through-hole-components/

cdt

--
Jack, W8TEE

Evan Hand

The other question is which display are you using?

As far as I can tell from the schematic that is referenced in the link you provided, it is equal to a v3 or v4 board.  You should use one of the schematics from HFSignals for one of those boards for reference.

The Ashhar Farhan stock software from either the v4 or v4 should work. The alternative is the KD8CEC software.   As I had stated before, I would go with the KD8CEC software and the Nextion display.  You could use the 1602 parallel input display as well.  Both can work with that software.  You will need to select the version for the display that you choose.

The v6 software will not work without a lot of modifications.  I do not know of a version that allows adjustment for different (earlier) boards.  This includes the version from Reed N.

73
Evan
AC9TU

Gerard

Hello,

It's version V4 + nextion
All is ok for the soft i think. i can go in all the options of the menu + calibration + BFO
The Nextion work
The main menu works with the frequency display, etc
I hear conversations, but the sound is weak.
It falls after the 12Mhz filter.
I need to recontrol this part.
cdt

Evan Hand

Gerard,

I would try using the IF Shift function in the KD8CEC software to see if that helps.  There could be an alignment issue between the 45 MHz roofing filter and the second IF vfo.  The IF Shift changes the second IF vfo frequency a small amount in either direction.

The other thing that I would try is to remove the AGC function with Q1 by removing the gate signal.  Q1 could be drawing down the input to the audio amp too much.  I do not see a way to adjust that level.

Just suggestions for you to try.
73
Evan
AC9TU

Gerard

Evan, jack
At first I improved my provisional antenna, it is very slightly better.
I think I’m on to something, and that would be more in the design.
The 45MHZ filter is a little different on the M0thy model. However, for the 2 selfs, it uses axial inductances. Me, I wound these 2 inductances on tores. So the tores are glued together next to each other. There must be an induction effect.
Look at the pictures, it’s very airy on the µBitx and much less on mine.
This may be the solution!!
I’m going to desold and replace the tores. It doesn’t cost anything to do it.
cdt

Gary Anderson

Hi Gerard,
You don't want the inductors in parallel, especially at close distances.
If trying the axials, still don't mount them in parallel.

With your layout, use the Z-Axis to be orthogonal.

| -----|
L     |
L     |
L     |
|     |----
| PCB  |

--LLLL--
| PCB  |

Beyond my expertise, but I would venture that you would be better off with rewinding one toroid  with longer leads and mounting it 90 degrees off in either the Y or Z plane.
You can experiment, and others with more experience can give advice.  Electrically, no reason why both are on the same side of the PCB.  (e.g. 1 toroid flat on the bottom of the PCB)

Regards,
Gary

Gerard

hello,
I did some tests again today. The change on the inductances coming out of the 45 mhz filter did nothing more.
I think it’s at its limits and it lacks sensitivity
I compared the shematic (see pdf)  and that of a V3 --->
I see only a pb on schematic on the 1st transistor and the resistance of 220ohm.

The collector is directly connected on the power RX, on µbitx V3, it's pass trought this resistance.
Schematic error and good on the PCB. I will check tomorrow.
Or it doesn’t matter how it works. A transistor specialist will tell us that. In any case, as already said, we will make the modification if necessary.
There is also a small difference in the 45mhz filter and impedances. (see schématic)
If I test with RFsim 99 the filter made of 2 inductances of 0.8µH and capa of 6.8pf, it indicates a loss of 10db at 45mhz. This is not negligible.
So there’s still a test to be done.
Otherwise, on the 7MHZ, I have a lot of conversations,English, Italian, Deuch, but still weak.You need to stick your ear to the speaker.
Amplificator works fine, I tested it with another source
cdt

 1 - 20 of 25
More