Re: Narrow filter for CW
#ubitxcw
Yes I was hoping to steal someones design and spend less than 10 dollars.
Have to agree that adding a 300 dollar filter to a radio that I bought used for 45 dollars is not going to happen.
|
|
Re: Narrow filter for CW
#ubitxcw
Gordon Gibby <ggibby@...>
You can put in an op amp analog filter for very small outlay of cash.
I can remember building my first audio filter in the dark ages around 1973. Used toroids probably surplus from the phone company to build filters, and vacuum tubes to amplify the audio signals. Worked pretty good!!! Far far easier today. Gordon ________________________________________ From: BITX20@groups.io <BITX20@groups.io> on behalf of _Dave_ K0MBT <davesters@...> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 7:08 AM To: BITX20@groups.io Subject: Re: [BITX20] Narrow filter for CW #ubitxcw Yes I was hoping to steal someones design and spend less than 10 dollars. Have to agree that adding a 300 dollar filter to a radio that I bought used for 45 dollars is not going to happen.
|
|
Re: Narrow filter for CW
#ubitxcw
Tom, wb6b
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 04:13 AM, Gordon Gibby wrote:
Used toroids probably surplus from the phone companyYes, those were popular back in the day for home-brew projects. Many folks built RTTY demodulators with them. Tom, wb6b
|
|
Re: Narrow filter for CW
#ubitxcw
Dale Hardin
But, where will you mount the transceiver on the filter board?
|
|
Carrier suppression on uBITX v5 - -35 to -40 dB ok?
Rob French (KC4UPR)
For USB/LSB on the uBITX, what is a reasonable carrier suppression? (and how is that properly measured, i.e. I assume it's carrier relative to peak?)
Background: I should have left well enough alone, but... I've been using my uBITX for FT8 and PSK31, and had directly connected my uBITX mic input to my USB soundcard's headphone output, and my uBITX speaker output to my USB soundcard's mic input. No special adapter circuits or anything. Worked fine, bunch of good QSOs. Fast forward, I was reading about interface circuits, and saw someone said that I MUST put a blocking capacitor between the respective inputs/outputs. Well, I didn't do that. Also read about someone saying that a few volts into the mic input could kill diodes in the balanced modulator, leading to carrier leak through. So then I got paranoid and figured I should check my signal to make sure I hadn't done something like that. Which brings us to now... Test Setup: uBITX v5 transmitting into a dummy load. RTL-SDR dongle plugged into my PC, operating in direct mode. "Tone generator": me whistling into the mic. GQRX running on my PC to view the spectrum. Just eyeballing the spectrum display. Results: (1) with background noise only ... noise floor ~ -75 to -80 dB on GQRX readout. With PTT on, no tone, desired sideband ~ -75 to -70 db, carrier ~ -75 to -70 db (visibly distinct from desired sideband), opposite sideband absent. (2) with a tone ... noise floor ~ -75 to -80 dB on GQRX readout. With PTT on, "whistle" tone, desired sideband ~ -35 dB (peak), carrier seems to be unchanged (-70 to -75 or so), opposite sideband still absent (carrier kind of gets lost in the spectrum from my "whistle" at this point, but as I increase the volume from nothing, the carrier appears to be staying the same). Does this all seem reasonable? Thanks! -Rob (PS - As an aside, I checked the DC bias on the USB sound card mic in and headphone out... mic in ~ 2V, which I assume it to drive electrets, and headphone out is 0V)
|
|
Re: Narrow filter for CW
#ubitxcw
Gordon Gibby <ggibby@...>
Too funny!
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Aug 16, 2019, at 09:10, Dale Hardin <joe.dale.hardin@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: V5.1 and Nextion 5”
Joe Puma
Looks good
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Joe KD2NFC
On Aug 16, 2019, at 5:22 AM, Murray Wills (ZL2IQ) <murray@...> wrote:
|
|
Thanks Peter!
Beside all the TX circuitry, the relay is also driving two other relay coils, so I wonder if that may cause a bit of stress too? Initial resistance of the relay coils in parallel might be pretty low. I don't know the draw of the TX (not counting the finals on a separate circuit) but I don't think it woul be close to 2A? So looking at sequencing, or just a beefier relay may be the long term answer. 73, Mark PS: I suspect the 28W may be due to Don running the finals at more than 12V?
|
|
Re: Narrow filter for CW
#ubitxcw
Vince Vielhaber
I did the same thing in the late 70s with a fone company toroid and a cap. Made for one sharp CW filter. I just recently removed it from my 75A-4 receiver, didn't work that well anymore, the cap was all dried out and I don't do enough CW to need it.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Vince - K8ZW.
On 08/16/2019 07:13 AM, Gordon Gibby wrote:
You can put in an op amp analog filter for very small outlay of cash.
|
|
Re: Narrow filter for CW
#ubitxcw
Dale Hardin
For those who don't get the joke...
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 8:48 AM Gordon Gibby <ggibby@...> wrote:
Dale Hardin 24750 State St. Unit 487 Elberta, AL 36530 251-597-9256 --
Dale Hardin, KS4NS Elberta, AL
|
|
Re: Narrow filter for CW
#ubitxcw
MVS Sarma
Why not use max7400 as a n lpf. It is a nice 8 pin dip and/or smď Spend a while to study the datasheet. It can become variable lpf.
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019, 4:38 pm _Dave_ K0MBT, <davesters@...> wrote: Yes I was hoping to steal someones design and spend less than 10 dollars.
|
|
Re: Narrow filter for CW
#ubitxcw
MVS Sarma
My reply is for limited use at audio level. Sorry. May not be relavent.
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019, 9:11 pm Mvs Sarma, <mvssarma@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: V5.1 and Nextion 5”
Mark Hatch
Fantastic! Glad to see another 5" out there.
73 Mark AJ6CU
|
|
Re: Narrow filter for CW
#ubitxcw
Frank Dinger , EI7KS
Regarding a CW filter , a simple audio filter with 2 or 3 Amps from a Quad-opamp might be a simple start for good CW listening. There are many circuits on the Web.
Frank , EI7KS
|
|
ubitx s-meter swr-meter help
#bitx20
#bitx40
#bitx40help
#arduino
#calibration
circular.simetry@...
Hello i am using the 1.80 firmware from KD8CEC on my ubitx with a 2X16 lcd display and i have noticed the s-meter bargraph is working only in Rx mode, but when i switch to TX gets stuck with the last value . I want to use the bargraph while transmit to measure the power or the swr. i think the display update is disabled while tx in the source code. any help wil be appreciated, thanks in advance 73! YO4HUJ Adrian.
|
|
Re: Calibration success
#ubitx
#calibration
Dean Souleles
Thank you Leonard. This particular mic doesn’t have a preamp....so no chance of over driving.
Dean
|
|
Re: Carrier suppression on uBITX v5 - -35 to -40 dB ok?
Tom, wb6b
Hi,
I just double checked the schematic. It looks like there is adequate DC blocking capacitors in the mike input circuit. Also, the mike input already has a DC voltage applied to power the microphone. So, unless the sound card doesn't like the DC voltages and causes distortion, it is likely not the source of the carrier leakage. I'm not sure how much is good or bad, but the topic of carrier suppression and fixes has come up on this group. Hopefully, other may be able to shed more light on what level is acceptable. I have had good success with connecting the high side of the volume control directly to the microphone input of a USB sound dongle. And the headphone output of the USB sound dongle directly to the microphone input of the uBitx. Some sound adaptors may work better or worse in this configuration, but the generic adaptor used seems fine in this arrangement. It is possible some sound adaptors might not like the DC voltage (but low current) the uBitx puts on the microphone input applied to the headphone output. Tom, wb6b
|
|
Re: Carrier suppression on uBITX v5 - -35 to -40 dB ok?
Ashhar Farhan
The carrier to signal ratio needs to define the signal level as well. A 'Haaalllowww' is usually insufficient (though I use it all the time). You could download a wav file of two tone and play that into the mic. That is the simpler way to do it properly. - f
On Sat 17 Aug, 2019, 1:34 PM Tom, wb6b, <wb6b@...> wrote: Hi,
|
|
Re: Carrier suppression on uBITX v5 - -35 to -40 dB ok?
Gordon Gibby <ggibby@...>
A significant number of sound interface systems will have a TRANSFORMER here and there. It is important in most cases to provide DC isolation to prevent the transformer from dramatically changing the biasing conditions of the mic input amplifier of the
radio to which it is connecgted. This blindsided me once when I connected a homebrew isolator (with transformers) to an icom 2 meter rig to do packet -- and the signals sounded horrible. You won't damage the transformer, but you can throw the linearity
of the mic-amp stage out the window. A Signalink in the same situation did FINE -- because it had capacitor dc-isolation. I learned the hard way to DC isolate.
Cheers, Gordon
From: BITX20@groups.io <BITX20@groups.io> on behalf of Tom, wb6b <wb6b@...>
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 4:04 AM To: BITX20@groups.io Subject: Re: [BITX20] Carrier suppression on uBITX v5 - -35 to -40 dB ok? Hi,
I just double checked the schematic. It looks like there is adequate DC blocking capacitors in the mike input circuit. Also, the mike input already has a DC voltage applied to power the microphone. So, unless the sound card doesn't like the DC voltages and causes distortion, it is likely not the source of the carrier leakage. I'm not sure how much is good or bad, but the topic of carrier suppression and fixes has come up on this group. Hopefully, other may be able to shed more light on what level is acceptable. I have had good success with connecting the high side of the volume control directly to the microphone input of a USB sound dongle. And the headphone output of the USB sound dongle directly to the microphone input of the uBitx. Some sound adaptors may work better or worse in this configuration, but the generic adaptor used seems fine in this arrangement. It is possible some sound adaptors might not like the DC voltage (but low current) the uBitx puts on the microphone input applied to the headphone output. Tom, wb6b
|
|
I have 4 uBITX radios and the first one had stuck the left side relay early on. I replaced it with a stock component and it has worked fine. None of the other machines has had a problem. This relay only carries signals on the receive side so no chance of spurious emissions.
Good luck with your repair. I approach repairs from the viewpoint of a repair technician rather than that of an engineer. I always get a chuckle with those who think they need a wall full of test equipment to fix these critters So far I have been able to resurrect all 3 uBITX radios determined to be junk by previous owners. 73 all Dave
|
|