This is a general question re CW missing dit/latency on the V6, and possibly others. First, I do not do iambic, never learned to do it. I am a straight key "ditty-bopper." Therefore, I wonder if the

I am satisfied that the main board is not in jeopardy of being replaced or made unavailable.

Well said, Ashhar, makes sense. Thank you, Ken, N2VIP

Hi Ted, Your idea is not new and there are a lot of radios that use solid state switching. You can implement QSK with electronic switching. "Semi-breakin" really means "not breakin":) I have been

I've thought of doing away with the physical relay switching between TX & RX, by using a power transistor to activate the RX whenever TX is not otherwise invoked, and another one to activate the TX

Hello, it’s hard to remember At least 2 a soundblaster and a graphics card. After that, I can’t remember whether a card was needed for the first CD players. The first x86 IBM had no hard drive, 2

If my ageing memory is still working, I seem to remember that some of the alternative software packages have fixed this problem. Several coders have written alternative software to add different

Hi Loris, Those older radios also don't have layers upon layers of menus just to dim the panel lights (or LEDs). That is something else I like about those wonderful older radios. I have some that

This sounds like a rather good idea - a super-Radiuno board that plugs into the existing ubitx. It would then presumably also provide an easy upgrade path for pre-v6 owners too if they wanted to go

Hi Bill, It is not necessary to have a "modern" radio to have a "perfect" radio for a thousand dollars ... try to compare the horrendous "modern" realizations with an "old" TR7, Collins KWM-380,

I would like to see that the unit come out like your first PC's that came out, everything plugged into the motherboard, sound card, video, memory card, you only upgraded one card to improve your PC

Hello Evan, I tested the amplifier. It’s working fine. I need to put shielded cables on the potentiometer because we’re picking up the 50Htz and it’s picking up a little bit. For Smeter, it

Hello, Yes, not in the good order. pb native language for me CAG = Contrôle aautomatique du gain for you AGC =automatic gain control it’s a bit difficult for me, because I have to use "Reverso"

Hi Loris, None of that was a complaint on my part. There are some simple things we can do to get better performance from the uBitX on CW. The digital modes use SSB anyway so those are not an issue at

Hi Ashhar, I think you have expressed yourself perfectly but, as always, everyone would like a version of hardware tailored to their specific use ... I think it is human and understandable. Excellent

Hi Bill The BITX and the whole µBITX series was born as an SSB rig, the possibility of use for the CW is only for occasional use as well as for other ways of communication (even the ILER series does

Hi, I worked on a V6 for another amateur. When it arrived I found the CW completely unusable. The other ham wanted Reed's software installed and when I did that the CW latency went away. Reed's

Thanks Evan, I'm getting the flat forehead thing now:) When I first read it I read it as AGC but then I had my chain jerked - "no wait. It says CAG". I was only halfway through my first coffee. It is

I didnt make myself clear enough. My bad. My suggestion was produce the v7, as a super-raduino board that just plugs into the existing ubitx. The connectors haven't changed since v3. A board with

Bill, I believe that it is AGC in the wrong order. Could be because of differences in the native language of one of the authors. Please forgive me if anything above is in error. 73 Evan AC9TU