|
Re: End Fed antennas w/ uBITX
#ubitx
Its not obvious so I'll try to explain.
Lets say we have two transformers (any for the moment save for they are the same).
Also the transformer have a separated primary and secondary as that makes it
Its not obvious so I'll try to explain.
Lets say we have two transformers (any for the moment save for they are the same).
Also the transformer have a separated primary and secondary as that makes it
|
By
ajparent1/KB1GMX <kb1gmx@...>
·
#55440
·
|
|
CW keying shape improvement in uBitx
I found that by simply increasing C1 to 2.2 uF (just parallel the existing 0.1 uF cap) the keying shape is greatly improved with about 3 ms attack and 6 ms decay. That is much better than the key
I found that by simply increasing C1 to 2.2 uF (just parallel the existing 0.1 uF cap) the keying shape is greatly improved with about 3 ms attack and 6 ms decay. That is much better than the key
|
By
n1kw@...
·
#55439
·
|
|
Re: Spurious RF at beginning of CW transmission in the uBitx
Bob
Interesting. Maybe that indicates that the solution by Allison is still best...?
Actively pulling the RX power line to ground when switching to transmit mode
seems productive. Could solve the
Bob
Interesting. Maybe that indicates that the solution by Allison is still best...?
Actively pulling the RX power line to ground when switching to transmit mode
seems productive. Could solve the
|
By
Arv Evans
·
#55438
·
|
|
Re: End Fed antennas w/ uBITX
#ubitx
Thanks for your efforts so far.
Alan
Thanks for your efforts so far.
Alan
|
By
Alan de G1FXB
·
#55437
·
|
|
Re: Spurious RF at beginning of CW transmission in the uBitx
Bob,
Try the ubuitx.net trick I poseted a day back. The two cross coupled 3904s to pull the unused
power line to ground.
Allison
Bob,
Try the ubuitx.net trick I poseted a day back. The two cross coupled 3904s to pull the unused
power line to ground.
Allison
|
By
ajparent1/KB1GMX <kb1gmx@...>
·
#55436
·
|
|
Re: End Fed antennas w/ uBITX
#ubitx
The cables add common mode inductance. That is an incorrect assumption as a result.
We had this conversation before. In this stream.
Allison
The cables add common mode inductance. That is an incorrect assumption as a result.
We had this conversation before. In this stream.
Allison
|
By
ajparent1/KB1GMX <kb1gmx@...>
·
#55435
·
|
|
Re: Spurious RF at beginning of CW transmission in the uBitx
UPDATE!!!!!
I tried my earlier suggestion about putting a diode in series with R66 and it causes another problem. The energy stored in C64 keeps the mic amplifier running for about a half a second
UPDATE!!!!!
I tried my earlier suggestion about putting a diode in series with R66 and it causes another problem. The energy stored in C64 keeps the mic amplifier running for about a half a second
|
By
n1kw@...
·
#55434
·
|
|
Re: End Fed antennas w/ uBITX
#ubitx
Allison
The transformers have a common ground shared by the primary and secondary. The coax pigtails connected to the low impedance side of each transformer were, along with the low side of both high
Allison
The transformers have a common ground shared by the primary and secondary. The coax pigtails connected to the low impedance side of each transformer were, along with the low side of both high
|
By
Warren Allgyer <allgyer@...>
·
#55433
·
|
|
Re: code compile
#bitx40
#firmware
Also, make sure you are using the latest version of the Arduino compiler.
Also, make sure you are using the latest version of the Arduino compiler.
|
By
Howard Fidel
·
#55432
·
|
|
Re: RF out
Mike, good cheat!
Me I pulled the connector and the pins and drilled three more holes and use
a PC mount SMA so it points straight up.
Made testing easier and it looks cool.
Allison
Mike, good cheat!
Me I pulled the connector and the pins and drilled three more holes and use
a PC mount SMA so it points straight up.
Made testing easier and it looks cool.
Allison
|
By
ajparent1/KB1GMX <kb1gmx@...>
·
#55431
·
|
|
Re: Need Help
Hi Allison,
Thanks for your help!
That what I thought so I order a replacement encoder from Digi-Key and installed it this morning still the same.
I just received my uBITX last week, it seemed to be
Hi Allison,
Thanks for your help!
That what I thought so I order a replacement encoder from Digi-Key and installed it this morning still the same.
I just received my uBITX last week, it seemed to be
|
By
bdunk@...
·
#55430
·
|
|
Re: code compile
#bitx40
#firmware
Is ubitx_cat.ino in the same directory as the V4.3 code?
There should be 7 files:
ubitx_si5351.ino
ubitx_menu.ino
ubitx_keyer.ino
ubutx_factory_alignment.ino
Is ubitx_cat.ino in the same directory as the V4.3 code?
There should be 7 files:
ubitx_si5351.ino
ubitx_menu.ino
ubitx_keyer.ino
ubutx_factory_alignment.ino
|
By
ajparent1/KB1GMX <kb1gmx@...>
·
#55429
·
|
|
Re: Need Help
Wheck wires/wiring and then check the encoder for possible failure.
The fact that you get some indications of activity suggests it is broken.
Allison
Wheck wires/wiring and then check the encoder for possible failure.
The fact that you get some indications of activity suggests it is broken.
Allison
|
By
ajparent1/KB1GMX <kb1gmx@...>
·
#55428
·
|
|
Re: End Fed antennas w/ uBITX
#ubitx
Warren,
Did you ground coax at the transformer to the the other in the back to back test?
For clarity a piece of heavy wire from the coax connector of one to the coax connector
of the other
Warren,
Did you ground coax at the transformer to the the other in the back to back test?
For clarity a piece of heavy wire from the coax connector of one to the coax connector
of the other
|
By
ajparent1/KB1GMX <kb1gmx@...>
·
#55427
·
|
|
Re: End Fed antennas w/ uBITX
#ubitx
Did the other participants grant permission to post that? As that would be my
first question. I see no such permission granted. As such if they ask the mods
to take it down I'd not be
Did the other participants grant permission to post that? As that would be my
first question. I see no such permission granted. As such if they ask the mods
to take it down I'd not be
|
By
ajparent1/KB1GMX <kb1gmx@...>
·
#55426
·
|
|
code compile
#bitx40
#firmware
hi
i loaded ubitx-v4.3-code into aduino iide and clicked on compile/verify
the error message " checkCAT() not declared in this scope
what has gone wrong
note - i have no trouble in compiling the
hi
i loaded ubitx-v4.3-code into aduino iide and clicked on compile/verify
the error message " checkCAT() not declared in this scope
what has gone wrong
note - i have no trouble in compiling the
|
By
terry hughes
·
#55425
·
|
|
Re: ND6T AGC and Click kit wiring notes
Yes, the AGC mini-kit works with the Ver-4 uBITX board.
Ordering info and a lot more is in the "Files" section of this reflector under my call.
73 Kees K5BCQ
Yes, the AGC mini-kit works with the Ver-4 uBITX board.
Ordering info and a lot more is in the "Files" section of this reflector under my call.
73 Kees K5BCQ
|
By
Kees T
·
#55424
·
|
|
Re: Spurious RF at beginning of CW transmission in the uBitx
Bob
Agreed. That sounds good.
Arv
Bob
Agreed. That sounds good.
Arv
|
By
Arv Evans
·
#55422
·
|
|
Re: Spurious RF at beginning of CW transmission in the uBitx
Hi Arv,
It is probably a good idea to have some series resistance in the circuit (over and above that of the diodes) to limit the peak current to the 47 uF capacitors during RX-TX-RX transitions and
Hi Arv,
It is probably a good idea to have some series resistance in the circuit (over and above that of the diodes) to limit the peak current to the 47 uF capacitors during RX-TX-RX transitions and
|
By
n1kw@...
·
#55421
·
|
|
Re: Spurious RF at beginning of CW transmission in the uBitx
Bob N1KW
I'm a bit short on time right now, but when finished with a current project I will
revisit a few older pre-uBITX transceivers (BITX17A, and a BITX40A) to see
if the diode idea will work on
Bob N1KW
I'm a bit short on time right now, but when finished with a current project I will
revisit a few older pre-uBITX transceivers (BITX17A, and a BITX40A) to see
if the diode idea will work on
|
By
Arv Evans
·
#55420
·
|