Date   
Re: Are the uBITX receivers ripe for improvement? -- And some other miscellaneous thoughts. By richcarter03052 <re.carter@...> · #48949 ·
Re: uBITXII By richcarter03052 <re.carter@...> · #48948 ·
Re: Tx doesn’t transmit nor rx off By Tim Gorman · #48947 ·
Re: uBITX narrow IF filter mod for CW, anyone tried this? By Mark Kesner · #48946 ·
Re: Are the uBITX receivers ripe for improvement? -- And some other miscellaneous thoughts. By Tim Gorman · #48945 ·
Re: Buyer beware! RD16HHF1 By ulf.jagfors@... · #48944 ·
Re: boosting the power on 28 MHz #ubitx By Tim Gorman · #48943 ·
Re: uBITXII By Ashhar Farhan · #48942 ·
Re: uBITXII By VE7CWS WRSeiler <waltrseiler@...> · #48941 ·
Re: Should we adopt the KD8CEC firmware? By G1KQH · #48940 ·
Re: uBITXII By _Dave_ AD0B · #48939 ·
Tx doesn’t transmit nor rx off By César EA3IAV · #48938 ·
First microBitx contact By tonyrazzell2@... · #48937 ·
Re: Are the uBITX receivers ripe for improvement? -- And some other miscellaneous thoughts. By 4Z1NT · #48936 ·
Re: Are the uBITX receivers ripe for improvement? -- And some other miscellaneous thoughts. By iz oos · #48934 ·
Re: can I bypass the CP2102 chip on the NANO with an FTDI based serial adapter? #arduino #cp2102 #ftdi #nano By Tom, wb6b · #48932 ·
Re: Should we adopt the KD8CEC firmware? By Mike Woods · #48931 ·
Re: boosting the power on 28 MHz #ubitx By K9HZ <bill@...> · #48930 ·
Re: Are the uBITX receivers ripe for improvement? -- And some other miscellaneous thoughts. By Raj vu2zap · #48929 ·
Re: Are the uBITX receivers ripe for improvement? -- And some other miscellaneous thoughts. By Ashhar Farhan · #48928 ·