|
Re: DISASTER !!
the diode on the bottom of the nano. near the usb conn. i put in a 1n400xs, fixes most of them. stinky
the diode on the bottom of the nano. near the usb conn. i put in a 1n400xs, fixes most of them. stinky
|
By
LKNDAVE
·
#48218
·
|
|
Re: boosting the power on 28 MHz
#ubitx
“However, the new PCB has pads for the RD16HHF1”
Thank you !!!!!!
Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ
Owner - Operator
Big Signal Ranch –
“However, the new PCB has pads for the RD16HHF1”
Thank you !!!!!!
Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ
Owner - Operator
Big Signal Ranch –
|
By
K9HZ <bill@...>
·
#48217
·
|
|
Re: ND6T AGC implementation for uBIT-X
Yes, you’ve got it. The Nyquist sampling theory sets the limit of resolving the Power (and hence SWR), and the A/D rate needs to be faster than that or it won’t work properly. For a 3 KHz signal
Yes, you’ve got it. The Nyquist sampling theory sets the limit of resolving the Power (and hence SWR), and the A/D rate needs to be faster than that or it won’t work properly. For a 3 KHz signal
|
By
K9HZ <bill@...>
·
#48216
·
|
|
Re: Using MPSA18 darlington in the driver?
#parts
#ubitx
Also have some MPSA13 coming in, those are the darlington, not the MPSA18, sorry about the confusion. Part number is pretty well the same except one number.
The 13 is what I meant to ask about using
Also have some MPSA13 coming in, those are the darlington, not the MPSA18, sorry about the confusion. Part number is pretty well the same except one number.
The 13 is what I meant to ask about using
|
By
Ghericoan
·
#48215
·
|
|
Re: Using MPSA18 darlington in the driver?
#parts
#ubitx
The hfe on these is typically 1150. Max is 1500, min is 500. I was curious as to if the higher gain might help with the drive on 30 meters and
The hfe on these is typically 1150. Max is 1500, min is 500. I was curious as to if the higher gain might help with the drive on 30 meters and
|
By
Ghericoan
·
#48214
·
|
|
Re: Using MPSA18 darlington in the driver?
#parts
#ubitx
my favorite to92 npn gain guy. bes
ide the xx390x twins the best transistor you can buy. tayda sells .12 each hfe ~400-500
my favorite to92 npn gain guy. bes
ide the xx390x twins the best transistor you can buy. tayda sells .12 each hfe ~400-500
|
By
LKNDAVE
·
#48213
·
|
|
Re: Need help understanding a line of code in ubitx_si5351.cpp (msxp2 = ...)
#radiuno
Thank you, Jerry - that helps guide me through the code and chip documentation (I was getting puzzled at doing all of these computations in unsigned 32-bit integer space with overflows and stuff to
Thank you, Jerry - that helps guide me through the code and chip documentation (I was getting puzzled at doing all of these computations in unsigned 32-bit integer space with overflows and stuff to
|
By
David Feldman
·
#48212
·
|
|
Re: boosting the power on 28 MHz
#ubitx
Yes, the plan was to use an RD device for the new version. We ran into availability issues. The lead time from Mitsuibishi was 10 weeks. So, I took a call to continue with the IRF510s. However, the
Yes, the plan was to use an RD device for the new version. We ran into availability issues. The lead time from Mitsuibishi was 10 weeks. So, I took a call to continue with the IRF510s. However, the
|
By
Ashhar Farhan
·
#48211
·
|
|
Re: boosting the power on 28 MHz
#ubitx
Ashar,
Is this mod going to be implemented on new production?
Thanks!
73 Steve
G1KQH
Ashar,
Is this mod going to be implemented on new production?
Thanks!
73 Steve
G1KQH
|
By
G1KQH
·
#48210
·
|
|
Re: No PTT
HI John & Jerry,
Now see other thread...
Geoff
HI John & Jerry,
Now see other thread...
Geoff
|
By
Geoff Theasby <geofftheasby@...>
·
#48209
·
|
|
Re: Removing nano from radiuno
#nano
#radiuno
#ubitx
Hi John, Jerry etc,
After stumbling about in the dark, I realised I had not entered Newline or 57600 baud as required. I ran it again and Lo!
1 gives "Equal inputs read by Arduino"
2 gives nothing
3
Hi John, Jerry etc,
After stumbling about in the dark, I realised I had not entered Newline or 57600 baud as required. I ran it again and Lo!
1 gives "Equal inputs read by Arduino"
2 gives nothing
3
|
By
Geoff Theasby <geofftheasby@...>
·
#48208
·
|
|
Re: 45Mhz crystal filter specification
Hi Tim,
I'm interested to know how your connecting your SA to the circuit, from my recollection the majority of SA equipment has a 50 ohm input impedance, an input impedance that low is not conducive
Hi Tim,
I'm interested to know how your connecting your SA to the circuit, from my recollection the majority of SA equipment has a 50 ohm input impedance, an input impedance that low is not conducive
|
By
freefuel@...
·
#48207
·
|
|
ubitx_20.ino does not compile, anybody else encounter this?
#ubitx-help
#ubitx
#arduino
#firmware
Has anyone else encountered a failure to compile the Arduino Sketch for the ubitx? I am getting an error code for some type of return in the menu portion of the code.
-Justin N2TOH
Has anyone else encountered a failure to compile the Arduino Sketch for the ubitx? I am getting an error code for some type of return in the menu portion of the code.
-Justin N2TOH
|
By
freefuel@...
·
#48206
·
|
|
Re: ND6T AGC implementation for uBIT-X
Arv…
Hmmm… we should probably take this off-line at this point. This has to do with A/D resolution time vs. filter time.
I’m rethinking…that diodes would be a better choice just
Arv…
Hmmm… we should probably take this off-line at this point. This has to do with A/D resolution time vs. filter time.
I’m rethinking…that diodes would be a better choice just
|
By
K9HZ <bill@...>
·
#48205
·
|
|
Re: boosting the power on 28 MHz
#ubitx
Thanks. This confirms what we tried two months ago.
Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ
Owner - Operator
Big Signal Ranch – K9ZC
Staunton,
Thanks. This confirms what we tried two months ago.
Dr. William J. Schmidt - K9HZ J68HZ 8P6HK ZF2HZ PJ4/K9HZ VP5/K9HZ PJ2/K9HZ
Owner - Operator
Big Signal Ranch – K9ZC
Staunton,
|
By
K9HZ <bill@...>
·
#48204
·
|
|
Re: boosting the power on 28 MHz
#ubitx
Jerry,
The outputs are as follows (from the log book):
3.5 MHz - 12W
7 MHz - 14W
10 MHz - 11W
14 MHz - 10W
21 MHz - 7.8W
28 MHz - 4.4W
(The preset was kept at maximum)
- f
Jerry,
The outputs are as follows (from the log book):
3.5 MHz - 12W
7 MHz - 14W
10 MHz - 11W
14 MHz - 10W
21 MHz - 7.8W
28 MHz - 4.4W
(The preset was kept at maximum)
- f
|
By
Ashhar Farhan
·
#48203
·
|
|
Re: ND6T AGC implementation for uBIT-X
Bill K9HZ
Not sure I follow your analysis. The added capacitance lowers upper frequency limit by a significant amount.
You can even go as high as 0.1 MFD so that the detector output is filtered to
Bill K9HZ
Not sure I follow your analysis. The added capacitance lowers upper frequency limit by a significant amount.
You can even go as high as 0.1 MFD so that the detector output is filtered to
|
By
Arv Evans
·
#48202
·
|
|
Re: boosting the power on 28 MHz
#ubitx
Very cool, thanks for digging into this.
I tried various schemes in LT-Spice, but improving the final is more
difficult than it seems going in.
I could seldom correctly predict the results I
Very cool, thanks for digging into this.
I tried various schemes in LT-Spice, but improving the final is more
difficult than it seems going in.
I could seldom correctly predict the results I
|
By
Jerry Gaffke
·
#48201
·
|
|
Re: boosting the power on 28 MHz
#ubitx
I forgot the picture of the experiment.
- f
I forgot the picture of the experiment.
- f
|
By
Ashhar Farhan
·
#48200
·
|
|
Re: boosting the power on 28 MHz
#ubitx
So, here are the final mods,
Replace C81 from 0.1uf to 470pf
Replace R83 from 10 ohms to 2.2 ohm
(you can short R83 as well)
Replace 97, R98 from 47 ohms to 220 ohms
Remove C261, C262.
So, what
So, here are the final mods,
Replace C81 from 0.1uf to 470pf
Replace R83 from 10 ohms to 2.2 ohm
(you can short R83 as well)
Replace 97, R98 from 47 ohms to 220 ohms
Remove C261, C262.
So, what
|
By
Ashhar Farhan
·
#48199
·
|