Re: Setting up a comprehensive station
Evan Hand
Gordon,
These are searches outside of the Groups.io site, not the message searches provided in the Groups.io search engine. I would have thought that would give better results pertinent to the uBiTx. The other thing to note is that you knew to search for Q90 protection, what if it is just a general search of protection of the radio form nearby transmitters? Just adding in the knowledge of Q90 is a significant piece of information that can be used to narrow down the search. As is typical on this board, the main topic as been hijacked to a general back and forth on some other aspect rather than the one the original qestioner was asking to help solve. I have said enough. Everyone else is right, I am wrong so I will shutdown. 73 Evan AC9TU
|
|
ramonlh@...
Hola,
estoy trabajando en la sustitución del Arduino Nano del uBitx v6 por un módulo con ESP32. Las principales ventajas que tiene este micro (https://www.espressif.com/en/products/socs/esp32/overview) - WiFi - Más RAM y velocidad - Permite el uso de ficheros. - Mayor número de GPIOs He partido del firmware original v6.3.1 y tomado parte del código de la versión 2 del firmware CEC (http://www.hamskey.com/2019/04/release-cec-firmware-v1200-for-ubitx.html) El único hardware necesario es un módulo ESP32 Dev kit de 2x15 pines (https://github.com/espressif/arduino-esp32/issues/544) y una placa PCB adaptadora para poder insertarlo en lugar del Arduino Nano. El prototipo está construido con una placa perforada y cableada. Aplicado al uBitx, tiene las siguientes ventajas: - La configuración se guarda en un fichero, sin los límites de la EEPROM. - Servidor web incluido - Servidor FTP - RTC - Segundo puerto serie. - Confuiguracion vía web. - Actualización del firmware vía web. - Incorporación de nuevas funciones por la mayor velocidad y tamaño de RAM. - Varias GPIOs disponibles para otros usos. Las funciones básicas ya están disponibles aquí https://github.com/ramonlh/ubitx32 Algunas imágenes : siento no poder escribirlo en inglés, llegué tarde a las clases en la escuela. Ramón EA4GZI
|
|
Re: Setting up a comprehensive station
Bill Cromwell
Hi Evan,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
There is never any call for flames in of forum, even the political forums. I know, I know, that doesn't seem to stop some. The causes are probably not simple and even if they are the solutions won't be. 73, Bill KU8H
On 4/30/20 5:16 PM, Evan Hand wrote:
All, --
bark less - wag more
|
|
Re: Setting up a comprehensive station
Gordon Gibby
Here’s a search where I didn’t presume knowledge of the fix:
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Apr 30, 2020, at 17:51, Gordon Gibby via groups.io <docvacuumtubes@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Setting up a comprehensive station
Gordon Gibby
I did a simple Google search, and came up with a whole slew of hits, several of which I wrote myself
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Apr 30, 2020, at 17:45, Thomas Sharka via groups.io <sharkatw@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Setting up a comprehensive station
brad martin
Same here. Just have my supply at 13.8 and never changed it on my v3
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 5:47 PM Joel Caulkins/N6ALT <caulktel@...> wrote: Chris, --
![]()
|
|
Re: Setting up a comprehensive station
Chris,
I operated that radio on 13.8 volts for a year and it didn't blow up, I'm sure it will be alright. Joel N6ALT
|
|
Re: Setting up a comprehensive station
Thomas Sharka
Have you tried using the "search sites" ability of Google? For example, "mail.yahoo.com: bitx" (no quotes) will return all hits on Yahoo mail that match bitx.
On Thursday, April 30, 2020, 05:16:41 PM EDT, Evan Hand <elhandjr@...> wrote:
All, I have done multiple searches on Groups.io. From that empirical data I have surmised that the text of the post is not being searched, only the title and hashtags. That is not really helpful unless everyone adds hashtags to the message title. I think that is too much to ask of the new user, and I do not know how to do so in a reply. Maybe we need "Potential Elmer" training as well Until I learn more, I will try to share what I think I know. I only ask that corrections be respectful and not flaming. 73 Evan AC9RU
|
|
Re: Setting up a comprehensive station
Evan Hand
All,
I have done multiple searches on Groups.io. From that empirical data I have surmised that the text of the post is not being searched, only the title and hashtags. That is not really helpful unless everyone adds hashtags to the message title. I think that is too much to ask of the new user, and I do not know how to do so in a reply. Maybe we need "Potential Elmer" training as well Until I learn more, I will try to share what I think I know. I only ask that corrections be respectful and not flaming. 73 Evan AC9RU
|
|
Re: Setting up a comprehensive station
Christopher Miller
Gordon, Knowing that this would come up I searched using the tools available and it didn’t work out. I’m getting a masters in cyber security so it’s not like I didn’t try. Chris
|
|
#v6
#v6
bilger.boyd@...
Built a V6. Worked well at first. After about 1 hour, while listening,
Resister R82 in emitter lead of 2N3904 failed. Section 1E of schematic. Trouble shooting? suggestions please. Boyd W9NUQ
|
|
Re: #ubitxv6
#ubitxv6
alfred.s@...
Thanks, I will try to figure out the measures from there. Thanks for the link!
|
|
Re: Setting up a comprehensive station
Robert D. Bowers
I do remember - I started driving in the early 70s, and one of the ones I learned to drive on was an old fifties GMC Coca-Cola truck. The headlights were wired so anytime the engine was running, they were on - for that very reason. (It was... interesting... to drive - three speed transaxle as I remember, plus 4 on the floor - and the synchromesh didn't work, if it had it in the first place. It took 5 minutes to get to 50 mph when fully loaded, double-clutching all the way!)
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I also used to have a couple of old inverter-driven power supplies for a couple of tube radios I once owned (back in the early 80s) - one with transistors, but the other with a buzzer. They were really rugged when it came to supply voltages! Most people today have never even heard of such a thing. (If it wasn't ruined, I also think I still have a rotary inverter - motor-generator type.) Talk about creative ways to go mobile! As far as a BitX goes... they do make buck/boost power supply modules that put out a few amps (adequate for the radio) - and I've seen ones that were adjustable. One I looked at (in a surplus store) could handle (as I remember) up to 60 volts or as low as 9, and put out a steady 13.4 volts - and a nice clean output at that. For a unreliable charging system, that would be the way to go! (Such a device wouldn't likely be that useful on a home power supply - they're usually well regulated and filtered!)
On 4/30/20 11:44 AM, Bill Cromwell wrote:
Hi Bob,
|
|
Re: Setting up a comprehensive station
Dave New, N8SBE
Don't know if you've ever been 'jumped' by a AAA truck, but it is common for them use 24V (!) to jump a dead vehicle. It is good practice to make sure any sensitive electronics (i.e. 'commercial' radios, chargers, etc) are unplugged before your vehicle is subjected to that kind of abuse. As far as the vehicle electronics go, they are typically designed for 50V 'load dump' voltage, which can happen if the main ground lead floats, or the vehicle battery is disconnected while the engine is running. What I don't understand is why commercial radio manufacturers tell everyone that if they exceed 14-16V or so, their radio may blow up. If it is designed as a mobile radio, that is just criminal. 73, -- DaveN
|
|
Re: VU2SPF - TFT_TouchScreen_for_uBitx -- CAT, Split, UP/Down Scan, V2.9BU Released with New User Manual
Joe
Yes it will plug into uno and atmega2560
|
|
Re: search engines on groups.io - was "Setting up a comprehensive station - newbie repeats"
I have found that the domain you search from can have a big impact on the results of a search Absolutely correct. I quit using Google about a year ago, switching to DuckDuckGo instead. I can't see that I'm missing a thing, other than Google's filtering the responses to suit their view of the world. Also, if you are looking for something where the information is likely to be useful and correct, you eventually learn that some sites are much better than others. For example, if I search for "C pointers to functions" and I see an entry by stackoverflow.com, I'll likely read that before the others, mainly because I like how they answer stuff. Others will likely find other contributors who "fit" their needs better. A little "searching practice" will give you a feel for your preferences. Jack, W8TEE
On Thursday, April 30, 2020, 11:10:43 AM EDT, Robert D. Bowers <n4fbz@...> wrote:
I too have noticed the problems with search, but it covers just
about every search engine. For instance on Google - I'll look for a
specific topic (related to research) - and either get nothing, or
hundreds of ads (maybe with information thrown in somewhere - often
several pages of search results deep). I know the information is
'out there' - but sometimes it takes hours to find - and I waste a
lot of time trying different combinations and patterns of search
terms. The problem is that search engines today are generally
crafted to support ads, not information (unlike the origin of the
internet) - and they cater to the lowest common denominator. Their
algorithms don't work very well when dealing with more technical
terms or specialized topics - unless they're specifically made to do
so. Off-topic results - doesn't seem to have any impact as far as I've noticed. Maybe there will be multiple hits on a single thread - but that happens even with a strictly 'on-topic' thread. (I've also seen that battle cry used to stifle free speech or 'friendly chatting' - even that related to the topic being discussed. A few times over the years I had that accusation thrown at me - for telling a 'war story' directly related to the topic of the thread or similar.) A funny thing I noted on the last time I tried to get information (changing an old BitX20 to 10 meters) - I could get more hits on Google than on the groups.io search. Lots of ads, of course - but a tad more information was found. I still had to ask the group and did get some useful pointers, but nothing more-or-less cookbook, which would have made the conversion project relaxing rather than stressful. (The radio is still on the shelf, waiting on funds and that precious commodity - time.) A better search engine could also eliminate a lot of the "here's some links, start reading - YOU GOTTA LEARN!!!" BS I see a lot, especially in Ham Radio (also other forms of insult thrown at people - especially newbies and people who don't buy the "latest and greatest"). The writers who love those kind of responses don't even begin to realize how offensive and jerk-ish they sound. (I don't ask them to learn what I have to (which would probably give them splitting headaches!), and it's doubly offensive to someone who has to read the equivalent of two or three technical books a day. I try to do ham radio to relax, not educate myself - which goes hand in hand with the work I do!) I have found that the domain you search from can have a big impact on the results of a search (but I haven't tried this with groups.io - maybe I should). If I use VPN to go through my school for searches, I get less ads (but sometimes less results too). If I use remote access to my work computer at school... I get a third set of results (but am forced to work with W10 which I despise). That points to the algorithms used to generate results. A colleague (programmer) and I chatted about this topic - and he said that the big search engines DO take into account where a search is coming from in the algorithms (IMO they probably throw ads when it's a private system at a residence, regardless of the terms used - trying to convince people to buy things they don't want). He did also say that their focus was more business-oriented. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that the search engine at groups.io is based on one of the 'big' ones, like google (I haven't checked). Maybe some programmer would be interested (if it could be set up with groups.io) in crafting a more specialized search engine for the amateur radio groups? That could make a huge difference for several groups. Bob N4FBZ On 4/30/20 9:10 AM, Bill Cromwell
wrote:
Hi, -- Jack, W8TEE
|
|
Re: VU2SPF - TFT_TouchScreen_for_uBitx -- CAT, Split, UP/Down Scan, V2.9BU Released with New User Manual
If the display shown at the bottom of the post is the ATmega2560 display, a dollar to a doughnut it will plug directly into an Uno. Jack, W8TEE
On Thursday, April 30, 2020, 11:11:14 AM EDT, Joe <joeman2116@...> wrote:
The display as Jack mention is not the type used for our project The tft displays we use plug directly into the atmega 2560 See picture of display rear: Joe VE1BWV
-- Jack, W8TEE
|
|
Re: Setting up a comprehensive station
Bill Cromwell
Hi Bob,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I don't know how far back you go but before solid state electronic regulation was introduced in automotive systems the charging voltage was commonly as high as 15 volts. Batteries and light bulbs start showing some stress at that point. Drivers would operate the headlights during day time, not for added safety, but to draw that charging voltage down to more conservative levels. 73, Bill KU8H
On 4/30/20 11:26 AM, Robert D. Bowers wrote:
Regarding setting up the station - if the radio is built for "12 volts" - only an _incompetent_ designer would make it so that the incoming voltage is absolutely no more than 10% above that voltage and wouldn't provide an adequate safety factor. As a lot of people already know, 12v is a generic term for a lead-acid battery with a specific number of cells - the 'resting' voltage will be above 12.8 volts depending on the charge state, and the charging voltage above 13.2 (usually 13.4-13.8 - I've seen 14 volts but that's a bit high IMO). Also the difference between 4 watts out and 5 watts out will not be detectable to a listener - and the range difference isn't much. To be barely noticeable to a listener, the power would have to be at least doubled (3db gain). --
bark less - wag more
|
|
Re: search engines on groups.io - was "Setting up a comprehensive station - newbie repeats"
Bill Cromwell
Hi Bob,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
You have expanded nicely on what I said. People, especially newbies, wouldn't be asking questions here if they already knew the answer or could find with search:) A comment (off topic) at the end of a post in another list netted me a nice private exchange with another musician on the other side of the continent :) 73, Bill KU8H
On 4/30/20 11:10 AM, Robert D. Bowers wrote:
I too have noticed the problems with search, but it covers just about every search engine. For instance on Google - I'll look for a specific topic (related to research) - and either get nothing, or hundreds of ads (maybe with information thrown in somewhere - often several pages of search results deep). I know the information is 'out there' - but sometimes it takes hours to find - and I waste a lot of time trying different combinations and patterns of search terms. The problem is that search engines today are generally crafted to support ads, not information (unlike the origin of the internet) - and they cater to the lowest common denominator. Their algorithms don't work very well when dealing with more technical terms or specialized topics - unless they're specifically made to do so. --
bark less - wag more
|
|
Re: Setting up a comprehensive station
Robert D. Bowers
Regarding setting up the station - if the radio is built for "12
volts" - only an incompetent designer would make it so that
the incoming voltage is absolutely no more than 10% above that
voltage and wouldn't provide an adequate safety factor. As a lot of
people already know, 12v is a generic term for a lead-acid battery
with a specific number of cells - the 'resting' voltage will be
above 12.8 volts depending on the charge state, and the charging
voltage above 13.2 (usually 13.4-13.8 - I've seen 14 volts but
that's a bit high IMO). Also the difference between 4 watts out and
5 watts out will not be detectable to a listener - and the range
difference isn't much. To be barely noticeable to a listener, the
power would have to be at least doubled (3db gain).
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Conditions are far more important than station wattage out. (A decent antenna is also critical - the better the antenna, the better you'll 'get out' and 'hear'.) As far as a BitX radio - I've run mine on 13.4 quite often, and my portable BitX40 station has a 12v lead-acid (sealed type) which varies from 12.8 to 13.4 depending on the charge state - also no problems. I've had one running in the van with a charging voltage over 14 volts - I didn't like it (battery was going bad), but again no problems. (Too much ignition noise in the van to use a BitX there - long story.) A commercially built rig from a 'big-name' company should be even more tolerant of voltage - although getting below 12v can cause real problems and usually isn't recommended, unless they specifically designed the radio to have a wide voltage range! The big things to be careful out is a proper match to the antenna (not for more efficient transfer of energy as much as a mismatch will stress the finals), the radio is properly adjusted, and the conditions are at least moderate. I'd also add good air movement around the radio - keeping it cool. Enjoy your station! Bob N4FBZ
On 4/29/20 2:52 AM, Christopher Miller
wrote:
|
|