Re: KD8CEC Firmware
Charlie :
You will need to add the two additional resistors if you want to use paddles on CW with the KD8CEC firmware. Also you would require a hardware mod for the S-meter functionality on the 2.8" display to work. Other features like IF-Shift and ATT don't require any additional mods to rig. I will let you know if there is anything else. Saturday is Field Day here in NA so I will busy, but I hope to get my new display up and running on Sunday. Cheers Michael VE3WMB
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Re: ND6T AGC and Click kit wiring notes
Mark M
Hmmm...I've had some issues with mine. I wonder if I may have reverse powered it before I realized the pad by the 5V marking was ground. I don't imagine that would be good for it.
I guess I could build the second one I have & see if it makes any difference. Or maybe just replace the transistors. Mark AA7TA
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Re: experience with Sunil VU3SUA's enclosures
#ubitx
allen west
My only complaint about the case is there are no bare spots for grounding. Also no star washers for grounding. Apparently case ground was not an issue.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I really do like the looks and sturdiness. Al KB4RA
On Jun 22, 2018, at 8:53 PM, Mark M <junquemaile@...> wrote:
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Re: Nextion Displays >> warning
I followed Joe's (VE1BWV) lead and checked out Robotshop.ca and found the 2.8" display for about $25 CAN.
This is a pretty reasonable deal and it showed up in a couple of days. We will see how long it takes for the 2.8" display that I had previously ordered on eBay (coming from China) takes to show up ! Michael VE3WMB
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Re: Understanding Spurious Emissions
Tim Gorman
If all I need is to use the ubitx as a 28Mhz IF for a 2m transverter
then all I need is a 28mhz high-pass, correct? I would think that it would be easy enough to build a high-pass in order to kill the 16mhz-17mhz spur. Perhaps build it into the transverter itself. Any recommendations? tim ab0wr On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 18:02:01 -0700 "ajparent1/KB1GMX" <kb1gmx@...> wrote: If we use round numbers...
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Re: Understanding Spurious Emissions
Jerry Gaffke
Table two of the arrl.org filter reference shows that the 21 mhz bandpass filter
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
has 15db of attenuation at 28mhz, that's 7mhz away. We need something like 20 dB of attenuation at 2mhz away. As Allison says, that's a tough nut to crack. And I have my doubts about the filter I pointed to. Jerry
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 04:31 pm, Gordon Gibby wrote: Forgot to put the link.
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Re: Understanding Spurious Emissions
Jerry Gaffke
I'd recommend you check to see if the transverter takes care of the spur for you.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
At 28mhz, the spur is at 45-28=17mhz going in, and something around 30 dB down from your 28mhz signal. The transverter likely does all the filtering you need already. If you need additional filtering, a 28mhz highpass would do it. Jerry
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 06:19 pm, Tim Gorman wrote: If all I need is to use the ubitx as a 28Mhz IF for a 2m transverter
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
measuring spurious signals
Arv Evans
The various BITX transceivers present an interesting and educational opportunity to determine the accuracy of our test equipment, test procedures, and interpretation of all the above. http://www.rfwireless-world.com/Tutorials/rf-measurements-tutorial.html http://www.microwavejournal.com/articles/28317-proper-measurement-of-mixer-spurious-content http://tinyurl.com/ya5jwqj4 http://tinyurl.com/y865qnb4 http://tinyurl.com/y7p9j3um It seems imperative that the test gear be configured and verified that measurements are accurate and reflect just the contribution from the DUT, and not something from test equipment. Attenuators and filters are necessary to insure that we are measuring what we think we are measuring. Arv _._
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Re: Understanding Spurious Emissions
William Kimber
On 21Mhz rather than a band pass/high/low filter what about 23mhz
trap(s) also called notch filter. Even high Q should be wide
enough to cover whole 23.8 to 23.55Mhz. Similar for 24Mhz
needs to cover 20.17 to 20.01Mhz
Cheers, Will ZL1TAO
On 23/06/18 13:33, Jerry Gaffke via
Groups.Io wrote:
Table two of the arrl.org filter reference shows that the 21 mhz bandpass filter
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Re: Understanding Spurious Emissions
Ashhar Farhan
I am not sure if 28 mhz is a problem. I am travelling so I will go back and check. I switched to 4 filters to be fcc compliant from 3.5 mhz to 28 mhz. - f
On Sat, 23 Jun 2018, 07:16 William Kimber, <zl1tao@...> wrote:
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Re: Homebrew from scratch
#ubitx
Beautiful! Jack, W8TEE
On Friday, June 22, 2018, 1:50:24 PM EDT, Peter Carr <radio@...> wrote:
I have just built a uBITX with standard components (no SMD's) from scratch on a PCB I designed - it works well. I have now designed another PCB which incorporates the Arduino NANO and the the Si5351 shield and I'm just waiting for the PCB's to arrive and then I will start assembling. I made some changes to the circuit to allow for a dynamic microphone and the use of screened TOKO cols for the 30MHz lowpass filter, I also changed the coupling arrangement to the 45MHz filter. I have attached a picture of the original PCB and a PDF of the new layout incorporating the Arduino and Si5351 Maybe one day I will play with SMT but for now standard components are still easily available ! 73's - Peter M0HYT
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Re: W8TEE Power/SWR Sketch for Nano
Spend a weekend with a Nano, the OLED, and a breadboard and the example code and you'll have it working in less than a week even if you don't know programming. If I had JackAl tucked away in bed, I'd jump in and help, but I need to finish this up first. Meanwhile, Google "Arduino Nano OLED Projects" and see what pops up. The code is really simple...check the entries out, like:
Jack, W8TEE
On Friday, June 22, 2018, 1:12:20 PM EDT, Kees T <windy10605@...> wrote:
That's the one. We're putting together a 25mW to 25W Power SWR meter (.....like who isn't) and have a great bidirectional coupler, the AD8307s, some Op-Amps as needed for level control and calibration, a Nano, and several of those displays. Makes a nice combination for a uBITX. The only thing I lack is the firmware. We have use those OLEDs in a couple of devices and (if they don't generate too much interference) look very nice and super sharp....FWD, REV, VSWR, ? Could also drive it with one of the many signal generators out there to allow a low level antenna "Tune" function for the attached Transceiver. We also have a LED bargraph version which requires NO firmware ....but it's only $2-3 less and lacks being as user friendly. You guys who write the firmware control the road. 73 Kees K5BCQ
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Re: Homebrew from scratch
#ubitx
Very neat Peter!
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
At 22/06/2018, you wrote:
I have just built a uBITX with standard components (no SMD's) from scratch on a PCB I designed - it works well. I have now designed another PCB which incorporates the Arduino NANO and the the Si5351 shield and I'm just waiting for the PCB's to arrive and then I will start assembling. I made some changes to the circuit to allow for a dynamic microphone and the use of screened TOKO cols for the 30MHz lowpass filter, I also changed the coupling arrangement to the 45MHz filter.
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Heat sink
VE7CWS WRSeiler <waltrseiler@...>
Hello fellow constructors
I have been thinking about using a common heat sink for the RF power transistors, insulated with mica washers of course and insulated mounting hardware. Would there be inter capacitance issues or some other anomaly. Any thoughts or experience based observations? cheers and 73 Walt R VE7CWS
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Re: Understanding Spurious Emissions
Jerry Gaffke
The four transmit filters we have are all low pass filters.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
The spur Allison found is below the operating frequency, so those filters don't touch it. When operating at 28mhz, the spur is at 45mhz - 28mhz = 17mhz As I understand it, what's happening is the mixer at T1,T2 works as you might expect, with the 45mhz IF being converted to 28 mhz by a 45+28 = 73 mhz VFO from clk2. But a little bit of that outgoing 28 mhz energy finds its way back into the mixer. On this second time through it mixes again with the 45mhz IF and we get 45-28 = 17mhz. There are plenty of other products like this, but this is the only strong one that's low enough to get through the 30mhz LPF at L1,2,3,4. This is not a fault in the way the bat54s mixers are built. It's just the nature of diode ring mixers, and Allison has found that she gets the same spur when using commercial mixers while carefully controlling impedances at all ports. Jerry
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 07:52 pm, Ashhar Farhan wrote:
I am not sure if 28 mhz is a problem. I am travelling so I will go back and check. I switched to 4 filters to be fcc compliant from 3.5 mhz to 28 mhz.
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Re: Heat sink
Jerry Gaffke
I believe that should work fine.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Given the significant power and the relatively low voltages, the impedance at the drain is quite low. A little bit of extra capacitive coupling is not too disruptive.
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 09:17 pm, VE7CWS WRSeiler wrote:
I have been thinking about using a common heat sink for the RF power transistors, insulated with mica washers of course and insulated mounting hardware. Would there be inter capacitance issues or some other anomaly. Any thoughts or experience based
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Re: experience with Sunil VU3SUA's enclosures
#ubitx
Mike KK7ER
Thanks, everyone, for the comments. It is great information. Looks like I need to wait a little longer.
73 Mike KK7ER
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Re: Blown (socketed) TDA2822?
You missed my point Jerry. I am not suggesting 2822D. Please see
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
the spec sheet I attached. It is a lower power version of tda2822. I think that die is being repackaged as TDA2822 in 8 pin DIP. It cannot take the load and blows up. Raj
At 22/06/2018, you wrote: Summary: All is well, unless you have a WX branded TDA2822.
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Re: Blown (socketed) TDA2822?
Jerry Gaffke
You think the WX might be a repackaged TA2822D meant for the SOIC8?
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I doubt it. I think the WX is a cheap copy that simply doesn't meet the 15v absolute max spec We had reports that there are clones of the TDA2822 (not necessarily the WX) that blow when given a supply over 7 or 8 volts. (Some club project in England) Didn't have to be putting out significant power to blow. As I recall, some of the WX failures happened instantly, and all struck me as consistent with too much voltage for it to handle. The SOIC datasheet you point to has the same 15v absolute max spec that the DIP part does. The primary differences I see between the SOIC and DIP datasheets from ST have to do with power dissipation, possible that ST was using the same die in both but the SOIC simply can't deal with the heat. Failure mode on the SOIC would be due to overheating under load and take a bit of time. I don't think that is what we were seeing with the WX. But I'm just guessing. Could be proven wrong. Jerry
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 09:59 pm, Raj vu2zap wrote:
You missed my point Jerry. I am not suggesting 2822D. Please see
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Re: Blown (socketed) TDA2822?
Jerry Gaffke
Would be interesting to pop the lids off the various TDA2822 parts,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
examine the die under a microscope. I'm betting the WX looks significantly different than an ST.
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 10:30 pm, Jerry Gaffke wrote: But I'm just guessing.
|
||||||||
|