toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Well, Mike, you obviously missed the point, so there's no reason to continue.
On Wednesday, October 16, 2019, 7:55:45 PM EDT, Michael Walker <va3mw@...> wrote:
This has nothing to do with Bitx... sorry
And, if you think it is, then I want to talk about my HF antenna that hooks up to my BITX.
Can we kill this and take it elsewhere as this is a world wide group and not all of us live in California or even the US.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 7:15 PM Ken Hansen <ken@...
When this topic came up here in Texas on the local ARRL section mail list/reflector, I encouraged everyone that is engaged in EmComm to take this opportunity to reach out to their serviced agencies and organizations and ensure everyone understand the needs and offerings of each, and that the current relationships are mutually beneficial. To me, that is the take-away from this story.
As a reminder, groups.io has a facility for 'muting' threads you are not interested in, for anyone not interested in following this, or any similar conversation. The way it works is you click on the mute link at the bottom of the message, and any subsequent replies to that email thread will not be sent to you. If someone decides to start a new thread on the same topic, you'll have to mute that thread as well to stop any responses to the new thread.
> On Oct 16, 2019, at 15:01, Jack, W8TEE via Groups.Io <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> If I were living in CA, I'd think this is a very BIG teapot. If I lived in OR or ID, I'd still see it as a huge teapot. From a legal precedent standpoint, I think all hams in any state who face similar leasing controls should be concerned, especially since the general public probably doesn't see or understand what's going on.
> Jack, W8TEE