It's ok to keep the conversation here. I'm sure there are others with D7s that could benefit or contribute. Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of APRSISCE for Windows Mobile and Win32

Thanks Lynn! I didn't get the radio to respond to PuTTY so have work to do. I'll save this list from non-APRSIS32 related chatter though. 73 Steve

Yes, that should be correct. I haven't personally tested the D7, but I suspect there are some out there using one with APRSIS32. One key would be to connect the cabling to the radio and

Hi everyone, I am looking to experiment with 9K6 APRS with a local friend of mine. As I have an unused Kenwood THD-7 this becomes the obvious choice for my (70cm) I-gate. (Im aware of its limitations

OK. I guess I should moderate the “likelihood “ of putting it in my Farm P/U truck. I wouldn’t say “never “.. Just that (A) no one cares where I am driving. And (B) there are usually two

Just in case, the callsign of the mobile MUST be different from the callsign of the receiving station because APRS ignores its own call. Bob

You’d mentioned this before. However I see it differently now that I have used the Com port output of my D710. And here is a quote from there too: By having APRSISCE/32 monitoring the COM port,

This should explain it better: Kenwood TM-D710 Port (APRS mode) - APRSISCE/32 The future of Amateur Radio APRS Kenwood TM-D710 Port (APRS mode) - APRSISCE/32 The future of Amateur Rad... APRSISCE/32

1:Fm N4PWH-10 To APDW15 Via KD7YZ-15,WIDE1*,WIDE2-1 <UI pid=F0 Len=57 >[08:40:46] !3819.85NI08258.30W#RasPi I-Gate/Digipeater in Grayson KY [UISS/AGWPE] or ( and I'd asked about this "not supported

Thanks for the great links. I bookmark’d them both -- KD7YZ Bob EM88LL

Yes, the packet originator comes first before the > Yes, the callsign after the q-construct (qAR in this case) is usually, but not always, the IGate.  You can read more about q Constructs

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WinMain:2019-12-28T15:36:33.513 RFtoIS:[AGWPE-TELNET ]IGated

The idea is to use a mono band 2 meter for dedicated APRS. Signal band 2 meter radio are pretty inexpensive. -- Jack L. Blake

I'm trying really hard not to comment on a WIDE1-1,WIDE3-3 path... And it was completely used! But I'm glad you're seeing the behavior you were wanting to accomplish. Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of

And here's the proof. so to speak: Port(AGWPE-TELNET ):2019-12-28T15:36:33.512 Read 116 bytes after 5122726 msec (up from 14) vs 0 Quiet Port(AGWPE-TELNET ):2019-12-28T15:36:33.513 AGW:AX.25-rPort[0]

Like any setup, cheap HTs tend to work well when everything is configured properly. Like most equipment, you need to look at its capability. As Fred said, "MOST" dual band radios (more likely with

The cheap Chinese dual bands tend to have a long turnaround time. That is they take several times longer (up to 7x) to go from tx to being able to rx. The few tests I’ve seen online show a lot less

How would one of the cheap Chinese HT connected to a outside antenna using a PS work? I would not want to tie up a high dollar dual band for APRS -- Jack L. Blake

The FT857 will not operate in that manner. Many of the dual band radios will not either. The 857 is single receive/transmit. The typical dual band is dual receive/single transmit. I tend to use older

. I "Think" I may be learning. looking at the Trace Log for the AGWPE-TelNet, I have --------------------------------------------------------------------- WinMain:2019-12-28T14:11:10.632 Starting