|
Re: Specific Paths for RFOnly.
It may be that Xastir is filtering the NOGATE before showing you the log of received packets. You need to be looking at the actual RF received traffic to know if you copied the digipeat.
It may be that Xastir is filtering the NOGATE before showing you the log of received packets. You need to be looking at the actual RF received traffic to know if you copied the digipeat.
|
By
Lynn Deffenbaugh
·
#35986
·
|
|
Re: Specific Paths for RFOnly.
Yes I'm running direwolf connected to an FT-857d connected to a full wave 2m ant on the top of a 55ft tower...I have internet turned off for this testing.
Dan W5DMH
Yes I'm running direwolf connected to an FT-857d connected to a full wave 2m ant on the top of a 55ft tower...I have internet turned off for this testing.
Dan W5DMH
|
By
Dan Hurd W5DMH
·
#35985
·
|
|
Re: Specific Paths for RFOnly.
NOGATE means that your packet will not be forwarded to the APRS-IS by compliant I-gates.
Do NOT look at aprs.fi or other APRS-IS feeds for your information. The APRS-IS feed is heavily filtered, so
NOGATE means that your packet will not be forwarded to the APRS-IS by compliant I-gates.
Do NOT look at aprs.fi or other APRS-IS feeds for your information. The APRS-IS feed is heavily filtered, so
|
By
James Ewen
·
#35984
·
|
|
Re: Specific Paths for RFOnly.
Maybe I am looking at success all wrong ....
I am first looking at the live traffic in Xastir to see if the first digi in my path string is receiving it and repeating it.
I am not seeing a repeat
Maybe I am looking at success all wrong ....
I am first looking at the live traffic in Xastir to see if the first digi in my path string is receiving it and repeating it.
I am not seeing a repeat
|
By
Dan Hurd W5DMH
·
#35983
·
|
|
Re: Specific Paths for RFOnly.
No I am putting it as the last entry at the end....typical path looks like:
MAYVIL,JAMTWP,K8FSU,NOGATE
Dan W5DMH
No I am putting it as the last entry at the end....typical path looks like:
MAYVIL,JAMTWP,K8FSU,NOGATE
Dan W5DMH
|
By
Dan Hurd W5DMH
·
#35982
·
|
|
Re: Specific Paths for RFOnly.
The reason is not so lofty....my buddy has a digi/igate at his location however he is in an area that routinely loses internet and only has one wide digi that can reach him (and that is questionable)
The reason is not so lofty....my buddy has a digi/igate at his location however he is in an area that routinely loses internet and only has one wide digi that can reach him (and that is questionable)
|
By
Dan Hurd W5DMH
·
#35981
·
|
|
Re: Specific Paths for RFOnly.
Dan,
Where are you putting NOGATE in your outbound path?
Put it at the end. I suspect you have it as the first hop.
Digipeaters look at the first unused hop request. If NOGATE is the first hop
Dan,
Where are you putting NOGATE in your outbound path?
Put it at the end. I suspect you have it as the first hop.
Digipeaters look at the first unused hop request. If NOGATE is the first hop
|
By
James Ewen
·
#35980
·
|
|
Re: Specific Paths for RFOnly.
Rob,
You can be sure of the path taken by observing the used path elements in the received packet.
Of course this means actually looking at the packets received, but if Dan is interested in
Rob,
You can be sure of the path taken by observing the used path elements in the received packet.
Of course this means actually looking at the packets received, but if Dan is interested in
|
By
James Ewen
·
#35979
·
|
|
Re: Specific Paths for RFOnly.
I'm struggling with this....NOGATE seems to cause the digi to ignore the packet
When I remove NOGATE, even though I have a specified path, the local digi will repeat it anyway
I tried RFONLY too and
I'm struggling with this....NOGATE seems to cause the digi to ignore the packet
When I remove NOGATE, even though I have a specified path, the local digi will repeat it anyway
I tried RFONLY too and
|
By
Dan Hurd W5DMH
·
#35978
·
|
|
Re: Specific Paths for RFOnly
Dan,
Like Rob said, if your buddy can hear the third digi, don’t put more path elements in the outbound path. You have a specific station you are aiming to contact, so there is no need to flood an
Dan,
Like Rob said, if your buddy can hear the third digi, don’t put more path elements in the outbound path. You have a specific station you are aiming to contact, so there is no need to flood an
|
By
James Ewen
·
#35977
·
|
|
Re: Specific Paths for RFOnly.
Probably a good idea, if you want it to be RF only.
Otherwise, you can't be sure.
Rob KB8RCO
Probably a good idea, if you want it to be RF only.
Otherwise, you can't be sure.
Rob KB8RCO
|
By
Rob Giuliano
·
#35976
·
|
|
Re: Specific Paths for RFOnly
Should I have NOGATE in my path to insure it doesn't get gated at the first DIGI ? (These are big wide area digi's that all igate also)
Dan W5DMH
Should I have NOGATE in my path to insure it doesn't get gated at the first DIGI ? (These are big wide area digi's that all igate also)
Dan W5DMH
|
By
Dan Hurd W5DMH
·
#35975
·
|
|
Re: Specific Paths for RFOnly
If you reach your destination aftrr K8FSU, you don't need any more path elements - WIDE2-1 will only add to RF.
Now the catch. If any of those stations don't DIGI your packet, it fails. Including
If you reach your destination aftrr K8FSU, you don't need any more path elements - WIDE2-1 will only add to RF.
Now the catch. If any of those stations don't DIGI your packet, it fails. Including
|
By
Rob Giuliano
·
#35974
·
|
|
Re: Specific Paths for RFOnly
So I have MAYVIL close to me and I know MAYVIL can reach JAMTWP and I know JAMTWP can reach K8FSU and I know K8FSU can reach my buddy KE8OHG
So my path should be simply "MAYVIL,JAMTWP, K8FSU,
So I have MAYVIL close to me and I know MAYVIL can reach JAMTWP and I know JAMTWP can reach K8FSU and I know K8FSU can reach my buddy KE8OHG
So my path should be simply "MAYVIL,JAMTWP, K8FSU,
|
By
Dan Hurd W5DMH
·
#35973
·
|
|
Re: Specific Paths for RFOnly
Morning Dan,
Yes it will.
you can also do it for specific objects.
Keep in mind that any station that can hear one of the stations in that path will hear it, but it should only be repeated by the
Morning Dan,
Yes it will.
you can also do it for specific objects.
Keep in mind that any station that can hear one of the stations in that path will hear it, but it should only be repeated by the
|
By
Adam Mahnke
·
#35972
·
|
|
Re: Specific Paths for RFOnly
Yes I know where to set the path, the question is will it work if I put specific digi names in the path?
73 Dan W5DMH
Yes I know where to set the path, the question is will it work if I put specific digi names in the path?
73 Dan W5DMH
|
By
Dan Hurd W5DMH
·
#35971
·
|
|
Re: Specific Paths for RFOnly
Configure / Beacon / Path...
Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of APRSISCE for Windows Mobile and Win32
On 1/7/2022 7:41 AM, Dan Hurd wrote:
Configure / Beacon / Path...
Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of APRSISCE for Windows Mobile and Win32
On 1/7/2022 7:41 AM, Dan Hurd wrote:
|
By
Lynn Deffenbaugh
·
#35970
·
|
|
Specific Paths for RFOnly
This might be a little off topic.
I am in an area that has several Wide area Digi/Igate stations.
I am trying to reach a station via RF only that would probably take 5 hops if the right digi's wer
This might be a little off topic.
I am in an area that has several Wide area Digi/Igate stations.
I am trying to reach a station via RF only that would probably take 5 hops if the right digi's wer
|
By
Dan Hurd W5DMH
·
#35969
·
|
|
Re: No GPS on Yaesu FTM 400
Re: “GPS and windows are a bugger…”
Probably not really a Windows problem at all, but, rather, one of being able to survive the 19.5 year GPS rollovers. I had an old Pharos 360 gps that came
Re: “GPS and windows are a bugger…”
Probably not really a Windows problem at all, but, rather, one of being able to survive the 19.5 year GPS rollovers. I had an old Pharos 360 gps that came
|
By
Mark, KE6BB
·
#35968
·
|
|
Re: No GPS on Yaesu FTM 400
GPS and windows are a bugger, I have an OLD Bluetooth USB receiver
that I used with Microsoft Mappoint in the 2000s. It is nearly useless
indoors, (my six-year-old android phones are way better) but
GPS and windows are a bugger, I have an OLD Bluetooth USB receiver
that I used with Microsoft Mappoint in the 2000s. It is nearly useless
indoors, (my six-year-old android phones are way better) but
|
By
Dexter Mobley
·
#35967
·
|