|
Re: Lightning data
Um, so I'm running one instance of APRSIS32, and have both IS and Firenet ports defined. But the Firenet port doesn't have Transmit enabled, nor any of the iGate check boxes (RF to IS or IS to
Um, so I'm running one instance of APRSIS32, and have both IS and Firenet ports defined. But the Firenet port doesn't have Transmit enabled, nor any of the iGate check boxes (RF to IS or IS to
|
By
Greg D
·
#34281
·
|
|
Re: Lightning data (was: Ready for Release?)
Re: “Note that you should NOT connect an IGate to firenet. “
My mind just isn’t what it used to be. You just reminded me WHY I started running separate instances, one for Amateur Radio
Re: “Note that you should NOT connect an IGate to firenet. “
My mind just isn’t what it used to be. You just reminded me WHY I started running separate instances, one for Amateur Radio
|
By
Mark, KE6BB
·
#34280
·
|
|
Re: Lightning data
If you own a receiver, you have access to their raw data. I wrote an APRSISMO extension that polls this data, massages it, converts it to APRS packets, and injects them into firenet on a
If you own a receiver, you have access to their raw data. I wrote an APRSISMO extension that polls this data, massages it, converts it to APRS packets, and injects them into firenet on a
|
By
Lynn Deffenbaugh
·
#34279
·
|
|
Re: Lightning data (was: Ready for Release?)
How are you pulling the lightning strike data from Blitzortung? I have one of their recievers but am just getting it on the air now...
p
How are you pulling the lightning strike data from Blitzortung? I have one of their recievers but am just getting it on the air now...
p
|
By
Patrick Wood
·
#34278
·
|
|
Lightning data (was: Ready for Release?)
b/KJ4ERJ-15 will get you my flying satellites as will o/ISS*/PSAT* (the * is required as they have trailing spaces. This should work on both APRS-IS and firenet.
b/KJ4ERJ-LS will
b/KJ4ERJ-15 will get you my flying satellites as will o/ISS*/PSAT* (the * is required as they have trailing spaces. This should work on both APRS-IS and firenet.
b/KJ4ERJ-LS will
|
By
Lynn Deffenbaugh
·
#34277
·
|
|
Re: Ready for Release?
Thanks for the reminder, Fred. I had forgotten about Lynns lightning server. I noticed that I had -b/KJ4ERJ-LS in my filters which I changed to b/KJ4ERJ-LS, and it works! Now I remember that I used
Thanks for the reminder, Fred. I had forgotten about Lynns lightning server. I noticed that I had -b/KJ4ERJ-LS in my filters which I changed to b/KJ4ERJ-LS, and it works! Now I remember that I used
|
By
Mark, KE6BB
·
#34276
·
|
|
Re: Ready for Release?
I do almost the same thing. I also display earthquakes and lightning!
Best regards,
Fred N7FMH
PS. Release it! It is ready!
I do almost the same thing. I also display earthquakes and lightning!
Best regards,
Fred N7FMH
PS. Release it! It is ready!
|
By
Fred Hillhouse
·
#34275
·
|
|
Re: Ready for Release?
If your asking if it's ready for prime time, I'm running the 4/27 16:06 version and while I've not exercised everything, nothing has acted buggy.
Only problem I'm chasing is KPC3 KISS status upon
If your asking if it's ready for prime time, I'm running the 4/27 16:06 version and while I've not exercised everything, nothing has acted buggy.
Only problem I'm chasing is KPC3 KISS status upon
|
By
Tony G
·
#34274
·
|
|
Re: Ready for Release?
Working well for me, I'd say yes.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Working well for me, I'd say yes.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
|
By
Randy Allen
·
#34273
·
|
|
Re: Ready for Release?
Send it, two instances stable 24/7. Both Digi, one is-rf igate, one on firenet.
Adam
KC2ANT
Get Outlook for Android
Send it, two instances stable 24/7. Both Digi, one is-rf igate, one on firenet.
Adam
KC2ANT
Get Outlook for Android
|
By
Adam Mahnke <kc2ant@...>
·
#34272
·
|
|
Re: Ready for Release?
Long overdue
73
Steve, kf6wax
Long overdue
73
Steve, kf6wax
|
By
Steve
·
#34271
·
|
|
Re: Ready for Release?
Oops. Just upgraded... I was waiting for things to stabilize; guess I
waited too long.
Seems to be working. This is under Wine on a Linux box.
Greg KO6TH
Lynn Deffenbaugh wrote:
Oops. Just upgraded... I was waiting for things to stabilize; guess I
waited too long.
Seems to be working. This is under Wine on a Linux box.
Greg KO6TH
Lynn Deffenbaugh wrote:
|
By
Greg D
·
#34270
·
|
|
Re: Ready for Release?
Yes, and for now that feature (filtered -IS to RF gating) will remain only enabled with Development in the XML config file. Until I can get some sort of throttling implemented, I don't want
Yes, and for now that feature (filtered -IS to RF gating) will remain only enabled with Development in the XML config file. Until I can get some sort of throttling implemented, I don't want
|
By
Lynn Deffenbaugh
·
#34269
·
|
|
Re: Ready for Release?
Been running for awhile, but gaven't been able to test any of ghe new features.
Q: Was the IS to RF filtering included as was in development?
Sorry I didn't check the update list, but was
Been running for awhile, but gaven't been able to test any of ghe new features.
Q: Was the IS to RF filtering included as was in development?
Sorry I didn't check the update list, but was
|
By
Rob Giuliano
·
#34268
·
|
|
Re: Ready for Release?
I say go for it. I haven't encountered any issues with the update.
Billy Mason
KD5KNR
I say go for it. I haven't encountered any issues with the update.
Billy Mason
KD5KNR
|
By
Billy Mason
·
#34267
·
|
|
Re: Ready for Release?
Yes! I've had 2 instances running most of the day...One for "normal" APRS traffic (RF & IS), and a second one for NWS traffic on firenet for weather (tornado) watching. No problems so far.
I love the
Yes! I've had 2 instances running most of the day...One for "normal" APRS traffic (RF & IS), and a second one for NWS traffic on firenet for weather (tornado) watching. No problems so far.
I love the
|
By
Mark, KE6BB
·
#34266
·
|
|
Re: Ready for Release?
Latest latest or the one before the last 2 updates? I think the one before the last 2 was stable. Don't know with the updates as they've only been running for a couple days.
Greg KB3KBR Sent from my
Latest latest or the one before the last 2 updates? I think the one before the last 2 was stable. Don't know with the updates as they've only been running for a couple days.
Greg KB3KBR Sent from my
|
By
Greg Depew
·
#34265
·
|
|
Ready for Release?
So, according to the second ("Upgrades") telemetry graph for KJ4ERJ at aprs.fi, it appears that the upgrades are slowing down. So the $20,000 question is: For those of you running the latest
So, according to the second ("Upgrades") telemetry graph for KJ4ERJ at aprs.fi, it appears that the upgrades are slowing down. So the $20,000 question is: For those of you running the latest
|
By
Lynn Deffenbaugh
·
#34264
·
|
|
Re: Other type Packets
Those are the packets generated by your IGate and are only indirectly related to the gating activity.
You have Configure / Status enabled with Timestamp checked but not
Those are the packets generated by your IGate and are only indirectly related to the gating activity.
You have Configure / Status enabled with Timestamp checked but not
|
By
Lynn Deffenbaugh
·
#34263
·
|
|
Re: Other type Packets
APRSIS32 will pass all received packets to the APRS-IS unless you've tweaked the default configuration.
Look for and enable any/all IGate* trace logs and you'll see the
APRSIS32 will pass all received packets to the APRS-IS unless you've tweaked the default configuration.
Look for and enable any/all IGate* trace logs and you'll see the
|
By
Lynn Deffenbaugh
·
#34262
·
|