There is too much for anyone to read except small parts. They use computers to go over it. Garbage in garbage out is what computer programmers like to say. The results you get depends a lot on your

Of course I can't read DNA code. But I have no doubt that others can, and I am trying to learn about it, as genetics is something I am very weak on. Here is a great web site that I am studying

Before people chipped stone tools populations would have been low, especially in environments likely to preserve fossils. It also may be they did not live in caves. Beach caves get worn away unless

Fire -- 400,000 years. Burials -- 100,000 years. If you wanted to know, you'd Google it. If, like all other stalkers you just crave attention, try joining a club, since you don't seem to have

As I read this article, which mentions human bodies that were buried a long time ago (8,000 years) it gets me to think about the striking lack of early human burial sites. AAT can help explain this:

“In addition note the length of the ischium in Homo compared with Pan . Like chimpanzees, theischium in Ar. ramidus is relatively long, indicating a potential mosaic evolution of the pelvis in

This is not a DNA-problem. No. Nothing is a problem for people who don't read the information past the first paragraph.. But the A00 gene has nothing to do with the human/chimp split. Again, not a

On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 02:16 AM, Gareth Morgan wrote: Here's just one example: - https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/06/a-reasonable-doubt/480747/In your example, Texas police misread

Morphological description and evolutionary significance of 300 ka hominin facial bones from Hualongdong, China Dec.2021 Journal of Human Evolution 161:103052 xiu jie Wu Shuwen Pei Yanjun Cai Wu

viral DNA....can give an accurate measure Excellent. So genetics proves (via CERV2) that the human/chimp split happened 23 million years ago. also... Genetics proves (via A00 gene) that the

All, This is an great paper. What it is basically proves is the viral DNA is important and is highly conserved. That means endogenous viruses don’t change like protein coding genes and can give an

How often is DNA evidence wrong? Last year, the bureau admitted that it had reviewed testimony by its microscopic-hair-comparison analysts and found errors in at least 90 percent of the

DNA is like reading a book, where the text is actually legible. Anyone able to read, reads the same thing. Ha ha ha ha ha!... Go on then. Enlighten us. What does this say? From: AAT@groups.io

On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 08:29 PM, alandarwinvanarsdale wrote: Human geneticists learned about Out of Africa and made their data fit the Recent Out of Africa hypothesis by elevating the hypothesis to

No fossil or genetic evidence for such fantasies. There is no fossil sequence of Aftrican people evolving into Eurasians, not even one step in the chain. Human geneticists learned about Out of Africa

As Homo became more and more dominant great apes became more and more limited on what environments they usually lived in. Aquatic environments are often desirable and great apes were pushed out of

As modern stone tools came into use incisors became less wide. As there was less need for them with the teeth no longer being as much a “third hand”. Dental morphology also changes under natural

Functional and phylogenetic variation in anthropoid incisor size Jeremiah E Scott 2021 AJPA doi org/10.1002/ajpa.24375 Objectives Previous studies have shown: - frugivorous anthropoids have wider

we present evidence that tail-loss evolution was mediated by the insertion of an individual Alu-element Not quite convinced by this. In the tailless mice they are talking about, the tail just stops

"... Since the gorilla and chimp are so morphologically similar and well suited to their diets and habitats, it is reasonable to think that the chimp-gorilla LCA was similar to them, ..." No: P & G