I think I now understand why the Bioko hypothesis is rejected by paleoanthropologists and by Marc and Mario. They are specialists in pre-human fossils, and the Bioko hypothesis makes this expertise irrelevant. (It is like specialists in basketball, who would naturally reject the suggestion of kicking the ball, which is something you do in football.)
Therefore I have changed my webpage  It now begins as follows:
There is now a simple scientific explanation for all the differences between humans and chimpanzees. 

It fits all the scientific evidence, but is not proven by available evidence. 
(And it would spoil the fun for specialists in pre-human fossils.)

Join to automatically receive all group messages.